Re: [ClusterLabs] stonith-ng - performing action 'monitor' timed out with signal 15

Hi, some updates about this? Thank you Il Mer 4 Set 2019, 10:46 Marco Marino ha scritto: > First of all, thank you for your support. > Andrey: sure, I can reach machines through IPMI. > Here is a short "log": > > #From ld1 trying to contact ld1 > [root@ld

Re: [ClusterLabs] stonith-ng - performing action 'monitor' timed out with signal 15

e1-monitor-interval-60s) Any idea? How can I reset the state of the cluster without downtime? "pcs resource cleanup" is enough? Thank you, Marco Il giorno mer 4 set 2019 alle ore 10:29 Jan Pokorný ha scritto: > On 03/09/19 20:15 +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote: > > 03.09.2019 11:09

[ClusterLabs] stonith-ng - performing action 'monitor' timed out with signal 15

Hi, I have a problem with fencing on a two node cluster. It seems that randomly the cluster cannot complete monitor operation for fence devices. In log I see: crmd[8206]: error: Result of monitor operation for fence-node2 on ld2.mydomain.it: Timed Out As attachment there is - /var/log/messages

Re: [ClusterLabs] HALVM monitor action fail on slave node. Possible bug?

t; monitor fail, use ocf-tester > > 2018-04-13 15:29 GMT+02:00 Marco Marino <marino@gmail.com>: > >> Hello, I'm trying to configure a simple 2 node cluster with drbd and >> HALVM (ocf:heartbeat:LVM) but I have a problem that I'm not able to solve, >> to I de

[ClusterLabs] HALVM monitor action fail on slave node. Possible bug?

Hello, I'm trying to configure a simple 2 node cluster with drbd and HALVM (ocf:heartbeat:LVM) but I have a problem that I'm not able to solve, to I decided to write this long post. I need to really understand what I'm doing and where I'm doing wrong. More precisely, I'm configuring a pacemaker

Re: [ClusterLabs] HALVM problem with 2 nodes cluster

s bad." in the function LVM_validate_all() Anyway, it's only a warning but there is a good reason. I'm not an expert, I'm studying for a certification and I have a lot of doubts. Thank you for your help Marco 2017-01-18 11:03 GMT+01:00 Ferenc Wágner <wf...@niif.hu>: > Marco Marino &l

Re: [ClusterLabs] HALVM problem with 2 nodes cluster

b...@suse.com>: > Hi, Marco > > On 01/18/2017 04:45 PM, Marco Marino wrote: > > Hi, I'm trying to realize a cluster with 2 nodes that manages a volume > group. > Basically I have a san connected to both nodes that exposes 1 lun. So both > nodes have a disk /dev/sd

[ClusterLabs] HALVM problem with 2 nodes cluster

Hi, I'm trying to realize a cluster with 2 nodes that manages a volume group. Basically I have a san connected to both nodes that exposes 1 lun. So both nodes have a disk /dev/sdb. From one node I did: fdisk /dev/sdb <- Create a partition with type = 8e (LVM) pvcreate /dev/sdb1 vgcreate myvg

Re: [ClusterLabs] SAN with drbd and pacemaker

reducing rebuild array time is my goal, so I think that create a virtual drive for each drive group is the right way. Please give me some advises Thanks 2015-09-18 13:02 GMT+02:00 Kai Dupke <kdu...@suse.com>: > On 09/18/2015 09:28 AM, Marco Marino wrote: > > Can you explain me

Re: [ClusterLabs] SAN with drbd and pacemaker

k has to be recovered, affecting all 16 volumes." Can you explain me this? 16 volumes? Thank you 2015-09-17 15:54 GMT+02:00 Kai Dupke <kdu...@suse.com>: > On 09/17/2015 09:44 AM, Marco Marino wrote: > > Hi, I have 2 servers supermicro lsi 2108 with many disks (80TB) and I'm > >