On 15/11/16 04:25 PM, Eric Robinson wrote:
> If a Linux server with bonded interfaces attached to different switches is
> rebooted, is it possible that a bridge loop could result for a brief period?
> We noticed that one of our 100 Linux servers became unresponsive and appears
> to have
his may
explain what you see.
> From: Jeremy Voorhis
> <jvoor...@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2016 2:13:59 PM To:
> Cluster Labs - All topics related to open-source clustering welcomed
> Subject: Re: [ClusterLabs] Can Bonding Cause
bridge loop.
--
*From:* Jeremy Voorhis <jvoor...@gmail.com>
*Sent:* Tuesday, November 15, 2016 2:13:59 PM
*To:* Cluster Labs - All topics related to open-source clustering welcomed
*Subject:* Re: [ClusterLabs] Can Bonding Cause a Broadcast Storm?
What bonding mode a
tering welcomed
Subject: Re: [ClusterLabs] Can Bonding Cause a Broadcast Storm?
What bonding mode are you using? Some modes require additional configuration
from the switch to avoid flooding. Also, is spanning tree enabled on the
switches?
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 1:26 PM Eric Robinson
<e
If a Linux server with bonded interfaces attached to different switches is
rebooted, is it possible that a bridge loop could result for a brief period? We
noticed that one of our 100 Linux servers became unresponsive and appears to
have rebooted. (The cause has not been determined.) A couple of
