Re: [ClusterLabs] DLM standalone without crm ?

2016-06-27 Thread Christine Caulfield
On 27/06/16 15:27, Lentes, Bernd wrote: > > - Am 27. Jun 2016 um 9:04 schrieb Christine Caulfield ccaul...@redhat.com: > >> On 26/06/16 14:47, Lentes, Bernd wrote: >>> >>> >>> - Am 26. Jun 2016 um 7:59 schrieb Ferenc Wágner wf...@niif.hu: >>> "Lentes, Bernd"

Re: [ClusterLabs] DLM standalone without crm ?

2016-06-27 Thread Lentes, Bernd
- Am 27. Jun 2016 um 9:04 schrieb Christine Caulfield ccaul...@redhat.com: > On 26/06/16 14:47, Lentes, Bernd wrote: >> >> >> - Am 26. Jun 2016 um 7:59 schrieb Ferenc Wágner wf...@niif.hu: >> >>> "Lentes, Bernd" writes: >>> wf...@niif.hu

Re: [ClusterLabs] DLM standalone without crm ?

2016-06-27 Thread Christine Caulfield
On 26/06/16 14:47, Lentes, Bernd wrote: > > > - Am 26. Jun 2016 um 7:59 schrieb Ferenc Wágner wf...@niif.hu: > >> "Lentes, Bernd" writes: >> >>> wf...@niif.hu writes: >>> "Lentes, Bernd" writes: > is it

Re: [ClusterLabs] DLM standalone without crm ?

2016-06-26 Thread Ferenc Wágner
"Lentes, Bernd" writes: > i don't have neither an init-script nor a systemd service file. > The only packages i find in the repositories concerning dlm are: > libdlm3-3.00.01-0.31.87 > libdlm-3.00.01-0.31.87 > And i have a kernel module for dlm. > Nothing

Re: [ClusterLabs] DLM standalone without crm ?

2016-06-25 Thread Ferenc Wágner
"Lentes, Bernd" writes: > is it possible to have a DLM running without CRM? Yes. You'll need to configure fencing, though, since by default DLM will try to use stonithd (from Pacemaker). But DLM fencing didn't handle fencing failures correctly for me,

Re: [ClusterLabs] DLM standalone without crm ?

2016-06-24 Thread Digimer
Yes, technically. I've not played with it stand-alone, and I believe it will still need corosync for internode communication and membership. Also, if a node fails and can't be fenced, I believe it will block. Others here might be able to speak more authoritatively than I. madi On 24/06/16 11:34