On 27/06/16 15:27, Lentes, Bernd wrote:
>
> - Am 27. Jun 2016 um 9:04 schrieb Christine Caulfield ccaul...@redhat.com:
>
>> On 26/06/16 14:47, Lentes, Bernd wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> - Am 26. Jun 2016 um 7:59 schrieb Ferenc Wágner wf...@niif.hu:
>>>
"Lentes, Bernd"
- Am 27. Jun 2016 um 9:04 schrieb Christine Caulfield ccaul...@redhat.com:
> On 26/06/16 14:47, Lentes, Bernd wrote:
>>
>>
>> - Am 26. Jun 2016 um 7:59 schrieb Ferenc Wágner wf...@niif.hu:
>>
>>> "Lentes, Bernd" writes:
>>>
wf...@niif.hu
On 26/06/16 14:47, Lentes, Bernd wrote:
>
>
> - Am 26. Jun 2016 um 7:59 schrieb Ferenc Wágner wf...@niif.hu:
>
>> "Lentes, Bernd" writes:
>>
>>> wf...@niif.hu writes:
>>>
"Lentes, Bernd" writes:
> is it
"Lentes, Bernd" writes:
> i don't have neither an init-script nor a systemd service file.
> The only packages i find in the repositories concerning dlm are:
> libdlm3-3.00.01-0.31.87
> libdlm-3.00.01-0.31.87
> And i have a kernel module for dlm.
> Nothing
"Lentes, Bernd" writes:
> is it possible to have a DLM running without CRM?
Yes. You'll need to configure fencing, though, since by default DLM
will try to use stonithd (from Pacemaker). But DLM fencing didn't
handle fencing failures correctly for me,
Yes, technically. I've not played with it stand-alone, and I believe it
will still need corosync for internode communication and membership.
Also, if a node fails and can't be fenced, I believe it will block.
Others here might be able to speak more authoritatively than I.
madi
On 24/06/16 11:34