On 15/03/16 02:12 PM, Ferenc Wágner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm referring here to an ancient LKML thread introducing DLM. In
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/299788 David Teigland
> states:
>
> GFS requires that a failed node be fenced prior to gfs being told to
> begin recovery
Hi,
I'm referring here to an ancient LKML thread introducing DLM. In
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/299788 David Teigland
states:
GFS requires that a failed node be fenced prior to gfs being told to
begin recovery for that node
which sounds very plausible as according to
