On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 8:04 AM, Digimer wrote:
>
> The only geo-located/stretch cluster approach that I've seen that makes
> any sense and seems genuinely safe is SUSE's 'pacemaker booth' project.
Also arriving in RHEL 7.3
Might be tech preview though.
On 10/10/2016 04:25 PM, Ken Gaillot wrote:
> On 10/09/2016 11:02 PM, Digimer wrote:
>> On 09/10/16 11:58 PM, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
>>> 10.10.2016 00:42, Eric Robinson пишет:
Digimer, thanks for your thoughts. Booth is one of the solutions I
looked at, but I don't like it because it is
On 09/10/16 11:58 PM, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
> 10.10.2016 00:42, Eric Robinson пишет:
>> Digimer, thanks for your thoughts. Booth is one of the solutions I
>> looked at, but I don't like it because it is complex and difficult to
>> implement
>
> HA is complex. There is no way around it.
>
>>
10.10.2016 00:42, Eric Robinson пишет:
> Digimer, thanks for your thoughts. Booth is one of the solutions I
> looked at, but I don't like it because it is complex and difficult to
> implement
HA is complex. There is no way around it.
> (and perhaps costly in terms of AWS services or something
>
g?
--
Eric Robinson
-Original Message-
From: Digimer [mailto:li...@alteeve.ca]
Sent: Sunday, October 09, 2016 2:05 PM
To: Cluster Labs - All topics related to open-source clustering welcomed
<users@clusterlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [ClusterLabs] I've been working on a split-brain
I faced with the same problem a few years ago - we needed to make a
two-node cluster working in a "split-brain" situation. We were looking at a
resource agent called SFEX which is disk based -
http://www.linux-ha.org/wiki/Sfex_(resource_agent) . At the end we rejected
SFEX because, if I am not
I've been working on a script for preventing split-brain in 2-node clusters and
I would appreciate comments from everyone. If someone already has a solution
like this, let me know!
Most of my database clusters are 2-nodes, with each node in a geographically
separate data center. Our layout