i say that my transformer
can index XML data (with a XSL transformation) and not realy the existing
indexer)
- Original Message -
From: Conal Tuohy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2004 21:24
Subject: RE: Extend Lucene sample to RDBMS?
Nicolas
with the existing transformer, the index has this structure:
fieldvalue
content coco coco2
(In fact, in the real situation, the index is empty because the transformer
index the content if this content is into the body tags, normal for a
HTML indexer, but not for a XML indexer, that why
information)
Nicolas Maisonneuve
- Original Message -
From: Conal Tuohy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2004 05:47
Subject: RE: Extend Lucene sample to RDBMS?
Nicolas Maisonneuve wrote:
ok to add a uri attribute to document tag (in fact my new
version
Nicolas Maisonneuve wrote:
my version doesn't allow nested lucene field because lucene
index is a flat
structure of fields.
The official versionof LuceneIndexTransformer is a fulltext
indexation.. It
indexes the content (and not the structure) in a general field named
content, there are
: RE: Extend Lucene sample to RDBMS?
Phil - make sure you use LuceneIndexTransformer[1] (LIT) rather than the
crawler to build the index. The LIT is far more convenient and much faster
for indexing database records and in general where you need to generate
multiple Lucene records from a single data
Nicolas Maisonneuve wrote:
see also a different version of LuceneIndexTransformer
index XML data and delete available
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-devm=107821889332237w=2
Indexing XML data is not new. The current LuceneIndexTransformer does this already.
The current version
=date
dateformat=MM/dd/11/03/1979/lucene:field /lucene:document
Nicolas Maisonneuve
- Original Message -
From: Conal Tuohy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2004 02:55
Subject: RE: Extend Lucene sample to RDBMS?
Nicolas Maisonneuve wrote:
see also
pguillard dijo:
Hi all,
I'd like to extend the Lucene sample to build index from my relational
DB. According to what i've found on the Lucene archive, there should be
no trouble, but i look for hints / suggestions to do this.
See this:
http://kasparov.skife.org/blog/2004/09/13#lucene-graphs
Phil - make sure you use LuceneIndexTransformer[1] (LIT) rather than the crawler to
build the index. The LIT is far more convenient and much faster for indexing database
records and in general where you need to generate multiple Lucene records from a
single data source. Basically, you would use
