Alexandre Victoor wrote:
Moreover, looking at the code, I wonder if it really useful for this
component to be poolable. It does not look like expensive in term of
memory/cpu to create an instance of XMLSerializer. Articles as
http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/library/j-jtp01274.html claims
Thanks for your answer. Interesting thread. Too bad that Avalon bring that
much overhead to object creation...
Alex
At 14:06 30/04/2004 +0200, you wrote:
Alexandre Victoor wrote:
Moreover, looking at the code, I wonder if it really useful for this
component to be poolable. It does not look
AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: XMLSerializer poolable?
Alexandre Victoor wrote:
Moreover, looking at the code, I wonder if it really useful for this
component to be poolable. It does not look like expensive in term of
memory/cpu to create an instance of XMLSerializer. Articles
