RE: sitemap-v06.rng

2004-04-30 Thread Carmona Perez, David
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Asunto: Re: sitemap-v06.rng Martin Holz wrote: I use sitemap-v06.rng for editing the sitemap with oxygen and I like it to be very restrictive. So I do not always have to look into the docu to see how a configuration looks exactly. I do change the sitemap quite often

Re: sitemap-v06.rng

2004-04-29 Thread Martin Holz
Hi, Carmona Perez, David [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I propose to change the RelaxNG validation file sitemap-v06.rng in this way: Component declaration like map:generator, map:transformer, map:serializer, and similars would need to be: [Snipped concrete implementation] That is, to allow any

RE: sitemap-v06.rng

2004-04-29 Thread Carmona Perez, David
PROTECTED] Asunto: Re: sitemap-v06.rng Hi, Carmona Perez, David [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I propose to change the RelaxNG validation file sitemap-v06.rng in this way: Component declaration like map:generator, map:transformer, map:serializer, and similars would need to be: [Snipped concrete

Re: sitemap-v06.rng

2004-04-29 Thread Joerg Heinicke
On 29.04.2004 17:00, Carmona Perez, David wrote: Hi, I also use it for editing and validating with XMLBuddy and Eclipse. At least there should be some extension mechanism for custom components. Not only custom components, but all Configurable components need this non-restrictive validation. I

Re: sitemap-v06.rng

2004-04-29 Thread David Crossley
Martin Holz wrote: I use sitemap-v06.rng for editing the sitemap with oxygen and I like it to be very restrictive. So I do not always have to look into the docu to see how a configuration looks exactly. I do change the sitemap quite often but do not write new components very often, especially