Re: [users@httpd] Application Developer, ICO watchdog

The last word. I am an application developer with a diverse set of skills. You are admin juniors. Learn some manners when you address people like me. > Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2021 at 4:17 AM > From: "back button" > To: users@httpd.apache.org > Cc: woh...@apache.org > Subject: Re:

Re: [users@httpd] Application Developer, ICO watchdog

You ass's don't even know the meaning of "man pages". How could you help me. You cant help yourself. Pardon the pun. I could see the frustration and the skill level when I read in the docs. Just because you setup a virtual host doesn't mean it will be seen by "magic". Just about every place I

Re: [users@httpd] Re: Consolidate multiple s

On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 4:59 PM Christophe JAILLET < christophe.jail...@wanadoo.fr> wrote: > Le 18/05/2021 à 22:26, vad...@gmail.com a écrit : > > That format got even worse feedback and I would too :-). Lets try this > one. > > > > Have you looked at mod_macro? > > CJ > Hey CJ, I will give

[users@httpd] Re: Consolidate multiple s

Le 18/05/2021 à 22:26, vad...@gmail.com a écrit : That format got even worse feedback and I would too :-). Lets try this one. Have you looked at mod_macro? CJ ProxyPass /confluencenode1 http://nodecnf001:8092/confluencenode1 ProxyPassReverse

[users@httpd] Re: Consolidate multiple s

That format got even worse feedback and I would too :-). Lets try this one. ProxyPass /confluencenode1 http://nodecnf001:8092/confluencenode1 ProxyPassReverse /confluencenode1 http://nodecnf001:8092/confluencenode1 ProxyPass /confluencenode2 http://nodecnf002:8092/confluencenode2 ProxyPassReverse

[users@httpd] Re: Application Developer, ICO watchdog

On 18/05/2021 20:11, Andrea Croci wrote: BTW, watch your language, or her father will sue you! Or even be called pedo!   Best thing is to ignore all his posts even if they are genuine real questions of interest here. I gave him/her the benefit of doubt in the past but now I have changed

[users@httpd] Re: Application Developer, ICO watchdog

On 18/05/2021 19:42, Nick Folino wrote: Nick, Can we just ignore the guy.  He seems to have personality disorder problems and he is after recognition of some kind here. I suggest we should all ignore his posts and the problem will go away. I gave him a newsgroup link where he can spend

[users@httpd] Re: Consolidate multiple s

Sorry the output was not clean. Trying a different format 1. ProxyPass /confluencenode1 http://nodecnf001:8092/confluencenode1 2. ProxyPassReverse /confluencenode1 http://nodecnf001:8092/confluencenode1 3. ProxyPass /confluencenode2 http://nodecnf002:8092/confluencenode2 4.

Re: [users@httpd] Application Developer, ICO watchdog

That's very true, but I still had a good laugh reading that idiocy. I'll give her an A grade for that. BTW, watch your language, or her father will sue you! On 18.05.21 20:42, Nick Folino wrote: You're an idiot. Nick age 50 On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 2:28 PM wrote: I have completed my

Re: [users@httpd] Application Developer, ICO watchdog

You're an idiot. Nick age 50 On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 2:28 PM wrote: > > I have completed my school project. > I showed it to my Daddy. > > I showed him how easy it is to setup a website if you have Ubuntu and even > better with Ubuntu-mate. > ALT + CTL + T > type couple of commands and

[users@httpd] Consolidate multiple s

Hi All, I have this config and it works fine. Looking for a way to consolidate it. I tried few things and no success yet. ProxyPass /confluencenode1 http://nodecnf001:8092/confluencenode1 ProxyPassReverse /confluencenode1 http://nodecnf001:8092/confluencenode1 ProxyPass /confluencenode2

[users@httpd] Application Developer, ICO watchdog

I have completed my school project.I showed it to my Daddy. I showed him how easy it is to setup a website if you have Ubuntu and even better with Ubuntu-mate.ALT + CTL + T type  couple of commands and everything is done for you including security. He said if I show the effort I put in to the

[users@httpd] DKIM misconfiguration of this mailing list

Hello, I'm having trouble receiving messages from this mailing list because many of them have a broken DKIM signature. I guess that's because the mailing list is not configured properly to survive in today's e-mail world. If a message with a DKIM signature is sent to this list (like mine),

Re: [users@httpd] which bit ?

On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 8:27 AM Antony Stone wrote: > > On Tuesday 18 May 2021 at 14:07:03, back button wrote: > > > That it is a long standing problem that apache httpd and ubuntu httpd are > > two different products therefore case for widespread confusion ? > > I've only been on this mailing

Re: [users@httpd] which bit ?

On Tuesday 18 May 2021 at 14:35:56, back button wrote: > I do not need any help setting up and installing any software. So, what is your purpose on this mailing list? > The internet was not invented by Americans I suggest you try reading the second paragraph of

Re: [users@httpd] which bit ?

I do not need any help setting up and installing any software. I was simply gauging your response to the points highlighted. You wanted me to look bad for your short comings. Aaahhh isn't it predictable to shoot the messenger. Check out https://www.backbutton.org to see that point in action.

Re: [users@httpd] which bit ?

On Tuesday 18 May 2021 at 14:07:03, back button wrote: > That it is a long standing problem that apache httpd and ubuntu httpd are > two different products therefore case for widespread confusion ? I've only been on this mailing list for 2 years, but I'm pretty sure this is the first time

Re: [users@httpd] which bit ?

On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 8:07 AM back button wrote: > > My second point which I made and later confirmed by Eric Convener and also by > an email > who has an apache email address and not reflected in your response.Read the > the archives for that. You failed to recognise that. Please

Re: [users@httpd] which bit ?

My second point which I made and later confirmed by Eric Convener and also by an email who has an apache email address and not reflected in your response.Read the the archives for that. You failed to recognise that. Please acknowledge your failure . That it is a long standing problem

Re: [users@httpd] which bit ?

All: I have read back a few weeks in the archives for posts from this individual, "Back button." I do not see any contravention of the code of conduct on the lists by Nick Folino, or other project members. In fact, what I see is Nick asking "Back button" to tone it down, and then because of