Kannel timeouts / connectivity issues

Anybody know what Kannel's expected behavior when HTTP connections timeout or fail? We have a situation with 120+ sms-service services defined, but have noticed a few of them behave in a peculiar manner where, very occasionally, HTTP requests don't occur until 16 minutes after being received

RE: Forcing SMSC doesn't work

-prefix = 027;6427;+6427 denied-smsc-id = SMSC-T1.B;SMSC-T1.C;SMSC-T2.A -- had to include the SMSC(s) for the other telco here preferred-smsc-id = SMSC-T1.A Messages have been pushed out on the requested SMSC 100% of the time now. David -Original Message- From: David Ritchie [mailto

Forcing SMSC doesn't work

Hi -- when doing an MT push, I want to force the SMSC I want messages to go out on, regardless of what the handset's prefix happens to be. However, it doesn't seem to work -- messages just go out on a random SMSC, even when I include a smsc= value in the MT push URL. We're recently suffering the

Masking originating addresses

Hello all -- has anybody had any success with using TPOA (or similar) to mask the originating address for MT SMS messages? Regards David

RE: Masking originating addresses

Yes, that's right -- setting the sender number. -Original Message- From: Iain Dooley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, 30 January 2007 10:32 a.m. To: David Ritchie Cc: users@kannel.org Subject: Re: Masking originating addresses hi david, On Tue, 30 Jan 2007, David Ritchie wrote

DLR storage in MySQL

We're storing DLRs in MySQL successfully but the DLRs aren't being deleted which seems at odds with other people's experience (i.e. http://www.kannel.org/pipermail/users/2006-August/000294.html) but makes sense, since often we include a dlr-mask value (e.g. 12) which result in multiple DLRs

Multiple smsboxes (was RE: Prioritising MO/MT messages)

is actually listened to. If I leave off the second group configuration, then it doesn't start up at all. Thanks David R -Original Message- From: Stipe Tolj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, 16 July 2006 11:52 p.m. To: David Ritchie Cc: users@kannel.org Subject: Re: Prioritising MO/MT

Prioritising MO/MT messages

MT messages to be a lower priority to MO messages? Or even prioritising services one over another? Or perhaps this is a file descriptor problem -- would increasing the number of FDs allow more messages to be sent during a given time? Have you any other ideas / experience? Regards David Ritchie

Abnormal termination every 5 minutes

thanks David Ritchie Run The Red nopassword-kannel.conf Description: nopassword-kannel.conf