Re: SMS command_status for long MT messages

2018-06-04 Thread amalysh
Hi Jeff, it makes maybe sense for your case but not for all cases, therefore I don’t see a sense to invest time into it. Thanks, Alex > Am 02.06.2018 um 15:26 schrieb Jeff Thorn : > > Hi Alex, > Thanks for explaining, makes sense. > > The most common status we get is invalid destination

Re: SMS command_status for long MT messages

2018-06-02 Thread Jeff Thorn
Hi Alex, Thanks for explaining, makes sense. The most common status we get is invalid destination address (0x000b). In this case all 3 parts in your example would have the same status. Would it make sense to include the status of it was the same for all parts? Jeff Thorn CEO Thorn

Re: SMS command_status for long MT messages

2018-06-02 Thread amalysh
Hi, this is expected behaviour because we have to put all statuses into one DLR message. Just imagine if you have 3 parts and each of this part will be rejected with different error code, would you expect all 3 error codes in the status? Thanks, Alex > Am 30.05.2018 um 20:50 schrieb Jeff