Re: unsubscribe
2014-08-19 8:50 GMT+01:00 Jorge Fernando Garcia Diaz jorge.fernando.garcia.d...@ericsson.com:
Kannel Information Request
Hello, I explain my need : I have 2 sites interconnected by a private network, and encryption is not possible on this network (for many reasons). Between the 2 sites I have smpp flow and I want to securise it. The idea is to install 2 Kannel instances (site A and site B) and convert smpp to http from site A and send it to site b, when arrival I reconvert it to smpp to send it to the ESME. I succed to send an MO from an SMPPSim to instance kannel 1 (with smpp) and send the deliver_sm from kannel 1 to kannel 2 (with http). But the problem is, between kannel 2 and the ESME, the deliver_sm that I sent is converted to submit_sm. I don't know why ? I want to keep it a deliver_sm along this way : SMSC (smpp) -- kannel 1(http) --- (http) kannel 2 (smpp) -- ESME Thanks for help Best Regards, Ahmed BEN ALI
Re: Kannel Information Request
Hi All, Someone has an idea, please ? Best Regards, 2013/8/27 Ahmed ben ali ahmed.ben...@gmail.com Hello, I explain my need : I have 2 sites interconnected by a private network, and encryption is not possible on this network (for many reasons). Between the 2 sites I have smpp flow and I want to securise it. The idea is to install 2 Kannel instances (site A and site B) and convert smpp to http from site A and send it to site b, when arrival I reconvert it to smpp to send it to the ESME. I succed to send an MO from an SMPPSim to instance kannel 1 (with smpp) and send the deliver_sm from kannel 1 to kannel 2 (with http). But the problem is, between kannel 2 and the ESME, the deliver_sm that I sent is converted to submit_sm. I don't know why ? I want to keep it a deliver_sm along this way : SMSC (smpp) -- kannel 1(http) --- (http) kannel 2 (smpp) -- ESME Thanks for help Best Regards,
Re: Kannel Information Request
Hello Spameden, Thanks you for your response, I m totally agree with you but unfortunately I have no possibility to use OpenVPN tunnel, it s a decision of security team (many complicated reasons unfortunately). My idea is to convert smpp to http (via kannel) and redirect the http to https (via nginx). That's why I need to connect 2 kannel instancies. I didn't describe the https redirection to simplify the euse case. finally : smpp -- http -- https https -- http -- smpp : I want to recover the same initial message without any change (deliver-sm must be keeped deliver_sm and the same think for de submit_sm) I hope it is more clear Thanks a lot. 2013/8/27 spameden spame...@gmail.com 2013/8/27 Ahmed ben ali ahmed.ben...@gmail.com Hello, I explain my need : I have 2 sites interconnected by a private network, and encryption is not possible on this network (for many reasons). Between the 2 sites I have smpp flow and I want to securise it. How do you want to secure it? The best practice is to set OpenVPN tunnel or any other VPN between two nodes and let traffic flow through it. The idea is to install 2 Kannel instances (site A and site B) and convert smpp to http from site A and send it to site b, when arrival I reconvert it to smpp to send it to the ESME. HTTP is not secure, and can be sniffed easily as well as SMPP. I succed to send an MO from an SMPPSim to instance kannel 1 (with smpp) and send the deliver_sm from kannel 1 to kannel 2 (with http). But the problem is, between kannel 2 and the ESME, the deliver_sm that I sent is converted to submit_sm. I don't know why ? I want to keep it a deliver_sm along this way : SMSC (smpp) -- kannel 1(http) --- (http) kannel 2 (smpp) -- ESME Thanks for help Best Regards, Ahmed BEN ALI
Re: Kannel Information Request
Yes but it is a solution to encrypt the http using ssl (instead of nginx) but dosn't resolve the issue. The deliver_sm sent by the instance 1 will be converted to a submit_sm in the instance 2. 2013/8/28 spameden spame...@gmail.com You can use built-in SSL support instead: http://www.kannel.org/download/1.4.3/userguide-1.4.3/userguide.html#SSL-ENABLING 2013/8/28 Ahmed ben ali ahmed.ben...@gmail.com Hello Spameden, Thanks you for your response, I m totally agree with you but unfortunately I have no possibility to use OpenVPN tunnel, it s a decision of security team (many complicated reasons unfortunately). My idea is to convert smpp to http (via kannel) and redirect the http to https (via nginx). That's why I need to connect 2 kannel instancies. I didn't describe the https redirection to simplify the euse case. finally : smpp -- http -- https https -- http -- smpp : I want to recover the same initial message without any change (deliver-sm must be keeped deliver_sm and the same think for de submit_sm) I hope it is more clear Thanks a lot. 2013/8/27 spameden spame...@gmail.com 2013/8/27 Ahmed ben ali ahmed.ben...@gmail.com Hello, I explain my need : I have 2 sites interconnected by a private network, and encryption is not possible on this network (for many reasons). Between the 2 sites I have smpp flow and I want to securise it. How do you want to secure it? The best practice is to set OpenVPN tunnel or any other VPN between two nodes and let traffic flow through it. The idea is to install 2 Kannel instances (site A and site B) and convert smpp to http from site A and send it to site b, when arrival I reconvert it to smpp to send it to the ESME. HTTP is not secure, and can be sniffed easily as well as SMPP. I succed to send an MO from an SMPPSim to instance kannel 1 (with smpp) and send the deliver_sm from kannel 1 to kannel 2 (with http). But the problem is, between kannel 2 and the ESME, the deliver_sm that I sent is converted to submit_sm. I don't know why ? I want to keep it a deliver_sm along this way : SMSC (smpp) -- kannel 1(http) --- (http) kannel 2 (smpp) -- ESME Thanks for help Best Regards, Ahmed BEN ALI
