Hi All,
Is there any reason, workaround for the 389DS about high-rate queries?
Acting as LDAP server for one exim and 5 postfix servers, and for 6
courier-imap servers, libnss-pam
After a time, my clients cannot connect to the 389DS, ldap queries coming back
with temporary lookup faulure.
Hi Karoly,
You give very little information to go by... it might help to provide log files
error and maybe access. Try different loglevels for the error log and explain
in a bit more detail what is going wrong with your installation.
Regards
From: 389-users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hi Karoly,
When you run the 389-console and double click on the Directory Server component
of you installation you will have the ability to change the loglevel. Select
the configuration tab and then select access log. That will show you were the
access log is stored. You can also select error
On 03/28/2011 03:45 AM, Karoly Czovek wrote:
Hi All,
Is there any reason, workaround for the 389DS about high-rate queries?
Acting as LDAP server for one exim and 5 postfix servers, and for 6
courier-imap servers, libnss-pam
What version of 389-ds-base? 32-bit or 64-bit?
After a time, my
the server is 32bit, the exact client error message is cannot connect to the
server.
(even ldapsearch cant). let me check the logs once appearing the errors again,
now disabled the restart cronjob.
On Mar 28, 2011, at 4:16 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 03/28/2011 03:45 AM, Karoly Czovek
On 03/28/2011 08:29 AM, Karoly Czovek wrote:
the server is 32bit, the exact client error message is cannot connect
to the server.
But what is the error code? 80? 81? 91? If you can reproduce with
ldapsearch, in the shell, $? should hold the error code
(even ldapsearch cant). let me check
lance:~# /usr/bin/ldapsearch -x -LLL uid=karoly.czovek
ldap_result: Can't contact LDAP server (-1)
lance:~# echo $?
254
[here i restarted 389ds on the ldap server]
lance:~# /usr/bin/ldapsearch -x -LLL uid=karoly.czovek
dn: uid=karoly.czovek,ou=People,dc=moveone,dc=info
gidNumber: 1010
On 03/28/2011 10:09 AM, Karoly Czovek wrote:
lance:~# /usr/bin/ldapsearch -x -LLL uid=karoly.czovek
ldap_result: Can't contact LDAP server (-1)
lance:~# echo $?
254
[here i restarted 389ds on the ldap server]
lance:~# /usr/bin/ldapsearch -x -LLL uid=karoly.czovek
dn:
On 03/28/2011 10:20 AM, Karoly Czovek wrote:
Let me wait for the next errors, switched back accesslog
pkg info:
Name : 389-ds-base
Arch : i386
Version: 1.2.7.5
Release: 1.el5
Size : 5.4 M
Repo : installed
Summary: 389 Directory Server (base)
Ok. I think
Seems.
[28/Mar/2011:19:08:31 +0200] conn=3416 op=-1 fd=72 closed - T2
[28/Mar/2011:19:08:31 +0200] conn=3417 op=-1 fd=72 closed - T2
[28/Mar/2011:19:08:32 +0200] conn=3418 op=-1 fd=72 closed - T2
[28/Mar/2011:19:08:32 +0200] conn=3419 op=-1 fd=72 closed - T2
[28/Mar/2011:19:08:32 +0200] conn=3420
On 03/28/2011 11:17 AM, Karoly Czovek wrote:
Seems.
[28/Mar/2011:19:08:31 +0200] conn=3416 op=-1 fd=72 closed - T2
[28/Mar/2011:19:08:31 +0200] conn=3417 op=-1 fd=72 closed - T2
[28/Mar/2011:19:08:32 +0200] conn=3418 op=-1 fd=72 closed - T2
[28/Mar/2011:19:08:32 +0200] conn=3419 op=-1 fd=72
On 03/28/2011 12:51 PM, Quint Van Deman wrote:
Hello--
I'm seeing some odd behaviour in a 389ds installation, and I'd like to
know if others have as well.
Here's what I know:
1. The server is configured never to drop connections due to idle
timeout (set to 0 in console)
2. The server is
On 03/28/2011 02:09 PM, Quint Van Deman wrote:
Thanks Rich--
Is the release candidate stable enough fro production use at this point?
So far it is more stable than 1.2.7.5
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 3:02 PM, Rich Megginsonrmegg...@redhat.com wrote:
On 03/28/2011 12:51 PM, Quint Van Deman
Thanks Rich, I'll give rc2 a try.
-Quint
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 4:42 PM, Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com wrote:
On 03/28/2011 02:09 PM, Quint Van Deman wrote:
Thanks Rich--
Is the release candidate stable enough fro production use at this point?
So far it is more stable than 1.2.7.5
Will the update affect my own objectclasses?
Can I copy somehow my own schemas to the new salve servers?
On Mar 28, 2011, at 10:54 PM, Quint Van Deman wrote:
Thanks Rich, I'll give rc2 a try.
--
Karoly CZOVEK
Global Systems Administrator
MoveOne IT Department
Eastern Europe - Balkans
On 03/28/2011 03:14 PM, Karoly Czovek wrote:
Will the update affect my own objectclasses?
If you yum update from 1.2.7.5 to 1.2.8.rc2 it should not affect any of
your data or configuration.
Can I copy somehow my own schemas to the new salve servers?
Yes. If you have user defined schema files
Sorry I missed this. I don't get on the list often enough, lately.
(But I have this deja vu feeling, too.)
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 3:30 AM, James McKenzie
jjmckenzi...@earthlink.net wrote:
All:
I am looking at installing Linux on a very old piece of hardware. I've
tried FC12/13/14 but the
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 4:37 AM, Fernando Cassia fcas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 4:20 PM, Genes MailLists li...@sapience.com wrote:
Unless there's a rational business plan it makes no sense to sponsor
this ... think like a businessperson ..
Is mindshare and brand promotion
On 27/03/11 18:32, Mikkel wrote:
On 03/22/2011 04:19 PM, compdoc wrote:
My problem is
that the only way I can get Windows to run is to plug it into
the first slot, then Windows boots but I never see grub.
By first slot I guess you sata port? It's been a while since I've noticed
Windows
Ok. Migrating from openldap with 4 slave replicas to 389DS,
so i am new in the world of 389DS but my boss is forcing it cos have nice UI ;)
Where i can check for verbose error logs or increase log level?
On Mar 28, 2011, at 12:26 PM, Gerrard Geldenhuis wrote:
Hi Karoly,
You give very little
On 3/28/11, Bob Goodwin bobgood...@wildblue.net wrote:
I managed to create a grub.conf that works [a minor miracle].
However I am interested in this.
I don't see the map option in man grub?
Info grub is hard to deal with, copied it to info.txt which
On 28/03/11 06:41, Andras Simon wrote:
On 3/28/11, Bob Goodwinbobgood...@wildblue.net wrote:
I managed to create a grub.conf that works [a minor miracle].
However I am interested in this.
I don't see the map option in man grub?
Info grub is hard to deal
Hello,
I need to use chkfontpath command but I cannot find it in Fedora 15 Alpha.
It seems philosophy for font and font server for X has been changed.
Is there any doc to understand how it works now?
Thanks in advance,
regards,
Frederic
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 28/03/2011 14:05, fsos...@gmail.com a écrit :
Hello,
I need to use chkfontpath command but I cannot find it in Fedora 15 Alpha.
It seems philosophy for font and font server for X has been changed.
Is there any doc to understand how it works
OK, found it.
Disabled the restart cronjob, let me see what happens... error log was set to
connections, i guess
i'll need loglevel.
Any idea, what settings i need basicly @server side, with so 'high' connection
rate?
On Mar 28, 2011, at 3:46 PM, Gerrard Geldenhuis wrote:
Hi Karoly,
When
thanks for that info
2011/3/28 François Patte francois.pa...@mi.parisdescartes.fr:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 28/03/2011 14:05, fsos...@gmail.com a écrit :
Hello,
I need to use chkfontpath command but I cannot find it in Fedora 15 Alpha.
It seems philosophy for font
Joe,
Take a look at what I found: Fedora 14 includes a tech preview of
systemd, a next-generation replacement for Upstart and SystemV init.
Systemd allows for parallel and on-demand starting of services and
features, which will result in faster boot times..
It seems that yum didn't install
i can reproduce, but the server is in production.
if the clients got this error then i also unable to connect with ldapsearch.
just now appeared, i have full verbose trace logs, but nothin intrestring,
but a ton from theese
28/Mar/2011:10:33:00 -0400] - = slapi_reslimit_get_integer_limit()
I'm ok after reading the fontconfig man page.
I need to integrate javafont (from Java 6). Is someone knows if Java
is able to deal with linux Fontconfig library ?
regards,
On 28 March 2011 16:16, fsos...@gmail.com fsos...@gmail.com wrote:
thanks for that info
2011/3/28 François Patte
On 03/28/2011 07:28 AM, Krosh Ivanov wrote:
Joe,
Take a look at what I found: Fedora 14 includes a tech preview of
systemd, a next-generation replacement for Upstart and SystemV init.
Systemd allows for parallel and on-demand starting of services and
features, which will result in faster boot
On 03/22/2011 05:14 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 03/21/2011 09:14 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 03/21/2011 10:07 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
* Try to open 2 side-by-side terminals on Fedora 15's Gnome 3:
I haven't managed to do so, yet.
Right click - New window or control+shift+t if you are
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 3:09 AM, Joel Rees joel.r...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry I missed this. I don't get on the list often enough, lately.
(But I have this deja vu feeling, too.)
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 3:30 AM, James McKenzie
jjmckenzi...@earthlink.net wrote:
All:
I am looking at
On Fri, 2011-03-25 at 15:20 -0400, Genes MailLists wrote:
What is the commercial reason to do this then? I understand what -you-
want - but redhat needs to have a business reason to leverage this -
like RHEL derives from fedora ...
Unless there's a rational business plan it makes no sense
Hi,
is anybody using Fedora having issue with compiz crashing while
plugging in external monitor?
This issue has happen to me on Fedora 12, 13 and now on 14.
I would like to help and track down this bug. I have collected some
abrt logs but having more people with same issue always help to track
Well... given the demise of Meego, more or less, and the pending demise
Meego isn't dead.
of Symbian and the fact that Nokia just signed a deal with the software
devil to use Windows on their handsets, I think there is a huge
opportunity for Redhat to go after the mobile device market. Just
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Linuxguy123 linuxguy...@gmail.com wrote:
I think there is a huge
opportunity for Redhat to go after the mobile device market. Just look
at the success of Android. A lot of players in the mobile market would
love to partner with someone other than Google.
I
On 03/28/2011 07:58 PM, Krosh Ivanov wrote:
Joe,
Take a look at what I found: Fedora 14 includes a tech preview of
systemd, a next-generation replacement for Upstart and SystemV init.
Systemd allows for parallel and on-demand starting of services and
features, which will result in faster boot
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 7:16 AM, Joel Rees joel.r...@gmail.com wrote:
Okay, so you know that ARM is a secondary ARCH in Fedora. You're just
wanting someone with a bit of spare money (quite a bit, really) to
start making hardware with Fedora pre-installed.
Not exactly. Re-read what I said.
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 11:15:51 -0600,
Linuxguy123 linuxguy...@gmail.com wrote:
Well... given the demise of Meego, more or less, and the pending demise
of Symbian and the fact that Nokia just signed a deal with the software
devil to use Windows on their handsets, I think there is a huge
On Mon, 2011-03-28 at 14:35 -0300, Fernando Cassia wrote:
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 7:16 AM, Joel Rees joel.r...@gmail.com wrote:
Okay, so you know that ARM is a secondary ARCH in Fedora. You're just
wanting someone with a bit of spare money (quite a bit, really) to
start making hardware with
On 03/28/2011 11:05 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 7:16 AM, Joel Rees joel.r...@gmail.com wrote:
Okay, so you know that ARM is a secondary ARCH in Fedora. You're just
wanting someone with a bit of spare money (quite a bit, really) to
start making hardware with Fedora
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 3:08 PM, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote:
The only people who can realistically target tablets are the ones with
commercial backing and a business plan. It is not a market where a
volunteer community can easily thrive in. It requires custom built
kernels,
On 03/28/2011 11:28 PM, Linuxguy123 wrote:
On Mon, 2011-03-28 at 14:35 -0300, Fernando Cassia wrote:
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 7:16 AM, Joel Rees joel.r...@gmail.com wrote:
Okay, so you know that ARM is a secondary ARCH in Fedora. You're just
wanting someone with a bit of spare money (quite a
On 03/28/2011 11:35 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 3:08 PM, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote:
The only people who can realistically target tablets are the ones with
commercial backing and a business plan. It is not a market where a
volunteer community can easily
Hi,
This means you have not configured your network.
But how could you when the kernl has not detected
your wifi card?
As I had indicated before, kernel 2.6.35 is the first
kernel
that started supporting the Ralink rt28xxx chipset.
What kernel version are you running? Have you done
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Adam Tong helpc...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi,
This means you have not configured your network.
But how could you when the kernl has not detected
your wifi card?
As I had indicated before, kernel 2.6.35 is the first
kernel
that started supporting the
On 03/21/2011 09:14 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 03/21/2011 10:07 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
* Try to open 2 side-by-side terminals on Fedora 15's Gnome 3:
I haven't managed to do so, yet.
Right click - New window or control+shift+t if you are using GNOME Terminal
Doesn't work for me
On Monday 28 March 2011 18:19:53 valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote:
is anybody using Fedora having issue with compiz crashing while
plugging in external monitor?
This issue has happen to me on Fedora 12, 13 and now on 14.
I've been using compiz/emerald on top of KDE since F9, and it never ever
Thanks Rich--
Is the release candidate stable enough fro production use at this point?
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 3:02 PM, Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com wrote:
On 03/28/2011 12:51 PM, Quint Van Deman wrote:
Hello--
I'm seeing some odd behaviour in a 389ds installation, and I'd like to
Bill Davidsen wrote:
Bill Davidsen wrote:
compdoc wrote:
Keyboard works, mouse doesn't.
Does that give you any clues?
I'm using qemu-kvm 0.14.0, and I have to run the command like this or
neither the mouse or keyboard works:
qemu-kvm -m 512 -hda svr.img -soundhw
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 10:04 PM, Marko Vojinovic vvma...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday 28 March 2011 18:19:53 valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote:
is anybody using Fedora having issue with compiz crashing while
plugging in external monitor?
This issue has happen to me on Fedora 12, 13 and now on 14.
Ubuntu does ARM right now.
Ubuntu has a netbook version.
Ubuntu has Unity.
http://www.canonical.com/engineering-services/oem-services/why-ubuntu/products
If Redhat isn't going to cater to this market, I have a feeling someone
else will.
Its great that Redhat focuses on its markets, but I
On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 15:36:40 -0600
Linuxguy123 linuxguy...@gmail.com wrote:
Ubuntu does ARM right now.
Ubuntu has a netbook version.
Ubuntu has Unity.
http://www.canonical.com/engineering-services/oem-services/why-ubuntu/products
If Redhat isn't going to cater to this market, I have
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 6:45 PM, Alan Cox a...@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk wrote:
Red Hat is a SEC listed business whose
primary job is making shareholders and customers happy by generating a
regular profit.
Wow, I´m sure nobody here knew that. *sarcasm*
In which way can porting Fedora/RH to run on
On 28/03/11 10:47, Carroll Grigsby wrote:
Bob:
Pretty much all about Grub:
http://www.dedoimedo.com/computers/grub.html
A minor point: Fedora's configuration file for grub is grub.conf rather
that menu.lst, menu.lst is a link to grub.conf.
Also, this document does *not* apply to Grub2,
On 3/28/11, Fernando Cassia fcas...@gmail.com wrote:
In which way can porting Fedora/RH to run on tables contributes to
MAKING A LOSS or NOT generating a profit?.
By having to pay people, infrastructure, whatever.
In fact, having people talk about your brand/name creates mindshare,
and thus
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 8:01 PM, Andras Simon sza...@gmail.com wrote:
Or not. People who make decisions in IT departments on which OS to run
on their servers are hopefully not basing those decisions on who's
supplying the OS for their gadgets.
Exactly, that must be why Novell never lost any
Hi,
This version of Linux DOES indeed support rt2xxx chipsets, so I am at a loss
as to why it is not detecting your USB wifi device which has this chipset.
I appreciate your help. You know, this is an old laptop that came with windows.
This is the kind of deal windows make with some
Hi Adam.
Since you have a usb port, do you have a separate usb/wireless dongle that
you can insert in the usb port to see if it gets recognized by the OS.
you can get cheap dlink wireless dongles to test (and then take back to the
store!!).
I've always got a cheap dlink to use as a test for usb
On 03/28/2011 10:01 PM, Steven P. Ulrick wrote:
On 03/21/2011 09:14 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 03/21/2011 10:07 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
* Try to open 2 side-by-side terminals on Fedora 15's Gnome 3:
I haven't managed to do so, yet.
Right click - New window or control+shift+t if you are
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 7:38 PM, Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote:
Perhaps control+shift+n ?
Yeah, ... this finally did it.
But note how long it took to find this out - IMO, it proves Gnome3's
lack of usability.
I don't get it. What has this got to do with Gnome 3? This is a
On 03/29/2011 05:48 AM, suvayu ali wrote:
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 7:38 PM, Ralf Corsepiusrc040...@freenet.de wrote:
Perhaps control+shift+n ?
Yeah, ... this finally did it.
But note how long it took to find this out - IMO, it proves Gnome3's
lack of usability.
I don't get it. What has
On 03/29/2011 01:08 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
In Gnome3 such a UI doesn't exist, users are being forced to dig into
keyboard short cuts == Lack of usability.
Seeing as F15 is alpha maybe it would be helpful to bring up your
observations on the t...@lists.fedoraproject.org list? And, of
On 03/29/2011 07:17 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 03/29/2011 01:08 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
In Gnome3 such a UI doesn't exist, users are being forced to dig into
keyboard short cuts == Lack of usability.
Seeing as F15 is alpha maybe it would be helpful to bring up your
observations on the
64 matches
Mail list logo
