Re: [389-users] Proper handling of No original_tombstone for changenumber errors

2014-10-01 Thread Anthony Messina
On Tuesday, September 30, 2014 09:20:16 AM Ludwig Krispenz wrote: On 09/29/2014 11:15 PM, Anthony Messina wrote: Thanks, Ludwig. I will open a ticket. Can you elaborate on whether or not this is a logging issue, or actually an issue with my replication/changelog, etc. As I said, I'm

[389-users] 389DS memeberof plugin not working

2014-10-01 Thread Ghiurea, Isabella
Hello 389 users, I'm having problems getting the memberof plugin work on 389-Directory/1.2.11.15 B2014.219.179. We are using groupofuniquenames groups. Here's the configuration of the memberof plugin: objectClass: extensibleObject (auxiliary) objectClass: nsSlapdPlugin (structural) objectClass:

Re: [389-users] 389DS memeberof plugin not working

2014-10-01 Thread Mark Reynolds
On 10/01/2014 02:34 PM, Ghiurea, Isabella wrote: Hello 389 users, I'm having problems getting the memberof plugin work on 389-Directory/1.2.11.15 B2014.219.179. We are using groupofuniquenames groups. Here's the configuration of the memberof plugin: objectClass: extensibleObject

Re: [389-users] 389DS memeberof plugin not working

2014-10-01 Thread Ghiurea, Isabella
Mark, Thank you for feedback, we cheked we do have that atributememberOf and object class Any other suggestions? Isabella From: Mark Reynolds [marey...@redhat.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2014 2:59 PM To: General discussion list for the 389 Directory server

Re: [389-users] 389DS memeberof plugin not working

2014-10-01 Thread Mark Reynolds
On 10/01/2014 03:01 PM, Ghiurea, Isabella wrote: Mark, Thank you for feedback, we cheked we do have that atributememberOf and object class If you have the memberOf attribute in the entry then it's working :-) Is there anything in the errors log? You can also enable plugin logging if you

Fedora 20 x64 on Fujitsu Siemens Q5020 ( GM965/GM960 ) video problem

2014-10-01 Thread Cristian Sava
Hi all, I installed F20 x64 on Fujitsu Siemens Q5020 and I only can set 1024x768 or 800x600 video. How can I set it to 1366x768 or 1280x720 ? I tried i915.modeset=1 to kernel options with no luck. Any ideas? Thanks, C. Sava -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or

Re: what causes: kernel:[38405.042543] do_IRQ: 0.81 No irq handler for vector (irq -1)

2014-10-01 Thread Heinz Diehl
On 30.09.2014, Ranjan Maitra wrote: Thanks! I will do that right now. This only happens to me on a wakeup from hibernate and with one new laptop (Dell Precision M3800). If this gives you problems, you could try to disable irqbalance to work around. Otherwise, I would have ignored the message

Re: Fedora 20 x64 on Fujitsu Siemens Q5020 ( GM965/GM960 ) video problem

2014-10-01 Thread Cristian Sava
On Wed, 2014-10-01 at 09:51 +0300, Cristian Sava wrote: Hi all, I installed F20 x64 on Fujitsu Siemens Q5020 and I only can set 1024x768 or 800x600 video. How can I set it to 1366x768 or 1280x720 ? I tried i915.modeset=1 to kernel options with no luck. Any ideas? Thanks, C. Sava I

Please keep F20 up-to-date (if you can't hold release dates)

2014-10-01 Thread Gerhard Hueller
Hello, A few days ago, Mesa-10.3 has been released, while Mesa 10.2 now marks the stable version. The version which currently ships as part of Fedora-20 is 10.1, which receuived its last update in June. Guys, if you can't hold release dates, please keep at least the current distribution

Re: Please keep F20 up-to-date (if you can't hold release dates)

2014-10-01 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 10/01/2014 11:47 AM, Gerhard Hueller wrote: Hello, A few days ago, Mesa-10.3 has been released, while Mesa 10.2 now marks the stable version. The version which currently ships as part of Fedora-20 is 10.1, which receuived its last update in June. Guys, if you can't hold release dates,

Re: Please keep F20 up-to-date (if you can't hold release dates)

2014-10-01 Thread Matthew Miller
On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 11:47:15AM +0200, Gerhard Hueller wrote: Guys, if you can't hold release dates, please keep at least the current distribution up-to-date. It is done with the kernel, so why aren't other critical parts of the system handled in a rolling-release like way? The idea of not

Re: what causes: kernel:[38405.042543] do_IRQ: 0.81 No irq handler for vector (irq -1)

2014-10-01 Thread Ranjan Maitra
On Wed, 1 Oct 2014 08:52:19 +0200 Heinz Diehl htd...@fritha.org wrote: On 30.09.2014, Ranjan Maitra wrote: Thanks! I will do that right now. This only happens to me on a wakeup from hibernate and with one new laptop (Dell Precision M3800). If this gives you problems, you could try to

RE: Please keep F20 up-to-date (if you can't hold release dates)

2014-10-01 Thread Gerhard Hueller
Hi, Fedora doesn't apply are rolling release model. It applies an API/ABI-stable within one release model. In general, this means, packages can only be upgraded if they do not break these packages' API/ABI. Because Mesa has already been updated twice after the F20 release (9.2 - 10.0 -

Re: Please keep F20 up-to-date (if you can't hold release dates)

2014-10-01 Thread Clemens Eisserer
Hi, Or, if Mesa is your primary concern, you might also contact Felix Schwarz about making a Mesa 10.3 Copr, as he did with 10.1 previously before that hit the distribution — take a look at https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/fschwarz/mesa10/. I used that 10.1 repository before 10.1 was

Re: Please keep F20 up-to-date (if you can't hold release dates)

2014-10-01 Thread Matthew Miller
On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 04:51:50PM +0200, Gerhard Hueller wrote: If you are very eager for the latest — and it sounds like you are! — I encourage you to try the alpha release, or even run Rawhide, as I do. I did that, but rawhide is built with debug compiler options and therefore notably

Re: USB keybord curiosity

2014-10-01 Thread Geoffrey Leach
On 09/30/2014 03:21:59 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 10/01/14 05:44, Geoffrey Leach wrote: What follows is the log output from dmesg and Xorg.0.log. I think this establishes that the keyboard is properly recognized by X and the kernel. (But what do I know?) The question is: is there something

Re: Wrong Screen Resolution after uninstalling nvidia packages from rpmfusion

2014-10-01 Thread jd1008
On 09/30/2014 09:02 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 10/01/14 10:46, jd1008 wrote: On 09/30/2014 05:16 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 10/01/14 07:06, jd1008 wrote: Should I build an Xorg.conf, based on this info? Also Do you get any output from locate blacklist-nouveau.conf $ locate

Re: Wrong Screen Resolution after uninstalling nvidia packages from rpmfusion

2014-10-01 Thread Ed Greshko
On 10/02/14 01:26, jd1008 wrote: It just cannot load nouveau.ko driver because of unresolvable symbols at modprobe time. I think I sent that info to the list already. That isn't the problem. The same unresolved symbols exists on all my systems. [egreshko@f20f ~]$ nm -u

Re: Wrong Screen Resolution after uninstalling nvidia packages from rpmfusion

2014-10-01 Thread jd1008
On 10/01/2014 11:41 AM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 10/02/14 01:26, jd1008 wrote: It just cannot load nouveau.ko driver because of unresolvable symbols at modprobe time. I think I sent that info to the list already. That isn't the problem. The same unresolved symbols exists on all

Re: Please keep F20 up-to-date (if you can't hold release dates)

2014-10-01 Thread Heinz Diehl
On 01.10.2014, Gerhard Hueller wrote: I did that, but rawhide is built with debug compiler options and therefore notably slower While I'm not convinced that there is any significantly slowdown in real use caused by DEBUG, you can do it the easy way: take a look at koji.fedoraproject.org,

Re: Wrong Screen Resolution after uninstalling nvidia packages from rpmfusion

2014-10-01 Thread poma
Upstream/Nouveau http://nouveau.freedesktop.org/wiki/Bugs/ https://bugs.freedesktop.org/buglist.cgi?product=xorgcomponent=Driver%2Fnouveau If you are using packages from your distribution and are unable/unwilling to test the latest versions of all the pieces of nouveau, send the bug

tracking down crash/error in app running on fed/centos

2014-10-01 Thread bruce
Hi guys. running an app in both fed/centos test machines and getting a seg fault. I know this is a bit off topic, but it does related to segfault crashes, and how to get/setup the data to analyze track down the offending code! to begin, the system has /var/log/messages with Sep 30 11:40:57

Re: what causes: kernel:[38405.042543] do_IRQ: 0.81 No irq handler for vector (irq -1)

2014-10-01 Thread Heinz Diehl
On 01.10.2014, Ranjan Maitra wrote: Unfortunately, there are hard lockups. Then, you should definitely report this to the Fedora kernel folks. You can also try with a vanilla kernel from kernel.org, and if the problem persists, you could report it directly to the linux kernel mailing list.

RE: Please keep F20 up-to-date (if you can't hold release dates)

2014-10-01 Thread Gerhard Hueller
Hi Heinz, While I'm not convinced that there is any significantly slowdown in real use caused by DEBUG It is at least with the kernel, as there are some lock-diagnostics turned on, which cause a servre slowdown. Also, I used rawhide a few months and went away after it broke a few times. you

Re: tracking down crash/error in app running on fed/centos

2014-10-01 Thread Jack Craig
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 12:30 PM, bruce badoug...@gmail.com wrote: Hi guys. running an app in both fed/centos test machines and getting a seg fault. I know this is a bit off topic, but it does related to segfault crashes, and how to get/setup the data to analyze track down the offending

Re: what causes: kernel:[38405.042543] do_IRQ: 0.81 No irq handler for vector (irq -1)

2014-10-01 Thread poma
On 01.10.2014 21:34, Heinz Diehl wrote: On 01.10.2014, Ranjan Maitra wrote: Unfortunately, there are hard lockups. Then, you should definitely report this to the Fedora kernel folks. You can also try with a vanilla kernel from kernel.org, and if the problem persists, you could report it

Re: what causes: kernel:[38405.042543] do_IRQ: 0.81 No irq handler for vector (irq -1)

2014-10-01 Thread Ranjan Maitra
On Wed, 1 Oct 2014 21:34:18 +0200 Heinz Diehl htd...@fritha.org wrote: On 01.10.2014, Ranjan Maitra wrote: Unfortunately, there are hard lockups. Then, you should definitely report this to the Fedora kernel folks. Thanks! I have done this. You can also try with a vanilla kernel from

Re: what causes: kernel:[38405.042543] do_IRQ: 0.81 No irq handler for vector (irq -1)

2014-10-01 Thread poma
On 01.10.2014 21:58, Ranjan Maitra wrote: On Wed, 1 Oct 2014 21:34:18 +0200 Heinz Diehl htd...@fritha.org wrote: On 01.10.2014, Ranjan Maitra wrote: Unfortunately, there are hard lockups. Then, you should definitely report this to the Fedora kernel folks. Thanks! I have done this.

Re: Wrong Screen Resolution after uninstalling nvidia packages from rpmfusion

2014-10-01 Thread jd1008
On 10/01/2014 01:10 PM, poma wrote: Upstream/Nouveau http://nouveau.freedesktop.org/wiki/Bugs/ https://bugs.freedesktop.org/buglist.cgi?product=xorgcomponent=Driver%2Fnouveau If you are using packages from your distribution and are unable/unwilling to test the latest versions of all the

Re: Wrong Screen Resolution after uninstalling nvidia packages from rpmfusion

2014-10-01 Thread poma
On 01.10.2014 22:17, jd1008 wrote: On 10/01/2014 01:10 PM, poma wrote: Upstream/Nouveau http://nouveau.freedesktop.org/wiki/Bugs/ https://bugs.freedesktop.org/buglist.cgi?product=xorgcomponent=Driver%2Fnouveau If you are using packages from your distribution and are unable/unwilling

Two disk kickstart

2014-10-01 Thread CLOSE Dave
I'm having a little trouble with kickstart when the target box has more than one disk. In the %pre section of the kickstart file, I create a temporary file based on the number of disks present, then %include that file in the normal part of the kickstart file. The logic is this. d= declare -i

Display resolution -

2014-10-01 Thread Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA
I need to swap monitors as the backlight in my old Dell monitor grows dim. I have a Viewsonic vx2035WM that Fedora can never get the resolution right for. I've gone through the following process using information I found on Google. [root@box7 bobg]# cvt 1680 1050 # 1680x1050 59.95 Hz (CVT

Re: Two disk kickstart

2014-10-01 Thread Tim
Allegedly, on or about 01 October 2014, CLOSE Dave sent: When I have two disks (I've haven't had more thus far), the logic works perfectly. Except... When the machine reboots, it tries to boot from the second disk, sdb, not from sda where the boot loader is. Of course, that doesn't work and