youtube-dl

A new strange behavior of this util. When downloading a format of the file that is pure video (i.e. no audio) I end up with tens of small files each one labeled by the name of the listed movie appended with .part-FragN where N ranges from 0 to more than 200 sometimes. I updated youtube-dl by

Re: Changing umask in fedora24

On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 03:57:18PM -0400, Alex wrote: > Hi, > > I posted a message the other day regarding changing the umask for > users in an apache DocumentRoot on a fedora24 system and haven't > received any responses. Maybe my question too confusing with the > DocumentRoot discussion. > >

Re: Apache and umask for document root

On 10/27/2016 05:48 PM, Alex wrote: > Hi, > To only way to verify the change "took" is to have the httpd process create a file and check the mode of the file created. >>> >>> Yes, thanks. I still need to test it for joomla through the apache >>> user, but as I mentioned in a previous

Re: Apache and umask for document root

Hi, >>> To only way to verify the change "took" is to have the httpd process >>> create a file and check the mode of the file created. >> >> Yes, thanks. I still need to test it for joomla through the apache >> user, but as I mentioned in a previous email a few minutes ago, it >> still appears to

Re: Apache and umask for document root

On 10/27/2016 02:19 PM, Alex wrote: Specifically, uploading new modules have been created with 0644 and 0755. Assume that we don't know what your process is, and be specific about how you're uploading new modules, please. ___ users mailing list --

Re: Apache and umask for document root

On 10/27/2016 04:16 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: Since I was testing a php script that *created* a file, I deleted the file before the second test and loaded the php page via my browser, again. Thank you. I was concerned that you'd forgotten that changes to umask only apply to files created

Re: Apache and umask for document root

On 10/27/2016 02:27 PM, Alex wrote: How is it set for the normal user? I've modified /etc/bashrc (and even /etc/profile), and the apache user doesn't have a .bashrc or .bash_profile, and it's still 0022. It's difficult to tell what you're doing wrong, because you aren't being specific about

Re: Apache and umask for document root

On 10/27/2016 02:14 PM, Joe Zeff wrote: On 10/27/2016 01:57 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: I created a php script that created a new file. Before the change, the file's mode was 0644. After the change, the mode was 0664. Did you run the script after the change, or simply make the change and

Re: GPG2 can't read smartcard

On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 4:42 PM, Corey Sheldon wrote: > > > On 10/27/2016 02:20 AM, Laverne Schrock wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I have several Fedora 24 boxes, all of which have >> /home from NFS. Some of these boxes were fresh >> installs and some are upgrades from 23

Re: Apache and umask for document root

On 10/27/2016 02:27 PM, Alex wrote: > Hi, > > >>> I've actually already done these exact steps, and it doesn't work (on >>> fedora23). When you say you've tested it, do you mean you tested the >>> steps above, or you did something to confirm afterwards that its umask >>> is 0002? >>> >>> # cat

Re: Apache and umask for document root

Hi, >> I've actually already done these exact steps, and it doesn't work (on >> fedora23). When you say you've tested it, do you mean you tested the >> steps above, or you did something to confirm afterwards that its umask >> is 0002? >> >> # cat /etc/systemd/system/httpd.service.d/override.conf

Re: Apache and umask for document root

Hi, On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 4:57 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 10/27/2016 01:44 PM, Alex wrote: >> >> I've actually already done these exact steps, and it doesn't work (on >> fedora23). When you say you've tested it, do you mean you tested the >> steps above, or you

[389-users] Re: Announcing 389 Directory Server 1.3.5.14

On 10/27/2016 05:08 PM, Timo Aaltonen wrote: > On 14.10.2016 18:51, Mark Reynolds wrote: >> 389 Directory Server 1.3.5.14 >> >> The 389 Directory Server team is proud to announce 389-ds-base >> version 1.3.5.14. >> >> Fedora packages are available from the Fedora 24, 25 and >> Rawhide

Re: Apache and umask for document root

On 10/27/2016 01:44 PM, Alex wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 4:09 PM, Gordon Messmer > wrote: >> On 10/25/2016 06:53 PM, Alex wrote: >>> >>> The problem I was having >>> was with the user doing local modifications (joomadmin) not being able >>> to modify files

Re: Apache and umask for document root

On 10/27/2016 01:57 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: I created a php script that created a new file. Before the change, the file's mode was 0644. After the change, the mode was 0664. Did you run the script after the change, or simply make the change and check the mode again?

[389-users] Re: Announcing 389 Directory Server 1.3.5.14

On 14.10.2016 18:51, Mark Reynolds wrote: > > 389 Directory Server 1.3.5.14 > > The 389 Directory Server team is proud to announce 389-ds-base > version 1.3.5.14. > > Fedora packages are available from the Fedora 24, 25 and > Rawhide repositories. > > The new packages and versions are: >

Re: Apache and umask for document root

On 10/27/2016 01:44 PM, Alex wrote: I've actually already done these exact steps, and it doesn't work (on fedora23). When you say you've tested it, do you mean you tested the steps above, or you did something to confirm afterwards that its umask is 0002? I created a php script that created a

Re: Apache and umask for document root

Hi, On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 4:09 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 10/25/2016 06:53 PM, Alex wrote: >> >> The problem I was having >> was with the user doing local modifications (joomadmin) not being able >> to modify files uploaded or changed by the joomla apache user >>

Re: Apache and umask for document root

On 10/25/2016 06:53 PM, Alex wrote: The problem I was having was with the user doing local modifications (joomadmin) not being able to modify files uploaded or changed by the joomla apache user (apache). Numerous suggestions were made, including changing all the files to be sgid write, adding

Changing umask in fedora24

Hi, I posted a message the other day regarding changing the umask for users in an apache DocumentRoot on a fedora24 system and haven't received any responses. Maybe my question too confusing with the DocumentRoot discussion. Does anyone know how to reliably change the umask for regular users

Re: Set system time to 24 hour format (military time)

> > > On 27 October 2016 at 06:13, CS DBA wrote: > >> Hi All; >> >> >> I'm running Fedora 24 (KDE Spin). How can I set the system time format to >> be 24 hour time? >> >> >> > Settings --> Date & Time Choose 24hr vs. AM/PM option. I am on workstation set up but

Re: Build rpm - extract source

On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 2:41 PM Ahmad Samir wrote: > On 27 October 2016 at 14:28, arnaud gaboury > wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 2:11 PM arnaud gaboury > > > wrote: > > > > > > NEW EDIT: the autosetup

Re: Build rpm - extract source

On 27 October 2016 at 14:28, arnaud gaboury wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 2:11 PM arnaud gaboury > wrote: > > > NEW EDIT: the autosetup command as described above works indeed. The culprit > was a line before poorly commented by #, which

Re: Build rpm - extract source

On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 2:11 PM arnaud gaboury wrote: > On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 12:47 PM arnaud gaboury > wrote: > > Here is part of my spec file: > > --- > Name: mattermost > Version: 3.4.0 >

Re: Build rpm - extract source

On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 12:47 PM arnaud gaboury wrote: > Here is part of my spec file: > > --- > Name: mattermost > Version: 3.4.0 > Release: 1%{?dist} > Summary: Mattermost is an open source, self-hosted Slack-alternative >

Build rpm - extract source

Here is part of my spec file: --- Name: mattermost Version: 3.4.0 Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: Mattermost is an open source, self-hosted Slack-alternative URL: http://www.mattermost.org Source0: