On 9/28/18 2:28 PM, Dave Ulrick wrote:
Thanks, that makes sense. Any idea of why unlink()ing the file seems
to be faster than truncating it?
As best I understand it, one process is async and parallel:
unlink, clear block list, sync to disk
open, write, close, sync to disk
Where the other
On 9/28/18 3:13 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
I am a new smart phone.
Bus 001 Device 008: ID 0e8d:2008 MediaTek Inc.
It shows up in the mounted volume
Unknown (application/octet-stream)
volume mtp
I don't know what this means.
and I can navigate.
I assume you mean that it shows up in
On 9/29/18 8:04 AM, ToddAndMargo wrote:
> My main reason for posting was to show the update process, in
> case anyone else wanted to give it a try
Oh, that's all? Not that it worked well?
Then maybe just post a link to the "official" process? It does go into greater
detail about what to do
On 9/28/18 4:46 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 9/29/18 6:46 AM, ToddAndMargo wrote:
On 9/28/18 3:13 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Fri, 2018-09-28 at 11:48 -0700, ToddAndMargo wrote:
Hi All,
I just upgraded one of my machines to FC29 Beta. Looks
pretty. Haven't had a chance to play with it
On 9/29/18 6:46 AM, ToddAndMargo wrote:
> On 9/28/18 3:13 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>> On Fri, 2018-09-28 at 11:48 -0700, ToddAndMargo wrote:
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> I just upgraded one of my machines to FC29 Beta. Looks
>>> pretty. Haven't had a chance to play with it yet.
>>>
>>> -T
>>>
>>>
On 9/28/18 8:20 AM, ToddAndMargo wrote:
Hi All,
Anyone have a favorite program that will make a map of
your local network?
Many thanks,
-T
I found this:
https://nmap.org/book/zenmap-topology.html
___
users mailing list --
Thanks for the information,
On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 2:48 PM ToddAndMargo wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I just upgraded one of my machines to FC29 Beta. Looks
> pretty. Haven't had a chance to play with it yet.
>
> -T
>
> Here are my upgrade notes;
>
>
> FC 28 -->> FC 29:
>
> # rpm --rebuilddb
> # rpm
On 9/28/18 3:13 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Fri, 2018-09-28 at 11:48 -0700, ToddAndMargo wrote:
Hi All,
I just upgraded one of my machines to FC29 Beta. Looks
pretty. Haven't had a chance to play with it yet.
-T
Here are my upgrade notes;
FC 28 -->> FC 29:
# rpm --rebuilddb
# rpm
Let us know how it goes!
On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 2:48 PM ToddAndMargo wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I just upgraded one of my machines to FC29 Beta. Looks
> pretty. Haven't had a chance to play with it yet.
>
> -T
>
> Here are my upgrade notes;
>
>
> FC 28 -->> FC 29:
>
> # rpm --rebuilddb
> # rpm -Va
On Fri, 2018-09-28 at 11:48 -0700, ToddAndMargo wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I just upgraded one of my machines to FC29 Beta. Looks
> pretty. Haven't had a chance to play with it yet.
>
> -T
>
> Here are my upgrade notes;
>
>
> FC 28 -->> FC 29:
>
> # rpm --rebuilddb
> # rpm -Va --nofiles
On Fri, 28 Sep 2018, Greg Woods wrote:
When an existing file is truncated, which the shell does when you use
stdout redirection, all the blocks that were in it have to be moved to the
file system's free block list. Exactly what happens there may depend on
what kind of file system you are using,
On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 2:37 PM Dave Ulrick wrote:
> Update:
>
> > $ time cat infile >outfile
> >
> > If 'infile' is on the order of 140 MB, 'time' might show something as
> low as:
> >
> > real 0m0.146s
> > user 0m0.000s
> > sys 0m0.109s
> > CPU % 74.29
> >
> > or as high as:
> >
> > real
Update:
Sorry to reply to my own post, but...
After posting the following I realized that it can't be just a stdout
redirect issue in view of the fact that I can recreate the same issue if I
fopen(, "w") a disk file from a C program. I've modified the subject
accordingly.
Dave
On Fri,
While debugging a custom program that can write large output files to
stdout, I noticed that the run time as displayed by the Bash 'time' prefix
wildly varied from run to run. It turns out that the issue isn't just with
my program. I can recreate it with 'cat':
$ time cat infile >outfile
If
>>> From: "Alberto Viana"
>>> To: "General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project."
<389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>
>>> Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2018 6:15:46 PM
>>> Subject: [389-users] error moving an user
>>>
>>> Hey Guys,
>>>
>>> 389 version:
Hi All,
I just upgraded one of my machines to FC29 Beta. Looks
pretty. Haven't had a chance to play with it yet.
-T
Here are my upgrade notes;
FC 28 -->> FC 29:
# rpm --rebuilddb
# rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest
if anything is too new, do a
# dnf downgrade offender(s)
# dnf
On Fri, 2018-09-28 at 16:32 +0100, Dave Cross wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Sep 2018 at 12:33, Patrick O'Callaghan
> wrote:
> >
> > I'm looking for a simple terminal-based viewer for Markdown files. I
> > *don't* want an editor. Think 'less', not 'emacs'. I don't mind if it
> > wants to pop up a window
On Mon, 24 Sep 2018 at 12:33, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>
> I'm looking for a simple terminal-based viewer for Markdown files. I
> *don't* want an editor. Think 'less', not 'emacs'. I don't mind if it
> wants to pop up a window to show rich text, but it's not critical.
How simple do you want
On 9/28/18 11:49 AM, Stephen Morris wrote:
> I switched my wife definition in networkmanager back to "Store password for
> this
> user only (encrypted)" and that put a uuid entry into the maps area, while I
> was
> watching, that matched the uuid in the ifcfg file with my wifi password.
>
Hi All,
Anyone have a favorite program that will make a map of
your local network?
Many thanks,
-T
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On 09/28/2018 04:13 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
Where is it?
Have you tried running mount in a terminal?
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
Matthew Miller wrote:
> You're not using spot pricing, are you?
>
No.
I'm becoming more convinced that machines get shutdown when load average >
#cores for too long, but it seems rather randomly. The reason I'm asking
here is just in case that is part of fedora cloud, rather than a function
Hello,
I am a new smart phone.
Bus 001 Device 008: ID 0e8d:2008 MediaTek Inc.
T: Bus=01 Lev=01 Prnt=01 Port=00 Cnt=01 Dev#= 9 Spd=480 MxCh= 0
D: Ver= 2.00 Cls=00(>ifc ) Sub=00 Prot=00 MxPS=64 #Cfgs= 1
P: Vendor=0e8d ProdID=2008 Rev=02.23
S: Manufacturer=Blackview
S: Product=A20Pro
S:
On 28/9/18 2:39 pm, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 9/27/18 9:18 PM, Stephen Morris wrote:
Below is my results from listing the properties of both devices, and
from what I can see there doesn't appear to be any properties
relative to the leds on either device, but then I can't say I
understand
24 matches
Mail list logo
