Re: network mystery!!??

On 26/03/2022 10:29, Jack Craig wrote: i have a networking mystery ; i hope someone might give me a clue. i am working to restore a web server to internet access that is failing after att update the att older modem (pace 5238ac) with arris BGW210-700. i have a static ip from att in the

Re: network mystery!!??

On 3/25/22 19:29, Jack Craig wrote: i have a networking mystery ; i hope someone might give me a clue. sample route, ... 10.0.0.101 ws.linuxlighthouse.com (internal IP) 2 packets transmitted, 2 received, 0% packet loss, time 1033ms 10.0.0.1          

network mystery!!??

i have a networking mystery ; i hope someone might give me a clue. i am working to restore a web server to internet access that is failing after att update the att older modem (pace 5238ac) with arris BGW210-700. i have a static ip from att in the range 108.220.213.0/255.255.255.248,

Re: Help configuring internal network

It seems I badly misnterpreted the verb "to give". -- Michael henne...@web.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu "Sorry but your password must contain an uppercase letter, a number, a haiku, a gang sign, a heiroglyph, and the blood of a virgin." --

Re: pipewire and wireplumber

Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2022 01:02:01 -0700 Samuel Sieb wrote Subject: Re: pipewire and wireplumber R. G. Newbury wrote: DJ Delorie wrote Geoffrey Leach writes: Is there a 'Getting Started With pipewire' and/or wireplumber somewhere? Or should they 'just work' and I need to check my connections?

Re: pipewire and wireplumber

Roger Heflin writes: > He has a graphical login session. I very clearly stated that I did not. I boot to a text login prompt, log in, and run "exec xinit .xsession -- -listen tcp -retro" (I have a script for it called "x" :) I've never had much luck getting login managers to run my weird

Re: pipewire and wireplumber

"R. G. Newbury" writes: > If you don't mind answering, was it a Rhode Island Red cockerel or a hen > which you sacrificed to learn these arcane secrets? And, full-moon at > midnight, or dark of the moon? Or did this take moving up to a goat? It took a LOT of googling to find the one person who

Re: pipewire and wireplumber

On Fri, 25 Mar 2022 10:35:55 -0700 Geoffrey Leach wrote: > It appears that I should try rawhide. Short of removing the elevant > packages, is there anything else that I should know about making the > transition? That seems a little drastic! While rawhide is far more stable now than the

Re: pipewire and wireplumber

On Fri, 2022-03-25 at 10:35 -0700, Geoffrey Leach wrote: > It appears that I should try rawhide. Short of removing the elevant > packages, is there anything else that I should know about making the > transition? If you go ahead, note that Rawhide issues should be discussed on the Fedora Test list

Re: pipewire and wireplumber

It appears that I should try rawhide. Short of removing the elevant packages, is there anything else that I should know about making the transition? On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 6:59 AM stan via users < users@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > On Thu, 24 Mar 2022 14:07:27 -0700 > Geoffrey Leach

Re: pipewire and wireplumber

On 25/03/2022 04:42, R. G. Newbury wrote: Geoffrey Leach wrote: Obviously we are guinea pigs for this premature piece of software. Could not agree more with the last sentence. To get audio recognized It works both ways. I have had long term problems with pulseaudio that disappeared when

Re: pipewire and wireplumber

On Thu, 24 Mar 2022 14:07:27 -0700 Geoffrey Leach wrote: > I've just installed Fedora 35 and have discovered to my dismay that > previously-working (not at all sophisticated) audio no longer works. > > Is there a 'Getting Started With pipewire' and/or wireplumber > somewhere? Or should they

Re: pipewire and wireplumber

On Fri, 2022-03-25 at 00:42 -0400, R. G. Newbury wrote: > > > Obviously we are guinea pigs for this premature piece of > > > software. > > Could not agree more with the last sentence. Bear in mind that Fedora is where we are always guinea pigs to some extent. That's part of the deal. poc

Re: pipewire and wireplumber

He has a graphical login session. I am going to guess he is using straight-X windows with one of the ancient simple window managers (twm, mwm). I have used similar setups on set-top boxes where memory is limited and gnome is overcomplicated and often gets in the way of it working. DJ: are

[389-users] Re: unconventional replication, alma 8 master to centos 7 slave: Unable to acquire replica: error: no such replica

Hello Both, I got the 389ds replicated this morning, Thankyou very much for your help. Enjoy your friday -Lewis ___ 389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: pipewire and wireplumber

On 3/24/22 21:49, R. G. Newbury wrote: DJ Delorie wrote Geoffrey Leach writes: Is there a 'Getting Started With pipewire' and/or wireplumber somewhere? Or should they 'just work' and I need to check my connections? As a non-gnome (and non-display-manager) user, I share these .xsession

Re: Help configuring internal network

On 3/25/22 00:48, Tim via users wrote: R. G. Newbury: edit your /etc/hosts file to give the hdhomerun unit a fixed IP address. Tim When has the /etc/hosts file ever given anything an IP address? R. G. Newbury You are correct, and I am completely wrong. A static address for the computer

Re: Help configuring internal network

R. G. Newbury: > edit your /etc/hosts file to give the hdhomerun unit a fixed IP > address. Tim >>> When has the /etc/hosts file ever given anything an IP address? R. G. Newbury >>> You are correct, and I am completely wrong. A static address for >>> the computer would be set by editing