> On 17 Jul 2023, at 22:15, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>
> That would imply that either all entries are shifted, or none are,
> which is not what I observe.
You have confirmed that the system powers on at 08:00 BST.
But the logs are for 09:00 when you view them with journalctl for events
On Sat, 2023-07-15 at 23:27 -0700, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
> I have a removable drive sleeve that I mount SATA
> drives mounted in that attaches to an internal SATA
> port. I use it backup my system to removable
> drives. The mechanism works identical to USB
> flash drives.
>
> With one
On 7/17/23 14:17, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Mon, 2023-07-17 at 11:26 -0700, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
How is the "external dock" attached to your
computer? sata? USB?
It's a USB-3 port (independently powered).
poc
Dang!
___
users
On 7/17/23 15:20, Jerry James wrote:
On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 4:15 PM Mike Wright wrote:
There is supposed to be a file that creates the db's system files, sets
an admin and its password, etc. From mariadb-10.5.2 onward it's called
"mariadb-install-db". That file is missing in the rpm for
On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 4:15 PM Mike Wright wrote:
> There is supposed to be a file that creates the db's system files, sets
> an admin and its password, etc. From mariadb-10.5.2 onward it's called
> "mariadb-install-db". That file is missing in the rpm for 10.5.20
> (latest for f38).
$ dnf
I've received enough questions about WordPress that I've decided to
explore it.
I created an F38 virtual and pulled in mariadb, httpd, and wordpress.
mariadb doesn't depend on the other two so I decided to start there.
There is supposed to be a file that creates the db's system files, sets
I got the error again when the install got to that point. I told it to
ignore and continue installing.
I have a usable system.
I did notice on boot an option to edit the EFI firmware. I selected
that and got an error that cannot boot into the EFI editor.
But that is ok. the system is
On Mon, 2023-07-17 at 11:26 -0700, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
> How is the "external dock" attached to your
> computer? sata? USB?
It's a USB-3 port (independently powered).
poc
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe
On Mon, 2023-07-17 at 17:57 +0100, Barry wrote:
>
>
> > On 17 Jul 2023, at 13:46, George N. White III
> > wrote:
> >
> > I see something similar. I assume the system starts on hardware
> > clock time, then
> > after file systems are up the localtime data are used.
>
> Journal entries are all
On 7/17/23 16:07, Michael D. Setzer II wrote:
First computer was a 1963 IBM 1130 with punch cards back in
1975. So started with old machines that still were working.. High
School..
I started with a teletype 55 baudot to a GE MarkV in '66. Best I can
figure out was our school (Euclid OH)
On 17 Jul 2023 at 11:25, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Date sent: Mon, 17 Jul 2023 11:25:31 -0400
To: Community support for Fedora users
From: Robert Moskowitz
Subject:F38 install fails on a Lenovo x120e - Failed to set
new efi boot
I was getting ready to try again.
I pulled the CD drive and tried to get into bios setup, but was not fast
enough and it started booting F38!
It got as far as a things like
[Failed] Failed to start systemd-login.service - User Login Management.
then a bunch more and hung.
So I am going to
Yes, some did have efi back then. i have some fm2 mbs that did. There will
be an option in the bios to enable efi if it does. efi dates to early
itanium systems in 2002. it was so bad it took years to make it to x86
systems. very little was in the classic bios menu and most config was in a
Bios ver is "current", ver 1.17 dated 11/7/2012!
Did we have EFI back then?
Oh, F37 live CD booted fine.
On 7/17/23 13:17, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 11:25 AM Robert Moskowitz wrote:
this system had F22 on it.
I just went through all the steps to blow away the old
On 7/17/23 03:53, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Sun, 2023-07-16 at 16:28 -0700, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 7/16/23 00:05, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 7/15/23 23:27, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
Hi All,
I have a removable drive sleeve that I mount SATA
drives mounted in that
On 7/17/23 11:22, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 7/16/23 23:25, Eyal Lebedinsky wrote:
Did you check if you have
# ls -l '/sys/bus/scsi/devices/1:0:0:0/rescan'
I have '/rescan' but not '/scan'
Not plugged in at boot time, but subsequently
powered up after boot, I have neither "scan"
On 7/16/23 23:25, Eyal Lebedinsky wrote:
Did you check if you have
# ls -l '/sys/bus/scsi/devices/1:0:0:0/rescan'
I have '/rescan' but not '/scan'
Plugged in a boot time, I only have "rescan".
Not plugged in at boot time, but subsequently
powered up after boot, I have neither "scan"
nor
Well
that command gets:
WARNING: UEFI firmware can not be updated in legacy BIOS mode
Then I get a url for fwupd...
Oh, the ethernet is working. Seems it got unplugged from the switch.
Ooops.
Anything else I should try before looking into firmware ver on this
box? Like how to find
On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 1:56 PM Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
> I just recalled. There was a /boot/efi partition on the old F22 setup.
>
> But booting up F37 live now.
If you haven't done so, now would be a good time to update the
laptop's firmware. Get on the latest version.
And the kernel docs
On 7/17/23 01:06, lejeczek via users wrote:
On 16/07/2023 08:27, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
Hi All,
I have a removable drive sleeve that I mount SATA
drives mounted in that attaches to an internal SATA
port. I use it backup my system to removable
drives. The mechanism works identical to
I just recalled. There was a /boot/efi partition on the old F22 setup.
But booting up F37 live now.
On 7/17/23 13:17, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 11:25 AM Robert Moskowitz wrote:
this system had F22 on it.
I just went through all the steps to blow away the old partitions
Well I am going to have to boot off a liveCD.
I have F37 handy. Will try that now and download the F38 one.
Oh I was using the Netinstal. And it had problems with my ethernet. It
worked when I had booted F22 to check things out before then install.
So I had to use the wiFi.
On 7/17/23
On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 11:25 AM Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
> this system had F22 on it.
>
> I just went through all the steps to blow away the old partitions and
> install F38.
>
> It tried for maybe an hour with the spindizzy on "Installing boot loader".
>
> If finally came back with a dialog
It has the AMD E-350 duo core CPU which I am pretty sure is x64.
On 7/17/23 12:58, Barry wrote:
On 17 Jul 2023, at 16:26, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
What should I do at this point. It IS an old system that has had a number of
ver of Fedora on it. It was booting F22 just fine, it seemed but
On 7/17/23 12:18, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Mon, 2023-07-17 at 11:25 -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
this system had F22 on it.
I just went through all the steps to blow away the old partitions and
install F38.
It tried for maybe an hour with the spindizzy on "Installing boot
loader".
> On 17 Jul 2023, at 16:26, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
> What should I do at this point. It IS an old system that has had a number of
> ver of Fedora on it. It was booting F22 just fine, it seemed but now it is
> all gone...
Is it a 64bit system or 32bit? Fedora needs 64bit now.
Barry
> On 17 Jul 2023, at 13:46, George N. White III wrote:
>
> I see something similar. I assume the system starts on hardware clock time,
> then
> after file systems are up the localtime data are used.
Journal entries are all utc and local time is applied only on display with
journalctl is my
On Mon, 2023-07-17 at 11:25 -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> this system had F22 on it.
>
> I just went through all the steps to blow away the old partitions and
> install F38.
>
> It tried for maybe an hour with the spindizzy on "Installing boot
> loader".
>
> If finally came back with a
Hello Team,
we have a multi-master 389-DS enviroment with several suppliers and consumers,
version 389-ds-base-1.3.10.2-10. Lately we are having problems with
replications to the supplier that has enabled the memberof plugin, in order to
replicate the group attribute to the users group
this system had F22 on it.
I just went through all the steps to blow away the old partitions and
install F38.
It tried for maybe an hour with the spindizzy on "Installing boot loader".
If finally came back with a dialog box with an error of:
The following error occurred while installing the
On Mon, 2023-07-17 at 09:45 -0300, George N. White III wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 8:21 AM Patrick O'Callaghan
>
> wrote:
>
> > My system hibernates and powers down at 1:30am, and is woken up by
> > a
> > smart plug powering it on at 8am. This is working (touch wood) and
> > the
> > system
On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 8:21 AM Patrick O'Callaghan
wrote:
> My system hibernates and powers down at 1:30am, and is woken up by a
> smart plug powering it on at 8am. This is working (touch wood) and the
> system verifiably wakes up at 8am. However the journal logs of the
> resume event show 9am,
On Mon, 2023-07-17 at 08:16 +0100, Barry wrote:
> USB-3 is a port with blue insert in it. Older USB are white.
There are some colouring conventions, but it's not a certainty.
--
uname -rsvp
Linux 3.10.0-1160.92.1.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Jun 20 11:48:01 UTC 2023 x86_64
Boilerplate: All
On Sun, Jul 16, 2023 at 6:19 PM Michael Hennebry <
henne...@web.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu> wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Jul 2023, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jul 16, 2023 at 1:54?PM Michael Hennebry
> > wrote:
>
> >> Am I correct about the USB ports?
> >
> > Charging ports may (or may not) carry data. It
My system hibernates and powers down at 1:30am, and is woken up by a
smart plug powering it on at 8am. This is working (touch wood) and the
system verifiably wakes up at 8am. However the journal logs of the
resume event show 9am, even though once fully resumed the time is
correct. The difference
On Sun, 2023-07-16 at 16:28 -0700, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
> On 7/16/23 00:05, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
> > On 7/15/23 23:27, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > I have a removable drive sleeve that I mount SATA
> > > drives mounted in that attaches to an internal
> Am 16.07.2023 um 20:23 schrieb Bill Cunningham :
>
>
> On 7/16/2023 3:41 AM, Peter Boy wrote:
>>
>>> Am 14.07.2023 um 21:59 schrieb Bill Cunningham :
>>>
>>> I have the server edition installed and log into firefox and enter
>>> https://localhost/wp-admin and I always get there's no such
On 16/07/2023 08:27, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
Hi All,
I have a removable drive sleeve that I mount SATA
drives mounted in that attaches to an internal SATA
port. I use it backup my system to removable
drives. The mechanism works identical to USB
flash drives.
With one exception. A
> On 16 Jul 2023, at 22:19, Michael Hennebry
> wrote:
>
> As the device is nailed down and I do not own anything with a USB 3 port,
> recognizing USB 3 ports is a pain.
USB-3 is a port with blue insert in it. Older USB are white.
Barry
___
users
> On 16 Jul 2023, at 22:19, Michael Hennebry
> wrote:
>
> My guess is that the laptop has two USB 3.0 data ports,
> one of which takes a USB C connector.
> My guess is that the USB 3.1 Gen 1 charging port is not a data port.
> Otherwise data would have been mentioned.
>
> I'd prefer to know.
On 17/07/2023 10.11, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 7/15/23 23:27, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
Hi All,
I have a removable drive sleeve that I mount SATA
drives mounted in that attaches to an internal SATA
port. I use it backup my system to removable
drives. The mechanism works
41 matches
Mail list logo
