Re: Who moved my journald.conf?

On Thu, 9 May 2024 15:12:57 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote: > I mean, what if [Journal] means > "Forget everything, we're starting journal options now"? The last > thing you'd want to do is put in a [Journal] line in that case and > forget all the previous settings :-). That's an odd thought in my

Re: Who moved my journald.conf?

On Thu, May 9, 2024 at 5:59 PM Jon LaBadie wrote: > On Thu, May 09, 2024 at 03:45:54PM -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > >On Thu, May 9, 2024 at 3:14 PM Tom Horsley wrote: > > > >> On Thu, 9 May 2024 19:15:20 +0100 > >> Barry Scott wrote: > >> > >> >All options are configured in the

Re: Who moved my journald.conf?

On Thu, May 09, 2024 at 03:45:54PM -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote: On Thu, May 9, 2024 at 3:14 PM Tom Horsley wrote: On Thu, 9 May 2024 19:15:20 +0100 Barry Scott wrote: >All options are configured in the [Journal] section: Yep, but it is concatenating all the different bits and pieces

Re: Cleanup after Failed dnf Upgrade

On 2024-05-09 14:12, Tim Evans wrote: On 5/9/24 5:02 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 2024-05-09 13:59, Tim Evans wrote: Since (I think) the gnome-software app is flat-pack based, have I messed anything up by running its upgrade instead of the dnf/rpm-based one? There are no flatpacks installed by

Re: Cleanup after Failed dnf Upgrade

On 5/9/24 5:02 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 2024-05-09 13:59, Tim Evans wrote: Since (I think) the gnome-software app is flat-pack based, have I messed anything up by running its upgrade instead of the dnf/rpm-based one? There are no flatpacks installed by default.  The gnome-software app is

Re: Cleanup after Failed dnf Upgrade

On 2024-05-09 13:59, Tim Evans wrote: Since (I think) the gnome-software app is flat-pack based, have I messed anything up by running its upgrade instead of the dnf/rpm-based one? There are no flatpacks installed by default. The gnome-software app is definitely not flatpack unless you've

Re: Cleanup after Failed dnf Upgrade

On 5/9/24 4:20 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 2024-05-09 12:50, Tim Evans wrote: Command-line dnf upgrade (F39->F40) failed yesterday, barfing on a missing GPG key for Fedora 40, leaving 2.5GB of rpms sitting in /var/lib/dnf/system-upgrade.  'dnt clean' does not remove these. dnf system-upgrade

Re: Cleanup after Failed dnf Upgrade

On 2024-05-09 12:50, Tim Evans wrote: Command-line dnf upgrade (F39->F40) failed yesterday, barfing on a missing GPG key for Fedora 40, leaving 2.5GB of rpms sitting in /var/lib/dnf/system-upgrade.  'dnt clean' does not remove these. dnf system-upgrade clean Is it safe to manually clear out

Re: Cleanup after Failed dnf Upgrade

On 5/9/24 4:00 PM, Jeffrey Walton wrote: On Thu, May 9, 2024 at 3:51 PM Tim Evans > wrote: Command-line dnf upgrade (F39->F40) failed yesterday, barfing on a missing GPG key for Fedora 40, The key is automatically imported when following

Re: Cleanup after Failed dnf Upgrade

On Thu, May 9, 2024 at 3:51 PM Tim Evans wrote: > Command-line dnf upgrade (F39->F40) failed yesterday, barfing on a > missing GPG key for Fedora 40, The key is automatically imported when following dnf-system-upgrade, <

Cleanup after Failed dnf Upgrade

Command-line dnf upgrade (F39->F40) failed yesterday, barfing on a missing GPG key for Fedora 40, leaving 2.5GB of rpms sitting in /var/lib/dnf/system-upgrade. 'dnt clean' does not remove these. Is it safe to manually clear out this subdirectory? (FWIW, I tried the now-recommended GUI

Re: Who moved my journald.conf?

On Thu, May 9, 2024 at 3:14 PM Tom Horsley wrote: > On Thu, 9 May 2024 19:15:20 +0100 > Barry Scott wrote: > > >All options are configured in the [Journal] section: > > Yep, but it is concatenating all the different bits and pieces > it picks up from the journald.conf.d directory, so is

Re: Who moved my journald.conf?

On Thu, 9 May 2024 19:15:20 +0100 Barry Scott wrote: >All options are configured in the [Journal] section: Yep, but it is concatenating all the different bits and pieces it picks up from the journald.conf.d directory, so is the [Journal] in the default file enough to imply [Journal] for

Re: Who moved my journald.conf?

> On 9 May 2024, at 14:56, Tom Horsley wrote: > >> Yes. See man journald.conf > > I did see the man page, it wasn't clear (not to me, anyway). From the man page: OPTIONS All options are configured in the [Journal] section: Storage= Controls where to store journal

Re: Who moved my journald.conf?

Tom Horsley composed on 2024-05-09 09:15 (UTC-0400): > On Tue, 7 May 2024 14:19:46 -0400 Felix Miata wrote: >>> Where are journal settings configured these days? >> /etc/systemd/journald.conf.d/ for overrides & customizations. > So if I put a .conf file in that directory, does it also need >

Re: virt-viewer vs virt-manager for sound

On Wed, 2024-05-08 at 17:10 -0400, Ranbir wrote: > Is there a plugin or some configuration parameter I'm missing that > would make sound work in virt-viewer without having to passthrough my > headset? Nothing, eh? Well, I'm up shits creek without a paddle because I can't find anything online

Re: Who moved my journald.conf?

On Thu, 9 May 2024 14:22:19 +0100 Barry Scott wrote: > Yes. See man journald.conf I did see the man page, it wasn't clear (not to me, anyway). -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Who moved my journald.conf?

> On 9 May 2024, at 14:15, Tom Horsley wrote: > > So if I put a .conf file in that directory, does it also need > to have the [Journal] line at the beginning? Like so: > > [Journal] > option=setting > option=setting... Yes. See man journald.conf Barry --

Re: Who moved my journald.conf?

On Tue, 7 May 2024 14:19:46 -0400 Felix Miata wrote: > > Where are journal settings configured these days? > > /etc/systemd/journald.conf.d/ for overrides & customizations. So if I put a .conf file in that directory, does it also need to have the [Journal] line at the beginning? Like so:

F40 dual-boot problem, was Re: What is Castor ? Att.Jonathan Billings.

On 08/05/2024 21:57, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 5/8/24 1:13 PM, John Pilkington wrote: On 08/05/2024 20:13, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 5/8/24 10:50 AM, John Pilkington wrote: The harware was working well, before my recent upgrades from f38, briefly to f39 and now to f40.  Then I was using the rpmfusion