(Solved!) Re: Any idea how to solve: upgrade to F40 results in Cisco VPN not finding required libraries

2024-05-17 Thread Ranjan Maitra via users
On Sat May18'24 12:10:31AM, Community Support for Fedora Users wrote: > From: Ranjan Maitra via users > Date: Sat, 18 May 2024 00:10:31 -0500 > To: Community Support for Fedora Users > Cc: Ranjan Maitra > Reply-To: Community support for Fedora users > Subject: Any idea how to solve: upgrade to

Any idea how to solve: upgrade to F40 results in Cisco VPN not finding required libraries

2024-05-17 Thread Ranjan Maitra via users
I have Cisco VPN version cisco-secure-client-linux64-5.0.05040 which is what is the current version released by our workplace. The complete upgrade to Fedora 40 from Fedora 39 appears to have resulted in: You are missing the required libraries for the authentication method you requested.

Re: My Fedora 40 experiences

2024-05-17 Thread Stephen Morris
On 18/5/24 09:19, Jeffrey Walton wrote: On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 5:46 AM Stephen Morris wrote: I used dnf to system-upgrade to F40, which downloaded all the relevant packages, and then I rebooted through dnf. The restart updated all the packages and automatically rebooted

Re: My Fedora 40 experiences

2024-05-17 Thread Stephen Morris
On 17/5/24 22:43, John Pilkington wrote: On 17/05/2024 13:08, francis.montag...@inria.fr wrote: Hi. On Thu, 16 May 2024 23:04:21 +1000 Stephen Morris wrote: On 16/5/24 21:33, George N. White III wrote: Many users have had problems with the akmod-nvida install. For 470xx the module failed

Re: My Fedora 40 experiences

2024-05-17 Thread Jeffrey Walton
On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 5:46 AM Stephen Morris wrote: > I used dnf to system-upgrade to F40, which downloaded all the relevant > packages, and then I rebooted through dnf. > The restart updated all the packages and automatically rebooted when it > was finished. > [...] > This was a lot of work

Re: nmcli -d ??

2024-05-17 Thread Samuel Sieb
On 5/17/24 3:56 AM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: On 5/17/24 03:54, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: Hi All, In CentOS 8, I have the following command:    # nmcli -d    example output:   DEVICE  TYPE  STATE CONNECTION   ens3    ethernet  disconnected  ens3

Re: What have I used too big a hammer on?

2024-05-17 Thread Tim via users
Tom Horsley: > So, my question is: How to override DNS the same way, but only for > my hardwired ethernet connection, while allowing me to disable that > connection and use my hotspot in time of comcast outage? > > Heck, it would be even better if I could use both at the same time, > the local

Re: What have I used too big a hammer on?

2024-05-17 Thread Samuel Sieb
On 5/17/24 8:23 AM, Tom Horsley wrote: Yesterday there were a couple of hours long xfinity cable outages and I decided to try to connect over 5G via my phone's hotspot and the built in wireless on my computer's motherboard. It could connect, but I couldn't see anything on the internet, I

F40 Sendmail "Connection Refused"

2024-05-17 Thread Tim Evans
I have sendmail (sendmail-8.18.1-1.fc40.x86_64) on my three home systems, its purpose being handling of LOCAL-ONLY mail. That is, output from cron jobs, local backup scripts, and the like. (I review these messages using good-ole command-line 'mailx'.) External mail is handled by my hosting

Re: postfix fails to start on boot

2024-05-17 Thread Tom Horsley
On Fri, 17 May 2024 11:13:15 -0400 Alex wrote: > That's what I was looking for, and thought it would fix it, but alas, it > didn't. I have done complete kludgery to solve problems like this by disabling the service that won't start at boot, then adding rc.local entries to use "at" to start the

What have I used too big a hammer on?

2024-05-17 Thread Tom Horsley
Yesterday there were a couple of hours long xfinity cable outages and I decided to try to connect over 5G via my phone's hotspot and the built in wireless on my computer's motherboard. It could connect, but I couldn't see anything on the internet, I suspect because I beat NetworkManager into

Re: postfix fails to start on boot

2024-05-17 Thread Alex
> > I have a fedora38 server with postfix-3.7.9 (although this problem has > > existed for a long time) that fails to start because I believe the server > > has multiple interfaces. > > The issue is that the postfix.service unit has After=network.target > (which is fine for binding to 0.0.0.0 (or

Re: My Fedora 40 experiences

2024-05-17 Thread John Pilkington
On 17/05/2024 13:08, francis.montag...@inria.fr wrote: Hi. On Thu, 16 May 2024 23:04:21 +1000 Stephen Morris wrote: On 16/5/24 21:33, George N. White III wrote: Many users have had problems with the akmod-nvida install. For 470xx the module failed to compile. For newer cards, users

Re: My Fedora 40 experiences

2024-05-17 Thread Francis . Montagnac
Hi. On Thu, 16 May 2024 23:04:21 +1000 Stephen Morris wrote: > On 16/5/24 21:33, George N. White III wrote: >> Many users have had problems with the akmod-nvida install. For 470xx the >> module failed to compile. For newer cards, users sometimes end up with >> unsigned drivers. This usually

Re: nmcli -d ??

2024-05-17 Thread Andrew Pearce
How about nmcli device status Regards Andrew On 17 May 2024 11:55:23 ToddAndMargo via users wrote: Hi All, In CentOS 8, I have the following command: # nmcli -d example output: DEVICE TYPE STATE CONNECTION ens3ethernet disconnected ens3

Re: nmcli -d ??

2024-05-17 Thread ToddAndMargo via users
On 5/17/24 03:54, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: Hi All, In CentOS 8, I have the following command:   # nmcli -d   example output: DEVICE  TYPE  STATE CONNECTION ens3    ethernet  disconnected  ens3 lo  loopback  unmanaged --- But

nmcli -d ??

2024-05-17 Thread ToddAndMargo via users
Hi All, In CentOS 8, I have the following command: # nmcli -d example output: DEVICE TYPE STATE CONNECTION ens3ethernet disconnected ens3 lo loopback unmanaged --- But under Fedora 39, the same command gives me # nmcli

Re: postfix fails to start on boot

2024-05-17 Thread Samuel Sieb
On 5/16/24 6:40 PM, Alex wrote: Hi, I have a fedora38 server with postfix-3.7.9 (although this problem has existed for a long time) that fails to start because I believe the server has multiple interfaces. ifconfig shows just the primary ethernet interface, but "ip addr" shows the rest.