On 6/10/23 16:35, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 6/6/23 01:28, François Patte wrote:
Bonjour,
I am following advices given in answering my previous post "issue"
and I get f38 installer.
The installer complains that there is a duplicate UUID on some disks :
parts sde1 and sdf1
That's true!
On 6/6/23 01:28, François Patte wrote:
Bonjour,
I am following advices given in answering my previous post "issue"
and I get f38 installer.
The installer complains that there is a duplicate UUID on some disks :
parts sde1 and sdf1
That's true! Running blkid gives:
/dev/sde1:
On Fri, 9 Jun 2023 21:56:03 +0200
Peter Boy wrote:
> I probably don’t count as an expert. But software raid introduces a
> property „raid-member“ (not literally but something like that). Each
> raid gets a UUID and all members of a specific raid get the same UUID
> that identifies them as
On Fri, 09 Jun 2023 10:02:19 -0700
"Doug Herr" wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 9, 2023, at 9:38 AM, stan via users wrote:
> > On Fri, 09 Jun 2023 09:48:25 +0200
> > François Patte wrote:
> >
> >> No answer... Is this problem so uncommon? Or so obvious?
> > [snip]
> > It is as if
> > they were
> Am 09.06.2023 um 18:19 schrieb François Patte
> :
Sorry for the delay.
> Le 2023-06-09 14:01, Peter Boy a écrit :
>>> Am 09.06.2023 um 09:48 schrieb François Patte
>>> :
...
Is it possible to unplug one of the disks (say sdf) and make an
install with a raid1 in degraded
> Am 09.06.2023 um 18:38 schrieb stan via users :
>
> On Fri, 09 Jun 2023 09:48:25 +0200
> François Patte wrote:
>
>> No answer... Is this problem so uncommon? Or so obvious?
>
> I haven't seen it even mentioned before and not obvious at all to me.
> Perhaps there is an expert who would
On Fri, Jun 9, 2023, at 9:38 AM, stan via users wrote:
> On Fri, 09 Jun 2023 09:48:25 +0200
> François Patte wrote:
>
>> No answer... Is this problem so uncommon? Or so obvious?
> [snip]
> It is as if
> they were assigned the same UUID *because* they were in a raid. [snip]
That is normal for
On Fri, 09 Jun 2023 09:48:25 +0200
François Patte wrote:
> No answer... Is this problem so uncommon? Or so obvious?
I haven't seen it even mentioned before and not obvious at all to me.
Perhaps there is an expert who would immediately understand what
happened, and how to either fix or
Le 2023-06-09 14:01, Peter Boy a écrit :
Am 09.06.2023 um 09:48 schrieb François Patte
:
...
Is it possible to unplug one of the disks (say sdf) and make an
install with a raid1 in degraded mode (+lvm) then, when the install
is
finished, to plug again the disk sdf and synchronise the
> Am 09.06.2023 um 09:48 schrieb François Patte
> :
>
>> ...
>> Is it possible to unplug one of the disks (say sdf) and make an
>> install with a raid1 in degraded mode (+lvm) then, when the install is
>> finished, to plug again the disk sdf and synchronise the partitions
>> with mdadm?
>>
Le 2023-06-06 10:28, François Patte a écrit :
Bonjour,
I am following advices given in answering my previous post "issue"
and I get f38 installer.
The installer complains that there is a duplicate UUID on some disks :
parts sde1 and sdf1
That's true! Running blkid gives:
/dev/sde1:
Bonjour,
I am following advices given in answering my previous post "issue"
and I get f38 installer.
The installer complains that there is a duplicate UUID on some disks :
parts sde1 and sdf1
That's true! Running blkid gives:
/dev/sde1: UUID="4a28174a-f38b-4938-233f-85f76ce585a8"
12 matches
Mail list logo
