Re: Looking for a .so

2020-05-31 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Sun, 31 May 2020 09:02:51 -0700, Geoffrey Leach wrote: > On Sun, 31 May 2020 16:29:54 +0200 > Andras Simon wrote: > > > 2020-05-31 16:08 UTC+02:00, Geoffrey Leach: > > > I have a build that references '-lz'. This fails, because gcc > > > expects to find libz.so in the library search path.

Re: Looking for a .so

2020-05-31 Thread Geoffrey Leach
On Sun, 31 May 2020 16:29:54 +0200 Andras Simon wrote: > 2020-05-31 16:08 UTC+02:00, Geoffrey Leach : > > I have a build that references '-lz'. This fails, because gcc > > expects to find libz.so in the library search path. The package > > that installs zlib, zlib-1.2.11-21.fc32.x86_64 does not

Re: Looking for a .so

2020-05-31 Thread Tom Horsley
On Sun, 31 May 2020 16:29:54 +0200 Andras Simon wrote: > I think that you need to install zlib-devel. Yep, all the symlinks and such you need to build things are always in the corresponding xxx-devel packages that go with the original xxx package (almost always, anyway).

Re: Looking for a .so

2020-05-31 Thread Andras Simon
2020-05-31 16:08 UTC+02:00, Geoffrey Leach : > I have a build that references '-lz'. This fails, because gcc expects > to find libz.so in the library search path. The package that installs > zlib, zlib-1.2.11-21.fc32.x86_64 does not create a symlink from > libz.so.1.2.11 I think that you need to

Looking for a .so

2020-05-31 Thread Geoffrey Leach
I have a build that references '-lz'. This fails, because gcc expects to find libz.so in the library search path. The package that installs zlib, zlib-1.2.11-21.fc32.x86_64 does not create a symlink from libz.so.1.2.11 So, is this a bug in the package, or am I missing something? This package is