Re: Please help me with samba or my brain will explode.

This is unbelievable! For I coundn't create usershare as i needed, I made a share through smb.conf, that was "guest only" and "force user", and it worked. And after I saw your message, I decided to try again and check all the permissions and acls. I have created new usershare and it is working!

Re: Please help me with samba or my brain will explode.

On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 10:16 AM, Илья Коскин wrote: > Hello everybody. Here is my problem. I have two computers, both with fedora > workstation 27, both with selinux disabled, both fully updated. Both have the > same configuration of samba: > [global] > usershare

Re: Please help me with samba or my brain will explode.

unfortunately it did not helped :( only show me this: open_directory: unable to create Новая папка/Новая папка. Error was NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED d'oh :( ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Please help me with samba or my brain will explode.

i'm not just standing on one point, writing to lists, i already tried to create new shares with another names, tried another directories, even tryed to create not usershare, but smb.conf share: [Shared] path = /home/kasak/Shared guest ok = yes guest only = yes writable = yes so this is not a

Re: Please help me with samba or my brain will explode.

On 13 February 2018 07:16:02 CET, Bill Shirley wrote: >List the [homes] section of testparm. You didn't answer my question >about the missing >path = statement. > I wouldn't expect to see a paths section For [homes] it would map to the home directory of the unix

Re: Please help me with samba or my brain will explode.

I use a path statement in my [homes] section: [homes]     comment = Home Directories     path = /home/%u/windows     browseable = no     valid users = %S     writable = yes     guest ok = no     directory mask = 2770     create mask = 660 Just an FYI. You created

Re: Please help me with samba or my brain will explode.

On Tue, 2018-02-13 at 09:08 +, Илья Коскин wrote: > path statement should not be specified in [homes] section, this is samba > built in section, to > dynamically share user home directories. > > I am not logged in as kasak, samba users is not the same as system users. To > login as kasak,

Re: Please help me with samba or my brain will explode.

Hello Fred. Of course i know about nfs and sshfs. I even know about dav, included in gnome settings, but i have some another machines and it is more comfortable to me, to use samba ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe

Re: Please help me with samba or my brain will explode.

path statement should not be specified in [homes] section, this is samba built in section, to dynamically share user home directories. I am not logged in as kasak, samba users is not the same as system users. To login as kasak, first I need to add kasak to samba with smbpasswd -a kasak, or

Re: Please help me with samba or my brain will explode.

List the [homes] section of testparm. You didn't answer my question about the missing path = statement. You logged in as kasak but the ownership of the created directory is nobody:nobody.  I don't see how that could happen unless you're using a 'force user' and 'force group'. While still

Re: Please help me with samba or my brain will explode.

if that was that simple, I would not write to this list. I have already diff'ed the output of testparm -v and the only difference is "hostname". I don't think that hostname is the problem. Here is magic: [kasak@kasakoff ~]$ smbclient kasakoff\\Shared Enter SAMBA\kasak's password: Try "help"

Re: Please help me with samba or my brain will explode.

Why is there no path = statement for [homes]? Compare the output of 'testparm' from both machines. After creating the 'foo' directory on both machines, compare the permissions of the two directories 'ls -l'. Bill On 2/12/2018 1:16 PM, Илья Коскин wrote: Hello everybody. Here is my problem. I

Re: Please help me with samba or my brain will explode.

Given how open you have this set up I must ask if you have any windows machines on this network that need to communicate with your two systems. If not then some headache reduction may be found in using Linux native file share such as nfs or sshfs. Just a thought. -- Fred