Re: gimmicks for most & a question networking curious/experts - ? MACSEC

2023-06-07 Thread lejeczek via users
de On 06/06/2023 14:50, Chris Adams wrote: Once upon a time, lejeczek said: To start with the most basic of what I ponder over - basic in my mind though I get, that it does not have to be that or simple/obvious - is MACSEC with 'bond' as parent or in other words: macsec "on" a 'bond' network

Re: gimmicks for most & a question networking curious/experts - ? MACSEC

2023-06-06 Thread Roger Heflin
If the bond is an active/passive (non-LACP) then the older setup scripts/bonding module would put the mac address for the first interface it finds on the bond device and on both underlying physical interfaces and in the bond. Using the old scripts/bonding module (with LACP) both underlying

Re: gimmicks for most & a question networking curious/experts - ? MACSEC

2023-06-06 Thread Chris Adams
Once upon a time, lejeczek said: > To start with the most basic of what I ponder over - basic in my > mind though I get, that it does not have to be that or > simple/obvious - is MACSEC with 'bond' as parent or in other words: > macsec "on" a 'bond' network interface. > Should such a "thing"

gimmicks for most & a question networking curious/experts - ? MACSEC

2023-06-06 Thread lejeczek via users
Hi guys. Looking at macsec I've only started - so go easy on me with my possibly trivial questions -  and write here in hope, that some of you have expertise to tell... To start with the most basic of what I ponder over - basic in my mind though I get, that it does not have to be that or