On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 12:13 AM, Eddie G. O'Connor Jr.
eoconno...@gmail.com wrote:
Might this be the UEFI thing that I've been reading up about? I myself
don't even understand how it works, but this sounds like something that
MIGHT be related to that?...just my opinion
Yes, as I
On 11/27/2012 12:21 PM, Jared K. Smith wrote:
Yes, as I understand it the kernel key is used for module signing.
The most obvious new use for module signing is Secure Boot, so that
the kernel will only load modules signed with its key.
Is there one key for each kernel version, or is it
On 11/27/2012 01:21 PM, Jared K. Smith wrote:
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 12:13 AM, Eddie G. O'Connor Jr.
eoconno...@gmail.com wrote:
Might this be the UEFI thing that I've been reading up about? I
myself don't even understand how it works, but this sounds like
something that MIGHT be related to
On 11/27/2012 01:33 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 11/27/2012 12:21 PM, Jared K. Smith wrote:
Yes, as I understand it the kernel key is used for module signing.
The most obvious new use for module signing is Secure Boot, so that
the kernel will only load modules signed with its key.
Is there one key
On 11/27/2012 12:42 PM, JD wrote:
And that begs another question.
THWAP!
No, it doesn't. It *asks* another question. Begging the question
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Begging_the_question) is something
entirely different. Please, either learn what the term means or stop
using it!
--
On 11/27/2012 02:22 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 11/27/2012 12:42 PM, JD wrote:
And that begs another question.
THWAP!
No, it doesn't. It *asks* another question. Begging the question
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Begging_the_question) is something
entirely different. Please, either learn
On 11/27/2012 01:32 PM, JD wrote:
On 11/27/2012 02:22 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 11/27/2012 12:42 PM, JD wrote:
And that begs another question.
THWAP!
No, it doesn't. It *asks* another question. Begging the question
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Begging_the_question) is something
entirely
Jared K. Smith wrote:
Yes, as I understand it the kernel key is used for module signing.
The most obvious new use for module signing is Secure Boot, so
that the kernel will only load modules signed with its key.
JD wrote:
If what you say is true, then the kernel config option
You used a technical term incorrectly. How is it a waste of bandwidth
to correct you and show you how it should be used? Or is it simply that
you don't want to learn to use it correctly?
Well you please take your pointless arguing somewhere else. Especially if
you are going to start
Linus is watching you.
Best,
Christopher Svanefalk
mob: +46762628251
skype: csvanefalk
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 7:59 AM, JD jd1...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/25/2012 11:46 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 11/26/2012 01:11 AM, JD wrote:
I was building kernel 3.7-0.rc6.git.fc19 and during the
2012/11/26 Christopher Svanefalk christopher.svanef...@gmail.com
Linus is watching you.
Best,
Christopher Svanefalk
mob: +46762628251
skype: csvanefalk
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 7:59 AM, JD jd1...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/25/2012 11:46 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 11/26/2012 01:11
On 11/26/2012 01:59 AM, JD wrote:
On 11/25/2012 11:46 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 11/26/2012 01:11 AM, JD wrote:
I was building kernel 3.7-0.rc6.git.fc19 and during the build
I saw this:
Generating a 4096 bit RSA private key
Only 4096 Is that strong enough Shouldn't it be
I was building kernel 3.7-0.rc6.git.fc19 and during the build
I saw this:
Generating a 4096 bit RSA private key
.++
On 11/26/2012 01:11 AM, JD wrote:
I was building kernel 3.7-0.rc6.git.fc19 and during the build
I saw this:
Generating a 4096 bit RSA private key
Only 4096 Is that strong enough Shouldn't it be 8192? :)
.++
On 11/25/2012 11:46 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 11/26/2012 01:11 AM, JD wrote:
I was building kernel 3.7-0.rc6.git.fc19 and during the build
I saw this:
Generating a 4096 bit RSA private key
Only 4096 Is that strong enough Shouldn't it be 8192? :)
.++
15 matches
Mail list logo
