Fedora 28.
Why is Rstudio 0.99.467 ?
When I start it Rstudio tells me that there is a newer 1.1.456
Just wondering.
--
--
/\_/\
|O O| pepeb...@gmail.com
Javier Perez
While the night runs
toward the day...
m m
Suse Shi wrote:
> # dnf update
> Last metadata expiration check: 1:12:38 ago on Mon 27 Aug 2018 08:52:21 AM
> CST.
> Dependencies resolved.
>
> Problem: cannot install both
> gstreamer1-plugins-ugly-free-1.12.5-1.fc27.x86_64 and
> gstreamer1-plugins-ugly-free-1.12.4-2.fc27.x86_64
> - package
On 08/26/2018 06:59 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 08/27/18 09:53, ToddAndMargo wrote:
Possibly open a ticket at
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issues?status=Open=outage
Found it: bugzilla-ow...@redhat.com
Good. I was just about to send a followup to indicate I was wrong. Going to
# dnf update
Last metadata expiration check: 1:12:38 ago on Mon 27 Aug 2018 08:52:21 AM
CST.
Dependencies resolved.
Problem: cannot install both
gstreamer1-plugins-ugly-free-1.12.5-1.fc27.x86_64 and
gstreamer1-plugins-ugly-free-1.12.4-2.fc27.x86_64
- package
On 08/27/18 09:53, ToddAndMargo wrote:
> On 08/26/2018 06:42 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> On 08/27/18 08:46, ToddAndMargo wrote:
>>> On 08/26/2018 05:22 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 08/27/18 08:05, ToddAndMargo wrote:
> My problem is with posting (submit) a bug.
>
> The rpm of firefox was
On 08/26/2018 06:42 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 08/27/18 08:46, ToddAndMargo wrote:
On 08/26/2018 05:22 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 08/27/18 08:05, ToddAndMargo wrote:
My problem is with posting (submit) a bug.
The rpm of firefox was to let you what browser I am using.
I have since duplicated the
On 08/27/18 08:46, ToddAndMargo wrote:
> On 08/26/2018 05:22 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> On 08/27/18 08:05, ToddAndMargo wrote:
>>> My problem is with posting (submit) a bug.
>>>
>>> The rpm of firefox was to let you what browser I am using.
>>> I have since duplicated the issue with Brave.
>>
>>
>>
On Sun, 26 Aug 2018 15:49:06 -0700, ToddAndMargo wrote:
> I am told elsewhere that this is not the proper syntax:
>
> /etc/modprobe.d/iptables.conf add
>
> nf_conntrack_ftp ports=21
>
> Anyone know what the right syntax is?
man modprobe.d
and
man modprobe.conf
On 08/26/2018 03:49 PM, ToddAndMargo wrote:
I am told elsewhere that this is not the proper syntax:
/etc/modprobe.d/iptables.conf add
nf_conntrack_ftp ports=21
Anyone know what the right syntax is?
Many thanks,
-T
Thank you all. I had lost the "options" in my
notes somehow, but it
On 08/26/2018 05:22 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 08/27/18 08:05, ToddAndMargo wrote:
My problem is with posting (submit) a bug.
The rpm of firefox was to let you what browser I am using.
I have since duplicated the issue with Brave.
OK, I don't have a BZ to submit.
Any idea of a contact for
On 08/24/2018 08:59 PM, ToddAndMargo wrote:
3) in /etc/modprobe.d/iptables.conf add
nf_conntrack_ftp ports=21
options nf_conntrack_ftp ports=21
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On 08/27/18 06:49, ToddAndMargo wrote:
> I am told elsewhere that this is not the proper syntax:
>
> /etc/modprobe.d/iptables.conf add
>
> nf_conntrack_ftp ports=21
>
> Anyone know what the right syntax is?
>
>
I believe you want
options nf_conntrack_ftp ports=21
--
Conjecture is just a
On 08/27/18 06:49, ToddAndMargo wrote:
> I am told elsewhere that this is not the proper syntax:
>
> /etc/modprobe.d/iptables.conf add
>
> nf_conntrack_ftp ports=21
>
> Anyone know what the right syntax is?
>
>
I believe you want
options nf_conntrack_ftp ports=21
--
Conjecture is just a
On 08/27/18 08:05, ToddAndMargo wrote:
> My problem is with posting (submit) a bug.
>
> The rpm of firefox was to let you what browser I am using.
> I have since duplicated the issue with Brave.
OK, I don't have a BZ to submit.
--
Conjecture is just a conclusion based on incomplete
On 08/26/2018 03:49 PM, ToddAndMargo wrote:
I am told elsewhere that this is not the proper syntax:
/etc/modprobe.d/iptables.conf add
nf_conntrack_ftp ports=21
Anyone know what the right syntax is?
options nf_conntrack_ftp ports=21
___
users
On 08/26/2018 04:32 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 08/27/18 06:41, ToddAndMargo wrote:
Hi All,
$ rpm -qa firefox
firefox-61.0.2-3.fc28.x86_64
Is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com
down?
When you submit your bug, it times out with
Bad Request
Your browser sent a request that this server
On Mon, 27 Aug 2018 07:47:33 +0800
Ed Greshko wrote:
> Is it September already?
I just remembered seeing the notice, but didn't remember the
date :-).
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On 08/27/18 07:37, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Aug 2018 15:41:20 -0700
> ToddAndMargo wrote:
>
>> down?
> Yes, there was a notice the other day that they'd be moving the
> server and doing upgrades which would take a long time.
According to BZ...
Bugzilla will be offline for an upgrade to
On 08/27/18 06:41, ToddAndMargo wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> $ rpm -qa firefox
> firefox-61.0.2-3.fc28.x86_64
>
> Is
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com
>
> down?
>
> When you submit your bug, it times out with
>
> Bad Request
>
> Your browser sent a request that this server could
> not
On Sun, 26 Aug 2018 15:41:20 -0700
ToddAndMargo wrote:
> down?
Yes, there was a notice the other day that they'd be moving the
server and doing upgrades which would take a long time.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
Hi All,
$ rpm -qa firefox
firefox-61.0.2-3.fc28.x86_64
Is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com
down?
When you submit your bug, it times out with
Bad Request
Your browser sent a request that this server could
not understand. Apache Server at bugzilla.redhat.com
Port 443
-T
I am told elsewhere that this is not the proper syntax:
/etc/modprobe.d/iptables.conf add
nf_conntrack_ftp ports=21
Anyone know what the right syntax is?
Many thanks,
-T
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe
On 08/26/2018 04:25 PM, SternData wrote:
On 08/26/2018 02:22 PM, Doug wrote:
On 08/26/2018 02:03 PM, SternData wrote:
If you've been gritting your teeth about Shutter not working on Wayland,
it's time to rejoice.
I've been compiling flameshot from github
On 08/26/2018 02:22 PM, Doug wrote:
>
> On 08/26/2018 02:03 PM, SternData wrote:
>> If you've been gritting your teeth about Shutter not working on Wayland,
>> it's time to rejoice.
>>
>> I've been compiling flameshot from github
>> (https://github.com/lupoDharkael/flameshot) , but I see it's now
On 08/26/2018 02:03 PM, SternData wrote:
If you've been gritting your teeth about Shutter not working on Wayland,
it's time to rejoice.
I've been compiling flameshot from github
(https://github.com/lupoDharkael/flameshot) , but I see it's now part of
the fedora repos.
dnf install flameshot
If you've been gritting your teeth about Shutter not working on Wayland,
it's time to rejoice.
I've been compiling flameshot from github
(https://github.com/lupoDharkael/flameshot) , but I see it's now part of
the fedora repos.
dnf install flameshot
--
-- Steve
On Fri, 2018-08-24 at 09:20 +1000, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> The .mov and .mp4 extensions should hold ISO14496 files; ISO14496 is
> a container format and doesn't prescribe a specific video data
> format.
As far as I was aware (with over 2 decades of working in video
production), there never was
Dear 389 members.
I try to find some documentation about 1.4.0 version on
http://www.port389.org/docs/389ds/documentation.html is there one?
Is there a bigger information what's was changed in 1.4 as I haven't found any
informatin on http://www.port389.org/whats_new.html or
28 matches
Mail list logo
