[strongSwan] Cisco IPSec VPN with StrongSwan across CGNAT

2016-04-05 Thread Chandrasekhar S
Hi, We are working to setup an IPSec PSK VPN between the 4G router and StrongSwan which resides on a public server in road warrior configuration, with the 4G router being the road warrior clients. Cisco 819 4G router ( Road warrior client) ---CGNAT --

Re: [strongSwan] Query for Mobike responder behavior

2016-04-05 Thread Mukesh Yadav
Thanks Tobias... That clears a lot... Besides mobike, you mentioned that when exchange is done on 4500 and no NATT detected. Strong swan sends ESP as non-UDP encapsulated. Going by some reference earlier, I recall, even if no NATT detected and still initiator using port 4500 for Ikev2. It can be

Re: [strongSwan] Query for Mobike responder behavior

2016-04-05 Thread Tobias Brunner
Hi Mukesh, > Crux of this para is that if NAT traversal and mobike both are supported > at both IPsec end-points, then implementation shall change to port 4500. > > Both peers support NAT traversal will be found at IKE_SA_INIT exchange > and Mobike support will be found after IKE_AUTH exchange