If I recall correctly, the spell check in versions of OO.o Writer worked
out of the box. Do I recall correctly? If so, why was that changed?
--David
On 12/27/2009 2:33 AM, Larry Gusaas wrote:
On 2009/12/27 1:05 AM John Palmisano wrote:
As per instructions here, I am emailing support:
I hope and trust that many OOo users will find this article (
http://preview.tinyurl.com/yzx8ok3 ) relevant and of interest
Henri
On 12/27/2009 8:19 AM, M Henri Day wrote:
I hope and trust that many OOo users will find this article (
http://preview.tinyurl.com/yzx8ok3 ) relevant and of interest
Henri
The link is slightly broken:
*http://www.groklaw.net/articlebasic.php?story=20071023002351958*
M Henri Day wrote:
I hope and trust that many OOo users will find this article (
http://preview.tinyurl.com/yzx8ok3 ) relevant and of interest
Henri
That's old news and simply more of the same old, same old. More
recently, they've been trying to move that OOXML standard closer to
2009/12/27 John Meyer pueblonat...@opensuse.us
On 12/27/2009 8:19 AM, M Henri Day wrote:
I hope and trust that many OOo users will find this article (
http://preview.tinyurl.com/yzx8ok3 ) relevant and of interest
Henri
The link is slightly broken:
2009/12/27 James Knott james.kn...@rogers.com
M Henri Day wrote:
I hope and trust that many OOo users will find this article (
http://preview.tinyurl.com/yzx8ok3 ) relevant and of interest
Henri
That's old news and simply more of the same old, same old. More recently,
they've been
Twayne wrote:
Behold the writings of Barbara Duprey from b...@onr.com who wrote:
Dwight Hines wrote:
Dear OpenOffice User'sGroup, Digest and Non-Digest Divisions:
I like using OpenOffice. I like the philosophy. I like the style
of most of the people who use it. I like knowing that there
M Henri Day wrote:
2009/12/27 James Knottjames.kn...@rogers.com
M Henri Day wrote:
I hope and trust that many OOo users will find this article (
http://preview.tinyurl.com/yzx8ok3 ) relevant and of interest
Henri
That's old news and simply more of the same old,
I know that most windows managers can handle this. Which windows
manager are you using (Gnome, KDE, Windows)?
I'm using WindowsXP with SP3, and OOo 3.1.1.
Check grouping in the taskbar options.
--
Dotan Cohen
http://what-is-what.com
http://gibberish.co.il
On 2009/12/27 7:27 AM David B Teague wrote:
If I recall correctly, the spell check in versions of OO.o Writer
worked out of the box.
It usually does.
Do I recall correctly?
Yes
If so, why was that changed?
It hasn't. No software works perfectly for everyone.
--
Larry I. Gusaas
Here is the correct link to the article, one that does not go to a scam
site:
http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=2009122612211929
It's not very smart to either send or follow the scam links nor to
tolerate people that, for whatever reason, send scam links to a public
mailing lists.
Scam links? Are you talking about URL shortening sites?
On 12/27/2009 11:19 AM, Lars Nooden wrote:
Here is the correct link to the article, one that does not go to a scam
site:
http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=2009122612211929
It's not very smart to either send or follow the
2009/12/27 Lars Nooden larsnoo...@openoffice.org
Here is the correct link to the article, one that does not go to a scam
site:
http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=2009122612211929
It's not very smart to either send or follow the scam links nor to
tolerate people that, for
John Meyer wrote:
Scam links? Are you talking about URL shortening sites?
Tom-A-to, To-MAH-to.
http://www.webpronews.com/topnews/2009/08/25/short-url-spam-a-big-threat-in-august
http://news.cnet.com/8301-1009_3-10281599-83.html
While I would say that using a shorturl on an e-mail site is a bit
apropos, I would disagree with the short-urls automatically equal spam.
They have their time and place, notably in portable communications. I
would wish that more clients would include software to automatically
lengthen out
M Henri Day wrote:
2009/12/27 Lars Nooden larsnoo...@openoffice.org
Here is the correct link to the article, one that does not go to a scam
site:
http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=2009122612211929
It's not very smart to either send or follow the scam links nor to
tolerate
2009/12/27 Lars Nooden larsnoo...@openoffice.org
M Henri Day wrote:
2009/12/27 Lars Nooden larsnoo...@openoffice.org
Here is the correct link to the article, one that does not go to a scam
site:
http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=2009122612211929
It's not very smart
John Meyer wrote:
While I would say that using a shorturl on an e-mail site is a bit
apropos, I would disagree with the short-urls automatically equal
spam.
Close enough for government work. The Groklaw article is good and very
relevant to OOo use. Linking to it via a scam site may have
On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 11:53:46 AM -0700, John Meyer wrote:
While I would say that using a shorturl on an e-mail site is a bit
apropos, I would disagree with the short-urls automatically equal
spam.
They are not always spam, far from it, but create several problems it
would be bad to ignore:
M. Fioretti wrote:
...create several problems it would be bad to ignore:
http://joshua.schachter.org/2009/04/on-url-shorteners.html
http://blog.grumet.net/2009/04/03/url-shorteners-are-bad-for-the-web
http://www.scripting.com/stories/2009/08/19/howtofixurlshorteners.html
so the less
On 2009/12/27 12:59 PM Lars Nooden wrote:
M Henri Day wrote:
Sure you can ask. Here is the offending message.
It's not hard to read in the header who sent it:
http://www.openoffice.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=usersmsgNo=201476
There is nothing offensive about that message. It goes
In Base, how can text fields have a dropdown box showing existing data
if a certain condition is met?
At a lab I work at, we process requests from different local
companies. The first field is for the area, and the second field is
for the company name. I want only the companies shown that are
2009/12/27 M. Fioretti mfiore...@nexaima.net
On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 11:53:46 AM -0700, John Meyer wrote:
While I would say that using a shorturl on an e-mail site is a bit
apropos, I would disagree with the short-urls automatically equal
spam.
They are not always spam, far from it, but
Larry Gusaas wrote:
On 2009/12/27 7:27 AM David B Teague wrote:
If I recall correctly, the spell check in versions of OO.o Writer
worked out of the box.
It usually does.
Do I recall correctly?
Yes
If so, why was that changed?
It hasn't. No software works perfectly for everyone.
On 12/27/2009 1:15 PM, Lars Nooden wrote:
John Meyer wrote:
While I would say that using a shorturl on an e-mail site is a bit
apropos, I would disagree with the short-urls automatically equal
spam.
Close enough for government work. The Groklaw article is good and very
relevant to OOo
Lars Nooden wrote:
Here is the correct link to the article, one that does not go to a scam
site:
http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=2009122612211929
It's not very smart to either send or follow the scam links nor to
tolerate people that, for whatever reason, send scam links to
Lars Nooden wrote:
Here is the correct link to the article, one that does not go to a scam
site:
http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=2009122612211929
It's not very smart to either send or follow the scam links nor to
tolerate people that, for whatever reason, send scam links to a
Some time ago I upgraded to versions 3.0 and beyond and I tried to change
the directory for the templates.
I have changed the Paths information pointing to the templates, but still
it keeps reporting to me that it cannot find the templates, and give me
error messages saying:
quote
Error
scalc does not understand any Date pasted as DDMMAA even though it
is able to represent =TODAY() using this format.
Often I need to paste dates as Text and calculate days by head.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
At 02:04 28/12/2009 -0200, Pedro Izecksohn wrote:
[]calc does not understand any Date pasted as DDMMAA even though it
is able to represent =TODAY() using this format.
As so often, Paste Special is your friend. Instead of using ordinary Paste:
o Go to Edit | Paste Special... (or right-click |
30 matches
Mail list logo
