fraser.ad...@blueyonder.co.uk
To: users@qpid.apache.org
Sent: Monday, September 8, 2014 2:07:23 PM
Subject: Re: proton Messenger error handling/recovery REQUEST FEEDBACK!
Messenger gurus seem to be keeping their heads down a bit.
Is it *really* just Alan and I who are interested
On Mon, 2014-09-08 at 19:07 +0100, Fraser Adams wrote:
Messenger gurus seem to be keeping their heads down a bit.
Is it *really* just Alan and I who are interested to understand the
error handling/reconnection behaviour of Messenger?
Is anybody using it in industrial strength applications
On 09/09/2014 10:59 AM, Alan Conway wrote:
On Mon, 2014-09-08 at 19:07 +0100, Fraser Adams wrote:
Messenger gurus seem to be keeping their heads down a bit.
Is it *really* just Alan and I who are interested to understand the
error handling/reconnection behaviour of Messenger?
Is anybody
On 09/09/2014 03:59 PM, Alan Conway wrote:
On Mon, 2014-09-08 at 19:07 +0100, Fraser Adams wrote:
Messenger gurus seem to be keeping their heads down a bit.
Is it *really* just Alan and I who are interested to understand the
error handling/reconnection behaviour of Messenger?
Is anybody using
- Original Message -
From: Fraser Adams fraser.ad...@blueyonder.co.uk
To: users@qpid.apache.org
Sent: Monday, September 8, 2014 2:07:23 PM
Subject: Re: proton Messenger error handling/recovery REQUEST FEEDBACK!
Messenger gurus seem to be keeping their heads down a bit
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 5:22 PM, Alan Conway acon...@redhat.com wrote:
Given that engine is already a more complete and flexible API (in the
sense of offering full low-level access to the entire AMQP protocol),
and that people are demonstrating that it can be made easier to use by
layering
Messenger gurus seem to be keeping their heads down a bit.
Is it *really* just Alan and I who are interested to understand the
error handling/reconnection behaviour of Messenger?
Is anybody using it in industrial strength applications or is it just
being used in quick and dirty demos?
On Thu, 2014-09-04 at 18:28 +0100, Fraser Adams wrote:
On 03/09/14 23:29, Alan Conway wrote:
On Wed, 2014-09-03 at 20:05 +0100, Fraser Adams wrote:
Hello,
I've probably missed something, but I don't know how to reliably detect
failures and reconnect.
So if I sent to an address with a