Thanks, I patiently await the fix. I am not in a hurry. Thanks for keeping
me posted, Jos
_
From: users-boun...@racket-lang.org [mailto:users-boun...@racket-lang.org]
On Behalf Of James Swaine
Sent: 17 May 2011 07:02
To: users@racket-lang.org
Subject: Re: [racket] future on dual
Are you sure you output the A-list in write-mode?
Using display (or (printf ~a A-list)) would give you exactly the output
you describe.
You may want to use symbol? and string? in order to inspect the input.
Jos
_
From: users-boun...@racket-lang.org [mailto:users-boun...@racket-lang.org]
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 7:12 AM, Russell Adams
rlad...@adamsinfoserv.com wrote:
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 11:34:39PM -0600, Ryan Culpepper wrote:
On 05/16/2011 09:38 PM, Russell Adams wrote:
Folks,
I'm incredibly pleased with rackunit, having just used it on a funky
piece of parsing code,
On May 17, 2011, at 8:12 AM, Russell Adams wrote:
I didn't need the case or suite functionality yet.
You did. That's what your long post says, but you probably didn't realize it.
-- Matthias
_
For list-related administrative tasks:
While we're at it: any chance of getting a test-on-entry-point for Rackunit as
I described a while ago is available in Python? -- Matthias
_
For list-related administrative tasks:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
YES! That would also solve the problems with Kathy's test engine. Indeed, we
could just replace test engine with rackunit in *sl. -- Matthias
On May 17, 2011, at 9:06 AM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
At Tue, 17 May 2011 08:57:26 -0400, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
While we're at it: any chance of
40 minutes ago, Matthew Flatt wrote:
At Tue, 17 May 2011 08:57:26 -0400, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
While we're at it: any chance of getting a test-on-entry-point for
Rackunit as I described a while ago is available in Python?
I think we would want to implement it as a `#lang' mix-in
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 07:40:14AM -0500, Robby Findler wrote:
I had tried run-tests with 'verbose, and define-test-suite. I really
just have a file full of checks currently, I didn't need the case or
suite functionality yet.
(not to be a pita, but maybe you do! :)
Robby
I did try
(test/gui test-suite)
On May 17, 2011, at 10:14 AM, Russell Adams wrote:
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 07:40:14AM -0500, Robby Findler wrote:
I had tried run-tests with 'verbose, and define-test-suite. I really
just have a file full of checks currently, I didn't need the case or
suite
On 05/17/2011 06:12 AM, Russell Adams wrote:
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 11:34:39PM -0600, Ryan Culpepper wrote:
On 05/16/2011 09:38 PM, Russell Adams wrote:
Folks,
I'm incredibly pleased with rackunit, having just used it on a funky
piece of parsing code, however I encountered a minor issue.
How do I write URLs with hyperlinks in a slideshow?
I tried something like:
(require (only-in scribble/base url))
(slide
#:title Want more?
(t (url http://racket-lang.org;)))
= but it is a contract violation...
[]'s
Rodolfo Carvalho
(PS: previous message was waiting for moderation because
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 10:35:26AM -0400, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
(test/gui test-suite)
That's nice, but who uses a gui?
--
Russell Adamsrlad...@adamsinfoserv.com
PGP Key ID: 0x1160DCB3
There's not currently a clickable-URL function provided with Slideshow.
You'd have to use a combination of `clickback' and `send-url', and it
would only work when running the show (as opposed to PDF output from
printing the slides).
At Tue, 17 May 2011 12:23:36 -0300, Rodolfo Carvalho wrote:
How
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 6:06 AM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
I think we would want to implement it as a `#lang' mix-in
#lang testable racket
That sounds _great_.
_
For list-related administrative tasks:
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 10:27 AM, Russell Adams
rlad...@adamsinfoserv.com wrote:
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 10:35:26AM -0400, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
(test/gui test-suite)
That's nice, but who uses a gui?
I believe Ryan offered to add something to add this functionality to
the text
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 08:39:45AM -0600, Ryan Culpepper wrote:
Save the old check-around handler:
(define base-check-around (current-check-around))
The new handler will call the thunk (ie, run the check), and if the
check succeeds (ie, does not raise an exception), then it prints out
a
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 10:27 AM, Russell Adams
rlad...@adamsinfoserv.com wrote:
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 10:35:26AM -0400, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
(test/gui test-suite)
That's nice, but who uses a gui?
Lol we use a gui at work for the business analysts to run acceptance
tests... not in
I want to write an A-List on a file Diary.txt , this A-list contains
couples of a symbol and a string. Example : '((17/05/2011 Hello guys)
(18/05/2011 good morning)) .
But I have a problem when I read this A-List from the file with the function
(read p-in), it transforms strings to symbol ..
I apologize in advance for not actually reading through your code
beyond the point where it began using constructs that I'm not familiar
with, but I will give some advice that may or may not be helpful.
You're trying to return '(x). What you're actually returning is
(x)--an application of the
Todd
Thanks, you are definitely making me think, but I don't see what would
be wrong with what I am trying. The first thing I tried was to remove
free-vars and just call free-vars-list directly and change the case of
(var-exp (id) id)
to
(var-exp (id) (list id)) ;; in this example id == x
Todd D:
1. This code must be the worst formatted Racket code I have seen in a long
time. Please read EOPL and follow its example.
2. Next, when DrRacket tells you that a particular sub-expression in your
program raised an error, please -- pretty please -- pay attention. I removed
the
21 matches
Mail list logo
