RE: [SOGo] Question regarding SOGoDisableSharingAnyAuthUser

2023-12-20 Thread qhivert
Thanks for your feedback. I will fix the nigthly asap. Quentin From: users-requ...@sogo.nu On Behalf Of Frank Richter Sent: mercredi 20 décembre 2023 14:16 To: users@sogo.nu Subject: Re: [SOGo] Question regarding SOGoDisableSharingAnyAuthUser Am 20.12.23 um 13:50 schrieb qhivert (qhiv

Re: [SOGo] Question regarding SOGoDisableSharingAnyAuthUser

2023-12-20 Thread Frank Richter
/usersSearch?search=searchterm Thanks, Frank *From:*users-requ...@sogo.nu *On Behalf Of *Frank Richter *Sent:* mercredi 20 décembre 2023 10:34 *To:* users@sogo.nu *Subject:* [SOGo] Question regarding SOGoDisableSharingAnyAuthUser Hello, we’d like to disable the possibility for users to share

RE: [SOGo] Question regarding SOGoDisableSharingAnyAuthUser

2023-12-20 Thread qhivert
: users-requ...@sogo.nu On Behalf Of Frank Richter Sent: mercredi 20 décembre 2023 10:34 To: users@sogo.nu Subject: [SOGo] Question regarding SOGoDisableSharingAnyAuthUser Hello, we’d like to disable the possibility for users to share their mailfolders to all users. That means users should

[SOGo] Question regarding SOGoDisableSharingAnyAuthUser

2023-12-20 Thread Frank Richter
Hello, we’d like to disable the possibility for users to share their mailfolders to all users. That means users should not see the option „Any Authenticated User“ under Sharing … . I hoped that the config option SOGoDisableSharingAnyAuthUser = (Mail); would do it. And yes, the option „Any

Re: [SOGo] Question

2023-11-08 Thread "Simon Wilson"
See https://bugs.sogo.nu/view.php?id=5793 There has been no visibility on progress to resolve since it was acknowledged in June. Simon On Monday, November 06, 2023 19:04 AEST, Mladen Knežević (mladen.kneze...@mtel.ba) wrote:      Poslovno-POVJERLJIVO  Hello there,   Is there any

[SOGo] Question

2023-11-06 Thread mladen.kneze...@mtel.ba
Poslovno-POVJERLJIVO Hello there, Is there any knowledge about the possible cause of the page below? The correct page is rendered after the reload. [cid:image001.png@01DA1098.90625DD0] Best Regards, Mladen S poštovanjem, Mladen Knežević, Glavni inženjer za eksploataciju i održavanje

[SOGo] Question about GNUstep packages provided by Inverse.

2021-08-30 Thread m...@tdiehl.org
Hi, I have a couple of Centos 7 iRedMail systems still running SOGo 4 that I am going to upgrade to SOGo 5. In the SOGo instillation guide @ https://www.sogo.nu/files/docs/SOGoInstallationGuide.html I see the following: "SOGo relies on the GNUstep packages provided by Inverse and must not use

[SOGo] question on updates

2020-04-01 Thread "Tom Seeger"
Hello, we have SOGO running on a Ubuntu server as backup mail system. However the server is configured to automatically install updates (which also update sogo). But as the scripts ran automatically the post installation scripts have never been executed (since months). I have a veritable zoo

Re: [SOGo] Question regarding OpenChange package on Xenial

2019-03-07 Thread Markus Winkler
Hi Carsten, On Thu, 07 Mar 2019 at 11:23:09AM +0100, Carsten Pieper wrote: referring to https://sogo.nu/files/docs/v3/SOGoNativeOutlookConfigurationGuide.html#_installation, it says in Chapter 5 I have to install  sogo-openchange and several more. I do not find anything regarding

Re: [SOGo] Question regarding OpenChange package on Xenial

2019-03-07 Thread mj
Hi, That guide is about connecting outlook through MAPI, which requires OpenChange etc. But seems to be a path that is going nowhere, and we never used/tried it. The better way to connect outlook is over ActiveSync, and after setting that up, you will also be able to use ActiveSync on all

Re: [SOGo] Question regarding OpenChange package on Xenial

2019-03-07 Thread Carsten Pieper
Hi mj, hi all, referring to https://sogo.nu/files/docs/v3/SOGoNativeOutlookConfigurationGuide.html#_installation, it says in Chapter 5 I have to install  sogo-openchange and several more. I do not find anything regarding sogo-activesync there. So, am I right with the following thesis:

Re: [SOGo] Question regarding OpenChange package on Xenial

2019-03-07 Thread mj
Hi, But are you not looking for the package sogo-activesync? That way outlook can connect to sogo using activesync. MJ On 3/7/19 9:45 AM, Carsten Pieper (i...@carstenpieper.com) wrote: Ok, then, I need some more explanation. I was running SOGO 3 on Ubuntu 14 without having openchange

Re: [SOGo] Question regarding OpenChange package on Xenial

2019-03-07 Thread Carsten Pieper
Ok, then, I need some more explanation. I was running SOGO 3 on Ubuntu 14 without having openchange installed. SOGO was working fine, with Outlook and Exchange ActiveSync. But because of some performance troubles, I had the idea to upgrade to SOGo 4. The performance problems have not been

Re: [SOGo] Question regarding OpenChange package on Xenial

2019-03-06 Thread Ludovic Marcotte
On 2019-03-06 3:37 p.m., Markus Winkler (m...@irmawi.de) wrote: AFAIK there's no sogo-openchange package for SOGo 4 and I assume there never will be one, as to my knowledge the OpenChange project is rather dead. Right on buddy. -- Ludovic Marcotte lmarco...@inverse.ca :: +1.514.755.3630

Re: [SOGo] Question regarding OpenChange package on Xenial

2019-03-06 Thread Markus Winkler
Hi Carsten, On 05.03.19 11:41, Carsten Pieper (i...@carstenpieper.com) wrote: I'm actually migrating my SOGo installation from trusty to xenial. which version of SOGo do you currently use on Trusty - v3.x? Trying to install the necessary packages results in: E: Package 'sogo-openchange'

[SOGo] Question regarding OpenChange package on Xenial

2019-03-06 Thread Carsten Pieper
Hi all, I'm actually migrating my SOGo installation from trusty to xenial. Trying to install the necessary packages results in: E: Package 'sogo-openchange' has no installation candidate This is my relevant entry in the sources.list: deb http://www.axis.cz/linux/debian xenial sogo-v4

Re: [SOGo] Few SOGO question

2019-02-23 Thread Odhiambo Washington
On Fri, 22 Feb 2019 at 16:07, Christian Mack wrote: > Am 22.02.19 um 13:04 schrieb Odhiambo Washington (odhia...@gmail.com): > > 1. AddressBook: > > > > I have users in MySQL and the resource is configured with IsAddressBook = > > YES. > > How can I export these to Outlook or Apple Mail

Re: [SOGo] Few SOGO question

2019-02-22 Thread Christian Mack
Am 22.02.19 um 13:04 schrieb Odhiambo Washington (odhia...@gmail.com): > 1. AddressBook: > > I have users in MySQL and the resource is configured with IsAddressBook = > YES. > How can I export these to Outlook or Apple Mail transparently? > Set the following in sogo.conf in your SOGoUserSources

Re: [SOGo] I'm new to SOGo - Question about compiling

2019-01-07 Thread Gordon Messmer
On 1/5/19 9:21 PM, "hans dieter"" (hans2020die...@gmx.de) wrote: Where can I look up the versioning of SOGo builds? Is there only this Change-Log on Github, or is there an official Version-List? I'm not sure... are you looking for the release announcements? https://sogo.nu/news.html What

[SOGo] I'm new to SOGo - Question about compiling

2019-01-07 Thread "hans dieter"
Hallo,   I don't know much about SOGo ecosystem. Can someone tell me a little bit about compiling SOGo?   Where can I look up the versioning of SOGo builds? Is there only this Change-Log on Github, or is there an official Version-List? What about those production-/nightly builds? I mean,

Re: [SOGo] Question regarding SOGo v3 on Debian

2018-12-03 Thread Christian Mack
Am 30.11.18 um 18:19 schrieb Daniel Herfort (daniel.herf...@icloud.com): > Hi Christian, > > thank you for your message. Answers below. > > >> Am 30.11.2018 um 09:58 schrieb Christian Mack >> (christian.m...@uni-konstanz.de) : >> >> Am 29.11.18 um 19:26 schrieb Daniel Herfort

Re: [SOGo] Question regarding SOGo v3 on Debian

2018-11-30 Thread Daniel Herfort
Hi Christian, thank you for your message. Answers below. > Am 30.11.2018 um 09:58 schrieb Christian Mack > (christian.m...@uni-konstanz.de) : > > Am 29.11.18 um 19:26 schrieb Daniel Herfort (daniel.herf...@icloud.com): >> Hello, >> >> I am using SOGo v3.2 in my Debian 8 server. I am very

Re: [SOGo] Question regarding SOGo v3 on Debian

2018-11-30 Thread Christian Mack
Am 29.11.18 um 19:26 schrieb Daniel Herfort (daniel.herf...@icloud.com): > Hello, > > I am using SOGo v3.2 in my Debian 8 server. I am very very happy about it. > > There are only 2 things that are actually not possible: > 1) Save preferences Most of the time it is either a configuration

[SOGo] Question regarding SOGo v3 on Debian

2018-11-29 Thread Daniel Herfort
Hello, I am using SOGo v3.2 in my Debian 8 server. I am very very happy about it. There are only 2 things that are actually not possible: 1) Save preferences 2) IMAP Mail (didn’t find an adequate install guide and the vmail guide I was using for ages is not working with SOGo respectively

[SOGo] Question regarding Log level

2018-09-19 Thread Daniel Herfort
Dear list, I am new to SOGo and the list. We are trying to setup SOGo as a replacement for our Kerio Connect Server. The main reason is because Kerio is on one hand not working properly and on the other hand is not logging deep enough and for calendaring services we have no versioning. Here

Re: [SOGo] Question about Calendar ACL

2016-09-20 Thread Fulvio Parnigoni
Il 20/09/2016 12:51, "Andreas Blaha" (andr...@blaha.at) ha scritto: You can change this by choosing the person and select „Modify“ for Public, Confidential, or Private (or all) Best Andy Yes: "Modify" Simply, I have to change lenses of my glasses !! Many thanks fulvio --

AW: [SOGo] Question about Calendar ACL

2016-09-20 Thread "Andreas Blaha"
An: users@sogo.nu Betreff: [SOGo] Question about Calendar ACL Hi all, - Sogo 2.x.x - Sogo 3.x.x When a user sharing your calendar (through Web UI), he can set "This person can create objects in my calendar" and "This person can erase objects from my calendar" There is a way to all

[SOGo] Question about Calendar ACL

2016-09-20 Thread Fulvio Parnigoni
Hi all, - Sogo 2.x.x - Sogo 3.x.x When a user sharing your calendar (through Web UI), he can set "This person can create objects in my calendar" and "This person can erase objects from my calendar" There is a way to allow: "This person can edit objects in my calendar" ? Thanks fulvio --

Re: [SOGo] Question about sync sogo and thunderbird

2016-05-27 Thread Christian Mack
Hello Сергей Богданов Am 26.05.2016 um 09:58 schrieb Сергей Богданов (bogdano...@gmail.com): > I have successfully synchronized address book in the mail client. But > when I dial someone send an email in the "To:" I do not see binding > "the name - address" how it works in your personal address

[SOGo] Question about sync sogo and thunderbird

2016-05-26 Thread bogdano...@gmail.com
I have successfully synchronized address book in the mail client. But when I dial someone send an email in the "To:" I do not see binding "the name - address" how it works in your personal address book. Is it possible to bind to Sogo? Example: I enter the first few letters and see, "Andrei Smirnov

Re: [SOGo] Question on Outlook compatibility

2016-01-11 Thread Christian Mack
Hello Am 04.01.2016 um 17:31 schrieb André Schild: > Am 04.01.2016 um 16:43 schrieb itsourbusiness ict-support | marco visser: >> Dear all, >> >> Currently, I'm investigating Sogo as an Exchange alternative. In >> understand Sogo natively connects to Outlook up to 2013. > The other way round:

[SOGo] Question on Outlook compatibility

2016-01-04 Thread itsourbusiness ict-support | marco visser
Dear all, Currently, I'm investigating Sogo as an Exchange alternative. In understand Sogo natively connects to Outlook up to 2013. The current latest version of Outlook is Outlook 2016. Is 2016 supported as well? Kind regards, Marco Visser Met vriendelijke groet,

Re: [SOGo] Question on Outlook compatibility

2016-01-04 Thread André Schild
Am 04.01.2016 um 16:43 schrieb itsourbusiness ict-support | marco visser: Dear all, Currently, I'm investigating Sogo as an Exchange alternative. In understand Sogo natively connects to Outlook up to 2013. The other way round: Outlook 2013 connects to SOGo natively, since Outlook is the

Re: [SOGo] Question re: Outlook + AS (ActiveSysnc) vs. Thunderbird + Integrator

2015-03-23 Thread Martin Simovic
-- Martin Šimovič NETSON s.r.o. Mlynská 2238 934 01 Levice tel: +421 915 393 570 mail: mar...@netson.sk mailto:mar...@netson.sk On 20 Mar 2015, at 15:43, Charles Marcus cmar...@media-brokers.com wrote: On 3/20/2015 10:17 AM, Martin Simovic mar...@netson.sk wrote: On 20 Mar 2015, at

Re: [SOGo] Question re: Outlook + AS (ActiveSysnc) vs. Thunderbird + Integrator

2015-03-23 Thread Martin Simovic
On 22 Mar 2015, at 12:59, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote: On 3/20/2015 10:17 AM, Martin Simovic mar...@netson.sk wrote: AFAIK Office 365 is not using EAS for Outlook, but RoH instead. Do you know if that is that the same protocol SOGo uses for Outlook 2010 (which requires

Re: [SOGo] Question re: Outlook + AS (ActiveSysnc) vs. Thunderbird + Integrator

2015-03-23 Thread Tanstaafl
On 3/23/2015 4:29 AM, Martin Simovic mar...@netson.sk wrote: On 22 Mar 2015, at 12:59, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote: On 3/20/2015 10:17 AM, Martin Simovic mar...@netson.sk wrote: AFAIK Office 365 is not using EAS for Outlook, but RoH instead. Do you know if that is that the

Re: [SOGo] Question re: Outlook + AS (ActiveSysnc) vs. Thunderbird + Integrator

2015-03-22 Thread Tanstaafl
On 3/20/2015 10:17 AM, Martin Simovic mar...@netson.sk wrote: AFAIK Office 365 is not using EAS for Outlook, but RoH instead. Do you know if that is that the same protocol SOGo uses for Outlook 2010 (which requires Samba4)? -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists

Re: [SOGo] Question re: Outlook + AS (ActiveSysnc) vs. Thunderbird + Integrator

2015-03-22 Thread Tanstaafl
On 3/20/2015 3:00 PM, Ludovic Marcotte lmarco...@inverse.ca wrote: On 20/03/2015 14:58, Charles Marcus wrote: So this is *not* an Outlook limitation - maybe just an AS limitation? It's an Outlook limitation when using EAS - that is what I was talking about. Right, sorry, I guess I just

Re: [SOGo] Question re: Outlook + AS (ActiveSysnc) vs. Thunderbird + Integrator

2015-03-20 Thread Charles Marcus
On 3/19/2015 2:32 PM, Ludovic Marcotte lmarco...@inverse.ca wrote: Don't forget that Thunderbird + SOGo extensions gives you calendar / address books sharing with delegation. Outlook 2013 + EAS does not. Thanks Ludovic, But just to clarify - you only mean the 'delegation' part, right?

Re: [SOGo] Question re: Outlook + AS (ActiveSysnc) vs. Thunderbird + Integrator

2015-03-20 Thread Ludovic Marcotte
On 20/03/2015 06:43, Charles Marcus wrote: But just to clarify - you only mean the 'delegation' part, right? Outlook+EAS does support accessing Group/Shared Calendars and Contacts doesn't it? Only Calendars, and if you have the proper permissions to add/modify/delete calendar components for

Re: [SOGo] Question re: Outlook + AS (ActiveSysnc) vs. Thunderbird + Integrator

2015-03-20 Thread Tanstaafl
On 3/20/2015 9:45 AM, Ludovic Marcotte lmarco...@inverse.ca wrote: On 20/03/2015 06:43, Charles Marcus wrote: But just to clarify - you only mean the 'delegation' part, right? Outlook+EAS does support accessing Group/Shared Calendars and Contacts doesn't it? Only Calendars, and if you have

Re: [SOGo] Question re: Outlook + AS (ActiveSysnc) vs. Thunderbird + Integrator

2015-03-20 Thread Ludovic Marcotte
On 20/03/2015 09:53, Tanstaafl wrote: Wow... bummer. I'm curious - is this true only for SOGo's implementation? Or is this true for Office365 as well? It's an Outlook limitation, not related in any way to SOGo. -- Ludovic Marcotte lmarco...@inverse.ca :: +1.514.755.3630 ::

Re: [SOGo] Question re: Outlook + AS (ActiveSysnc) vs. Thunderbird + Integrator

2015-03-20 Thread Martin Simovic
On 20 Mar 2015, at 14:53, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote: On 3/20/2015 9:45 AM, Ludovic Marcotte lmarco...@inverse.ca wrote: On 20/03/2015 06:43, Charles Marcus wrote: But just to clarify - you only mean the 'delegation' part, right? Outlook+EAS does support accessing

Re: [SOGo] Question re: Outlook + AS (ActiveSysnc) vs. Thunderbird + Integrator

2015-03-20 Thread Tanstaafl
On 3/20/2015 9:56 AM, Ludovic Marcotte lmarco...@inverse.ca wrote: On 20/03/2015 09:53, Tanstaafl wrote: Wow... bummer. I'm curious - is this true only for SOGo's implementation? Or is this true for Office365 as well? It's an Outlook limitation, not related in any way to SOGo. Perfect, one

Re: [SOGo] Question re: Outlook + AS (ActiveSysnc) vs. Thunderbird + Integrator

2015-03-20 Thread Ludovic Marcotte
On 20/03/2015 14:58, Charles Marcus wrote: So this is*not* an Outlook limitation - maybe just an AS limitation? It's an Outlook limitation when using EAS - that is what I was talking about. -- Ludovic Marcotte lmarco...@inverse.ca :: +1.514.755.3630 :: http://inverse.ca Inverse inc. ::

Re: [SOGo] Question re: Outlook + AS (ActiveSysnc) vs. Thunderbird + Integrator

2015-03-20 Thread Charles Marcus
On 3/20/2015 9:56 AM, Ludovic Marcotte lmarco...@inverse.ca wrote: On 20/03/2015 09:53, Tanstaafl wrote: Wow... bummer. I'm curious - is this true only for SOGo's implementation? Or is this true for Office365 as well? It's an Outlook limitation, not related in any way to SOGo. Apparently this

Re: [SOGo] Question re: Outlook + AS (ActiveSysnc) vs. Thunderbird + Integrator

2015-03-11 Thread Charles Marcus
Anyone? On 3/9/2015 11:51 AM, Charles Marcus cmar...@media-brokers.com wrote: Hello, My questions has to do with potentially performance impacting issues if we switch from Thunderbird + Integrator to Outlook + AS... We have our mail server (dovecot) running on one virtual server, and SOGo

[SOGo] Question re: Outlook + AS (ActiveSysnc) vs. Thunderbird + Integrator

2015-03-09 Thread Charles Marcus
Hello, My questions has to do with potentially performance impacting issues if we switch from Thunderbird + Integrator to Outlook + AS... We have our mail server (dovecot) running on one virtual server, and SOGo running on a separate virtual server. Currently, with Thunderbird, there is no

Re: RES: [SOGo] Question regarding SOGo scalability

2014-07-24 Thread Federico Alberto Sayd
On 21/07/14 17:35, Rodrigo Mello Mattos Habib Gregori wrote: RES: [SOGo] Question regarding SOGo scalability Hello Federico, Thanks for your reply. It will be very useful to us here! Would you care to share your user base size? How many mailboxes do you have there? And for how long do you

Re: [SOGo] Question regarding SOGo scalability

2014-07-22 Thread Ludovic Marcotte
On 2014-07-21, 1:46 PM, Rodrigo Habib Gregori wrote: We wonder if SOGo can handle such a user base of this size (actually the base is going to increase: probably 12.000 mailboxes - at least - in 2 or 3 years). Quite easily. At Inverse we support tons of environments with user bases ranging from

[SOGo] Question regarding SOGo scalability

2014-07-21 Thread Rodrigo Habib Gregori
Hello, We were considering moving from zarafa community to SOGo, but we are concerned about possible scalability problems with it. Right now we have around 4000 mailboxes and zarafa can't deal with it anymore. Our current infrastructure is of 3 servers, one for Zarafa-Server (+postfix), one

Re: [SOGo] Question regarding SOGo scalability

2014-07-21 Thread Federico Alberto Sayd
On 21/07/14 14:46, Rodrigo Habib Gregori wrote: Hello, We were considering moving from zarafa community to SOGo, but we are concerned about possible scalability problems with it. Right now we have around 4000 mailboxes and zarafa can't deal with it anymore. Our current infrastructure is

RES: [SOGo] Question regarding SOGo scalability

2014-07-21 Thread Rodrigo Mello Mattos Habib Gregori
original- De:Federico Alberto Sayd fs...@uncu.edu.ar Enviado:Seg 21/07/2014 16:45 Assunto:Re: [SOGo] Question regarding SOGo scalability Para:users@sogo.nu; On 21/07/14 14:46, Rodrigo Habib Gregori wrote: Hello,      We were considering moving from zarafa community to SOGo, but we

Re: [SOGo] Question about different log line formats for certain errors

2014-07-15 Thread Christian Mack
Hello Charles Marcus Am 2014-07-08 20:08, schrieb Charles Marcus: There is one specific type of error that shows up formatted differently... Virtually all of the log lines start with Mmm DD TT:TT:TT, like this: Jul 08 13:09:10 sogod [32691]: [ERROR] 0x0x7ff375ee3c50[NGLdapAttribute]

[SOGo] Question about different log line formats for certain errors

2014-07-08 Thread Charles Marcus
Hi all, Another question... There is one specific type of error that shows up formatted differently... Virtually all of the log lines start with Mmm DD TT:TT:TT, like this: Jul 08 13:09:10 sogod [32691]: [ERROR] 0x0x7ff375ee3c50[NGLdapAttribute] could not convert value of objectGUID to

[SOGo] Question about the latest samba version/SOGo/Openchange

2014-05-15 Thread Daniel Müller
Dear all, I have aquestion concerning the latest samba version 4.1.7: The team of openchange announced that it is working with the new OpenChange 2.1 QUADRANT the best: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/openchange-internals/v7Ze5eE1oJU 2. Perfect software combination

Re: [SOGo] Question about the latest samba version/SOGo/Openchange

2014-05-15 Thread Steve Ankeny
Have you built this on Ubuntu 14.04? Inverse suggests installing Samba4 from their own repositories (as there were conflicts with Samba3) However, one of the things they're working on now is updating those repositories. I would assume it will result in a configuration much like you suggest

Re: [SOGo] Question re: SOGo URLs and DNS settings

2014-04-22 Thread André Schild
Am 21.04.2014 23:02, schrieb Charles Marcus: And even better would be, rather than having to manually customize Integrator, just specify the settings in SOGo.conf... I'm assuming there is a reason this isn't possible (yet)? Where should thunderbird find the server? André -- users@sogo.nu

Re: [SOGo] Question re: SOGo URLs and DNS settings

2014-04-22 Thread André Schild
Am 22.04.2014 08:47, schrieb André Schild: Am 21.04.2014 23:02, schrieb Charles Marcus: And even better would be, rather than having to manually customize Integrator, just specify the settings in SOGo.conf... I'm assuming there is a reason this isn't possible (yet)? Where should

Re: [SOGo] Question re: SOGo URLs and DNS settings

2014-04-22 Thread Szládovics Péter
2014-04-22 13:49 keltezéssel, André Schild írta: Am 22.04.2014 08:47, schrieb André Schild: Am 21.04.2014 23:02, schrieb Charles Marcus: And even better would be, rather than having to manually customize Integrator, just specify the settings in SOGo.conf... I'm assuming there is a reason

Re: [SOGo] Question re: SOGo URLs and DNS settings

2014-04-22 Thread Tanstaafl
On 4/22/2014 2:47 AM, André Schild an...@schild.ws wrote: Am 21.04.2014 23:02, schrieb Charles Marcus: And even better would be, rather than having to manually customize Integrator, just specify the settings in SOGo.conf... I'm assuming there is a reason this isn't possible (yet)? Where

Re: [SOGo] Question re: SOGo URLs and DNS settings

2014-04-22 Thread André Schild
Am 22.04.2014 13:58, schrieb Szládovics Péter: 2014-04-22 13:49 keltezéssel, André Schild írta: Am 22.04.2014 08:47, schrieb André Schild: Am 21.04.2014 23:02, schrieb Charles Marcus: And even better would be, rather than having to manually customize Integrator, just specify the settings in

Re: [SOGo] Question re: SOGo URLs and DNS settings

2014-04-22 Thread Charles Marcus
On 4/22/2014 9:39 AM, André Schild an...@schild.ws wrote: Am 22.04.2014 13:58, schrieb Szládovics Péter: 2014-04-22 13:49 keltezéssel, André Schild írta: Am 22.04.2014 08:47, schrieb André Schild: Am 21.04.2014 23:02, schrieb Charles Marcus: And even better would be, rather than having to

Re: [SOGo] Question re: SOGo URLs and DNS settings

2014-04-21 Thread Charles Marcus
And even better would be, rather than having to manually customize Integrator, just specify the settings in SOGo.conf... I'm assuming there is a reason this isn't possible (yet)? On 4/17/2014 8:24 AM, Charles Marcus cmar...@media-brokers.com wrote: Thanks mourik, I'll wait until I hear

Re: [SOGo] Question re: SOGo URLs and DNS settings

2014-04-17 Thread mourik jan heupink
Hi Charles, As far as I know, these things cannot be changed. However, just wodering, perhaps it could be an idea to load the entire url https://webmail.example.com/SOGo/ in a frame on https://webmail.example.com? We are using a redirect on https://webmail.example.com, to redirect to /SOGo

Re: [SOGo] Question re: SOGo URLs and DNS settings

2014-04-17 Thread Charles Marcus
Thanks mourik, I'll wait until I hear from one of the devs (Ludo?) before doing so to see if this is even remotely feasible (I guess i t depends on how SOGo is coded). Simplified URLS would be really great though... Hmmm... I'd even go one further... Being able to customize/specify these

[SOGo] Question re: SOGo URLs and DNS settings

2014-04-16 Thread Charles Marcus
Hello, Is it possible to adjust the web browser for SOGo such that: For our webmail access, instead of: https://webmail.example.com/SOGo/ It can just be: https://webmail.example.com Also, same question for the Card/CalDAV URLS... Instead of: https://sogo.example.com/SOGo/dav/username I'd

[SOGo] Question re Public Calendar ....

2013-02-28 Thread steve_a
We have five individual users each with an individual calendar. One individual calendar is shared with all authenticated users, and each user is subscribed. We are using that as the staff calendar, and all users have read permissions while two have read/write How can I make the shared calendar

Re: [SOGo] Question re Public Calendar ....

2013-02-28 Thread Ronald J. Yacketta
Nothing special :) Just enable Public access in the config (see the documentation) and then set the proper ACL's on the calendar. We do the above with which you can see a dev copy here : http://qantas.potsdam.edu/phpicalendar/month.php?cal=a9e22d594c67a2907d2e47af928ed290 On Thursday, 28

Re: [SOGo] Question re Public Calendar ....

2013-02-28 Thread Steve Ankeny
Thanks! It's been awhile since I've modified '.GNUstepDefaults' Pg. 14, 18, 'SOGo Installation Guide_2.03' su - sogo defaults write sogod SOGoEnablePublicAccess YES That's a good looking calendar! Now, I'll investigate getting mine into the application. On 02/28/2013 05:08 PM, Ronald J.

Re: [SOGo] Question SOGo/Thunderbird

2012-07-30 Thread Marc Patermann
Nicolas, Nicolas Cauchie schrieb (28.07.2012 00:59 Uhr): If I understood the documentation, SOGo Integrator/Connector isn't efficient if SOGo server and Mail server are differents ? Where do you read that? Then I install SOGo Integrator (customized), Connector and Mozilla Lightning. Never

Re: [SOGo] Question SOGo/Thunderbird

2012-07-28 Thread Paul van der Vlis
Op 28-07-12 00:59, Nicolas Cauchie schreef: Hello there ! I have a question, maybe a dumb question... If I understood the documentation, SOGo Integrator/Connector isn't efficient if SOGo server and Mail server are differents ? My configuration is : - A mail server (Dovecot/Postfix) -

Re: [SOGo] Question SOGo/Thunderbird

2012-07-28 Thread Bruno Lingner (Hugo)
In our case, I unpack the sogo integrator and edit the file defaults/preferences/site.js and set the last line like this: pref(sogo-integrator.autocomplete.server.urlid, ldap); that's because in the sogo config file .GNUstepDefaults we have the ldap address book configured like this:

[SOGo] Question SOGo/Thunderbird

2012-07-27 Thread Nicolas Cauchie
Hello there ! I have a question, maybe a dumb question... If I understood the documentation, SOGo Integrator/Connector isn't efficient if SOGo server and Mail server are differents ? My configuration is : - A mail server (Dovecot/Postfix) - A SOGo server (lastest day release) - An AD server

Re: [SOGo] Question SOGo/Thunderbird

2012-07-27 Thread Nicolas Cauchie
Le 28/07/2012 00:59, Nicolas Cauchie a écrit : Hello there ! I have a question, maybe a dumb question... If I understood the documentation, SOGo Integrator/Connector isn't efficient if SOGo server and Mail server are differents ? My configuration is : - A mail server (Dovecot/Postfix) - A

[SOGo] Question about MailFieldNames for LDAP

2012-03-27 Thread Darko Hojnik
Hi there I want tell SOGo the fields for mailadresses and alternative mailadresses. In the Docomentation I've read that I should choose MailFieldNames for that. Could someone describe me the use of the SOGoUserSources MailFieldNames and give me an example? Without MailFieldNames defaults write

Re: [SOGo] Question about provisioning users in SOGo

2012-01-18 Thread Fabián Rodríguez
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2012-01-18 00:28, Georg Bretschneider wrote: Hi Fabian, please take a look into the SOGo documentation. There is an example ldif file shown for creating an ordinary user. With the informations provided there you should be able to create a

Re: [SOGo] Question about provisioning users in SOGo

2012-01-18 Thread Georg Bretschneider
Hi Fabian, you are right, both ldifs are more or less the same. I forgot about that. Nevertheless, I pointed you to the documentation so you can reassure yourself that everything you did was correct. The fact you're using ZEG...well, I did not parse this piece. It was too early in the morning

Re: [SOGo] Question about provisioning users in SOGo [SOLVED using LDAP+CLI]

2012-01-18 Thread Fabian Rodriguez
On 12-01-17 04:52 PM, Fabian Rodriguez wrote: Hi, [...] The documentation [...] mentions using an LDIF file. I used the LDAP web admin to clone an existing user [at the top hierarchy, should have looked into people] yet it won't authenticate. I managed to create a new valid user by using

[SOGo] Question about provisioning users in SOGo

2012-01-17 Thread Fabian Rodriguez
Hi, It looks like users provisioning is done in Webwin, directly editing LDAP (seen on the ZEG web interface): You can browse, modify and create accounts using Webmin: 1. Select *LDAP Server* from the Servers menu 2. Select *Browser Database* The documentation also mentions using an LDIF

Re: [SOGo] Question about provisioning users in SOGo

2012-01-17 Thread Ludovic Marcotte
On 17/01/12 16:52, Fabian Rodriguez wrote: It looks like users provisioning is done in Webwin, directly editing LDAP (seen on the ZEG web interface): You can browse, modify and create accounts using Webmin: 1. Select *LDAP Server* from the Servers menu 2. Select *Browser Database* The

Re: [SOGo] Question about provisioning users in SOGo

2012-01-17 Thread Fabian Rodriguez
On 12-01-17 05:42 PM, Ludovic Marcotte wrote: On 17/01/12 16:52, Fabian Rodriguez wrote: It looks like users provisioning is done in Webwin, directly editing LDAP (seen on the ZEG web interface): You can browse, modify and create accounts using Webmin: 1. Select *LDAP Server* from the

Re: [SOGo] Question about provisioning users in SOGo

2012-01-17 Thread Georg Bretschneider
Hi Fabian, please take a look into the SOGo documentation. There is an example ldif file shown for creating an ordinary user. With the informations provided there you should be able to create a user using Webmin, too. But it looks like you are having a general problem here. Take a look into

[SOGo] question about alarms

2011-06-01 Thread Fabrice Peraud
Hi, I am writing a script to create events in a shared calendar and invite 1 people for each event. Everything works well under SOGo except the alarms : each event contains 3 alarms with type DISPLAY and 3 with type EMAIL. Once the first alarm is launched, next alarms seem disabled.

Re: [SOGo] Question about Sympa

2011-02-24 Thread Thomas OLIVIER
Hi, Yes, look at commands list: https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists/help/mail_commands |SET /list/ NOMAIL|: suspend receipt of the list's messages regards. Thomas. You can try Le 23/02/2011 20:21, Paul van der Vlis a écrit : Hello, I read and post to this mailinglist through news.gmane.org. I

Re: [SOGo] Question about Sympa

2011-02-24 Thread Paul van der Vlis
Op 24-02-11 11:45, Thomas OLIVIER schreef: Hi, Yes, look at commands list: https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists/help/mail_commands |SET /list/ NOMAIL|: suspend receipt of the list's messages Thanks, it works. With regards, Paul van der Vlis -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists

Re: [SOGo] Question Regarding Attendees

2011-01-06 Thread Stuart Sheldon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Ok, Here is a summary of what we are seeing... Should I file a bug report? When viewing a calendar event created by the current user in Thunderbird, or through the web interface, after clicking on the 'Attendees' link via the Inverse Lightning

Re: [SOGo] Question Regarding Attendees

2011-01-06 Thread Stuart Sheldon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Thanks Ludovic, Added to bug tracking. Stu On 01/06/2011 11:23 AM, Ludovic Marcotte wrote: On 11-01-06 1:25 PM, Stuart Sheldon wrote: Ok, Here is a summary of what we are seeing... Should I file a bug report? [snip] Yes, please.

Re: [SOGo] Question Regarding Attendees

2011-01-04 Thread Stuart Sheldon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Some More Info... This issue appears to only effect Linux Debian and Ubuntu. I have tested and verified that the status indicator icons appear properly in the Windows version. My testing is limited to 64bit Debian, and 32bit Ubuntu, as all our

Re: [SOGo] Question Regarding Attendees

2010-12-21 Thread Stuart Sheldon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi Ludovic, Yes, if I create a calendar item on the web, invite a single attendee on the web, then have the attendee accept the item on the web. The web interface shows a green checkbox next to his his name on the pulldown, but the Thunderbird

[SOGo] question about public calendars and default permissions

2010-12-16 Thread Erik Myllymaki
Hello, We set SOGoCalendarDefaultRoles to PublicDAndTViewer so that new users always have their Free/Busy info available by default on their Personal Calendar. We found this a better option then setting the default permissions tighter but then telling everyone to adjust their personal

Re: [SOGo] Question Regarding Attendees

2010-12-15 Thread Stuart Sheldon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Sorry for the delay getting back to this... No, there are no errors in the error console... I'm wondering if the is a 'lack of functionality knowledge' problem on my part. I might have the wrong expectation of how this should work. To clarify, In

Re: [SOGo] Question Regarding Attendees

2010-12-15 Thread Ludovic Marcotte
On 10-12-15 11:42 AM, Stuart Sheldon wrote: Now, I starting to think that this is by design and not a bug or problem with the software. Is this the case? It's definitively a problem. I've seen that in the past but the ics was actually corrupted. It is happening even with a new event (created

Re: [SOGo] Question Regarding Attendees

2010-12-14 Thread Mark Adams
It works OK for me. Are you using the sogo-integrator and sogo-connector? caldav scheduling should also be set to true in your plugin config I believe. Regards, Mark On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 10:29:26PM -0800, Stuart Sheldon wrote: Hey Mark, I can see the status of the attendees in the web

Re: [SOGo] Question Regarding Attendees

2010-12-14 Thread Stuart Sheldon
Not sure where to turn on caldav scheduling... Here is what is installed: Thunderbird 3.1.6 Lightning 1.0b2.104i Inverse connector 3.104 Inverse Integrator 3.104 From web interface I see the Green check mark or yellow ball next to attendee links in pull down. These are missing with lightning

Re: [SOGo] Question Regarding Attendees

2010-12-14 Thread Ludovic Marcotte
On 10-12-14 9:12 AM, Stuart Sheldon wrote: Not sure where to turn on caldav scheduling... Here is what is installed: Thunderbird 3.1.6 Lightning 1.0b2.104i Inverse connector 3.104 Inverse Integrator 3.104 From web interface I see the Green check mark or yellow ball next to attendee links in

Re: [SOGo] Question Regarding Attendees

2010-12-14 Thread Stuart Sheldon
Hi Ludovic, Here it is... All we did was add our servers FQDN... Everything else works great... I'm wondering if the icons are missing from the package? Or maybe a .js setting is missing? Those would be issues that would show up on a fresh install but not an upgrade... Stu ?xml version=1.0?

Re: [SOGo] Question Regarding Attendees

2010-12-14 Thread Ludovic Marcotte
On 10-12-14 9:27 AM, Stuart Sheldon wrote: Hi Ludovic, Here it is... All we did was add our servers FQDN... Looks good. Everything else works great... I'm wondering if the icons are missing from the package? Or maybe a .js setting is missing? Those would be issues that would show up on a

[SOGo] Question Regarding Attendees

2010-12-13 Thread Stuart Sheldon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi all, Is there any way to look and see who has not responded to a meeting invitation other then selecting 'Compose email to undecided attendees'? Stu - -- Open up the window Let some air into this room I think I'm almost chokin' From the smell

Re: [SOGo] Question Regarding Attendees

2010-12-13 Thread Stuart Sheldon
Hey Mark, I can see the status of the attendees in the web based version when I select the attendee's link, but in Lightning, the 'status icon' is missing next to the attendee's names. Is this a bug? Stu On 12/13/2010 03:57 PM, Mark Adams wrote: you can click on the invite attendees link

  1   2   >