Re: per-user bayes

will idle below the learning thresholds for quite a long time. Can you give an idea of the size calculation? I'm wanting to do this, but I need to figure out how much space I need to allocate per user! The SA docs estimate 5-10M per user for file-based per-user Bayes with the default token expiry

Re: per-user bayes

hg user skrev den 2020-12-09 08:57: I believe that a SA plugin (like bayes) is able to know the envelope MAIL FROM and RCPT TO values... is it correct? If it is possible we "just" have to modify the bayes plugin provide this patch first and ask later :=) bayes does not fokus on specifik

Re: per-user bayes

On 2020-12-09 9:48 am, deano-spamassas...@areyes.com wrote: > On 2020-12-09 4:41 am, @lbutlr wrote: > > On 08 Dec 2020, at 13:54, micah anderson wrote: > Kris Deugau writes: There will only be one database and > set of tables, but one of the fields in each table is the user identifier.

Re: per-user bayes

On 2020-12-09 4:41 am, @lbutlr wrote: > On 08 Dec 2020, at 13:54, micah anderson wrote: > >> Kris Deugau writes: > There will only be one database and set of tables, but one of the fields in > each table is the user identifier. Fair warning - if you go full per-user on > a large system,

Re: per-user bayes

On 08 Dec 2020, at 13:54, micah anderson wrote: > Kris Deugau writes: >> There will only be one database and set of tables, but one of the fields >> in each table is the user identifier. Fair warning - if you go full >> per-user on a large system, this will MASSIVELY balloon the size of your

Re: per-user bayes

I believe that a SA plugin (like bayes) is able to know the envelope MAIL FROM and RCPT TO values... is it correct? If it is possible we "just" have to modify the bayes plugin On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 10:13 PM Benny Pedersen wrote: > micah anderson skrev den 2020-12-08 21:54: > > Kris Deugau

Re: per-user bayes

micah anderson skrev den 2020-12-08 21:54: Kris Deugau writes: There will only be one database and set of tables, but one of the fields in each table is the user identifier. Fair warning - if you go full per-user on a large system, this will MASSIVELY balloon the size of your Bayes

Re: per-user bayes

Kris Deugau writes: > There will only be one database and set of tables, but one of the fields > in each table is the user identifier. Fair warning - if you go full > per-user on a large system, this will MASSIVELY balloon the size of your > Bayes database, and most users will idle below the

Re: per-user bayes

Benoit Panizzon wrote: Hi This may help I sort of have the same issue. Unfortunately that does not help, it merely explains how to store bayes data in a database. But there is still only one 'global'

Re: per-user bayes

On 08 Dec 2020, at 08:36, Benoit Panizzon wrote: > Adding the list back to CC as I believe this is an interesting topic > many have pondered over. Forgot to fix the reply to on this list for some reason. Fixed now. > Yes, I see that is states 'per user' but I still don't see, how that > 'bayes

Re: per-user bayes

Hi Adding the list back to CC as I believe this is an interesting topic many have pondered over. Yes, I see that is states 'per user' but I still don't see, how that 'bayes user' is being set on a per recipient base. On the email platform there is ONE config file for spamassassin. So if I set

Re: per-user bayes

Hi > This may help > > I sort of have the same issue. Unfortunately that does not help, it merely explains how to store bayes data in a database. But there is still only one 'global' database on your mail

Re: per-user bayes

On 07 Dec 2020, at 13:56, micah anderson wrote: > A per-user setup would let each user do their own thing, but I don't see > how I can do that because our system doesn't have individual system > users and I don't see that there are options in the bayes sql > configuration or per-user tables

per-user bayes

Hi all, I've got a site-wide bayes mysql setup. It keeps getting poisoned quickly, because the user patterns are far too divergent from each other. One person's spam is another person's ham, nobody is happy. A per-user setup would let each user do their own thing, but I don't see how I can do

SQL Preferences and file-based per-user bayes

Is there any way to use both an SQL configuration for virtual user preferences, but at the same time use file-based bayes databases for virtual users? The spamd man page for the -virtual-config-dir option states: Note that this requires that -x is used, and cannot be

Global and per-user bayes in sql

Hello Is it posible to use global per-user bayes in sql? The intented usage should be the following mail---spamassassin---generic_rules---per-user-rules-sql---global_bayes_sql---per_user_bayes Is this setup possible? I have been playing with bayes_sql_override_username, but If I enable

Re: Global and per-user bayes in sql

More data about my enviroment Spamassassin: 3.3.2 OS: CentOS 5 x86 How is SA invoqued: qmail-scanner 2.10 Any idea? Regards Maria - Original Message - From: Maria Arrea Sent: 02/02/12 10:04 AM To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Global and per-user bayes in sql Hello

Re: Per-user bayes filter DBs not accessible to mail delivered to aliases?

I have a mailserver running postfix and spamassassin. I have a user 'user1' and an alias 'alias1', like this in /etc/aliases: Two obvious things to check: 1) did you run 'newaliases' to rebuild the aliases database? Positive. The mail is delivered to the right place, it just doesn't get the

Re: Per-user bayes filter DBs not accessible to mail delivered to aliases?

On Wed, 16 Mar 2011 12:24:18 -0500 David King dk...@ketralnis.com wrote: I have a mailserver running postfix and spamassassin. I have a user 'user1' and an alias 'alias1', like this in /etc/aliases: Two obvious things to check: 1) did you run 'newaliases' to rebuild the aliases database?

Re: Per-user bayes filter DBs not accessible to mail delivered to aliases?

I have a mailserver running postfix and spamassassin. I have a user 'user1' and an alias 'alias1', like this in /etc/aliases: Two obvious things to check: 1) did you run 'newaliases' to rebuild the aliases database? Positive. The mail is delivered to the right place, it just doesn't get the

Re: Per-user bayes filter DBs not accessible to mail delivered to aliases?

On Tue, 2011-03-15 at 00:39 -0500, David King wrote: I have a mailserver running postfix and spamassassin. I have a user 'user1' and an alias 'alias1', like this in /etc/aliases: Two obvious things to check: 1) did you run 'newaliases' to rebuild the aliases database? 2) As there is more

Per-user bayes filter DBs not accessible to mail delivered to aliases?

to find the user 'alias1' (when it should be looking for the user 'user1'). This makes the suid fail which makes the per-user bayes database for 'user1' not useable when receiving mail sent to 'alias1'. The log lines look like: Mar 14 21:39:23 mydomain spamd[2552]: spamd: connection from

Re: per user bayes db: auto_expiry problem --- SOLVED

Hi Folks, it's been a while I asked here how to solve bayes timeout and spamd child timeout problems. Well, at least for our environment I have found a solution that seems to work. Also, I have a theory about the reason for this bayes timeout and spamd child timeout problems and I'd like to know

Re: per user bayes db: auto_expiry problem, spamd child timeout, very long scantimes

On Tue, 27 Feb 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Some emails have a scantime of more than 900 seconds. I do not see a relation to a huge load on the SpamAssassin Servers (I have 2 of them). The timeout problems happen when there is small load (10 out of 20 spamds marked Busy) as well as when

per user bayes db: auto_expiry problem, spamd child timeout, very long scantimes

Hi all I run a site for more than 2000 mailboxes with Postfix, SA 3.1.8 and procmail. Every user has his own bayes db. Allow_user_rules is deactivated. I have a number of problems: A number of emails passes spamd unfiltered due to spamd child timeout. Looking at the scantime it often is far

Re: per user bayes db: auto_expiry problem, spamd child timeout, very long scantimes

On Tue, 27 Feb 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Some emails have a scantime of more than 900 seconds. I do not see a relation to a huge load on the SpamAssassin Servers (I have 2 of them). The timeout problems happen when there is small load (10 out of 20 spamds marked Busy) as well as when

Re: switching from global bayes to per-user bayes

No comments whatsoever? signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

R: switching from global bayes to per-user bayes

I am looking into switching from a global bayes/awl/setting environment to a per-user environment with MySQL as a backend. puts on asbestos suit Would anyone care to offer an opinion as to whether and/or to what degree this might make in overall effectiveness? Anyone back up that opinion

switching from global bayes to per-user bayes

I am looking into switching from a global bayes/awl/setting environment to a per-user environment with MySQL as a backend. puts on asbestos suit Would anyone care to offer an opinion as to whether and/or to what degree this might make in overall effectiveness? Anyone back up that opinion with

Per-user bayes filter on site-wide spamassassin setup

I have a site wide spamassassin running on a Debian unstable box (because I like my server bloody ;). I am using postfix and amavisd-new with clamav and spamassassin filtering through amavisd-new. This is basically running smoothly, and spamassassin is doing a decent job. However bayes

Re: Per-user bayes filter on site-wide spamassassin setup

Anders Ellenshøj Andersen wrote: How can I make spamassassin read the bayes database for the user that is recieving the mail. Is this even a good idea? Should I use a central database instead? With amavis you only have the option of using a single site wide bayes database. -- Scott Russell

Per-User - Bayes Learning

Hello All, I have e-mail accounts that have been sending Spam to a specific e-mail address as an attachment for some time now. Before they were manually gone through as I didn't have anything specific set up on a per-account basis. Now that I have SA on our Win2K server storing

Re: Per-User - Bayes Learning

At 10:00 PM 1/1/2006, Duane Hill wrote: Hello All, I have e-mail accounts that have been sending Spam to a specific e-mail address as an attachment for some time now. Before they were manually gone through as I didn't have anything specific set up on a per-account basis. Now that