Re: sa-learn absurdly slow on re-iterating over mailboxes (TxRep involved)

2020-01-24 Thread Nix
On 14 Jan 2020, Henrik K. said: > On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 12:05:57PM +, Nix wrote: >> >> I've come to the conclusion that TxRep is essentially unmaintained and >> basically doesn't work unless you use SQL storage, and have migrated >> back to the AWL, which still works fine. I hope I'm

Re: sa-learn absurdly slow on re-iterating over mailboxes (TxRep involved)

2020-01-24 Thread Nix
On 14 Jan 2020, Dean Carpenter spake thusly: > On 2020-01-14 7:05 am, Nix wrote: >> On 8 Jan 2020, Benjamin Block told this: >> >> ... looks like it to me. It's at least spotting the lock and breaking >> it, but it's still taking a second and a half to do it, and it happens >> for each message.

Re: sa-learn absurdly slow on re-iterating over mailboxes (TxRep involved)

2020-01-17 Thread RW
On Tue, 14 Jan 2020 12:05:57 + Nix wrote: > I've come to the conclusion that TxRep is essentially unmaintained and > basically doesn't work unless you use SQL storage, and have migrated > back to the AWL, which still works fine. I hope I'm wrong. I think people should think about whether

Re: sa-learn absurdly slow on re-iterating over mailboxes (TxRep involved)

2020-01-17 Thread Benjamin Block
On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 12:05:57PM +, Nix wrote: > On 8 Jan 2020, Benjamin Block told this: > > > Now, if I run sa-learn again on the same folder (the manual says > > "SpamAssassin remembers which mail messages it has learnt already, > > and will not re-learn those messages again, unless you

Re: sa-learn absurdly slow on re-iterating over mailboxes (TxRep involved)

2020-01-14 Thread Dean Carpenter
On 2020-01-14 7:05 am, Nix wrote: On 8 Jan 2020, Benjamin Block told this: ... looks like it to me. It's at least spotting the lock and breaking it, but it's still taking a second and a half to do it, and it happens for each message. That's better than the 90s it used to take, but still bad.

Re: sa-learn absurdly slow on re-iterating over mailboxes (TxRep involved)

2020-01-14 Thread Henrik K
On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 12:05:57PM +, Nix wrote: > > I've come to the conclusion that TxRep is essentially unmaintained and > basically doesn't work unless you use SQL storage, and have migrated > back to the AWL, which still works fine. I hope I'm wrong. There's only so much a few inactive

Re: sa-learn absurdly slow on re-iterating over mailboxes (TxRep involved)

2020-01-14 Thread Nix
On 8 Jan 2020, Benjamin Block told this: > Now, if I run sa-learn again on the same folder (the manual says > "SpamAssassin remembers which mail messages it has learnt already, > and will not re-learn those messages again, unless you use the --forget > option.", so I think this is OK to do), it

sa-learn absurdly slow on re-iterating over mailboxes (TxRep involved)

2020-01-08 Thread Benjamin Block
Hello, I setup spamassassin the other week on my inbox mail-server, and so far its been running good, now I wanted to try to train my bayes database with some mails I have stored (200+ of each spam and ham, which should be enough according to documentation). Here is the version I am using: