Hi,
May be, a solution for your case would be to use ivy ant tasks to manage/list
the dependencies of wicket. I don't use Ivy, but it could use maven's
repositories and pom.xml.
I'm not sur it help you, because I don't use it, like lot of, I like maven 2 (dependencies and conventions), and
Hi,
My scenario is the following, I've got a page that allows a user to send an
sms to themselves every 20 seconds to a maximum of two times just incase
something in the network stopped the sms from getting to them in the first
place.
I have an ajax timer that enables the resend button after the
I am curious, what is your use case for chaining behaviors?
I think that if you have two things that you want to chain, then chain them
in the same handler, or use decorator to add the client-side code.
Alex
paolo di tommaso wrote:
Carlos,
Can you provide an example of your custom
You should try this with latest trunk. This should be fixed already,
but after beta 3.
-Matej
On 9/6/07, Alex Objelean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When using wicket-1.3.0-beta3, still have the same problem.
Here is again the stacktrace:
org.apache.wicket.WicketRuntimeException: component
Right now, I do not know if this kind of issue can be fixed on the wicket
side. But what I do know for sure, is that this have to do with making
multiple ajax request which are scheduled by the Wicket.Channel and are
executed synchronously and which affects the DOM when the response is
arrived,
Sure i wanna do real programming in javascript.
My issue was, the back end devs here can tap away writing wicket but it wont
cover 100% of the interactions that are needed on the front end. So I hoped
that if wicked used a preferred JS framework for some of its widgets I could
save alot of
not the case that David has..
If i write a test case for the ValueMap and i get and put username in it
everything works.
Ofcourse if i set the debug logging level then i get a debug warning because
we do log there when
we couldn't find a get or a is property method..
johan
On 9/6/07, Igor
On Thursday, September 6, 2007, 9:12:32 AM, wicket [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My scenario is the following, I've got a page that allows a user to send an
sms to themselves every 20 seconds to a maximum of two times just incase
something in the network stopped the sms from getting to them in the
Guys,
While I'm ruffling the wicket feathers I thought I'd ask about about another
issue that's been bothering me with wicket.
From what I can see you either have the option of using AJAX or not. This is
all well and good but they seem like very forked approaches. So what I'm
trying to say is
Hello Gwyn,
So after I put wicket-velocity jar in my build path, I`m getting following
errors. (I`m using nothing from it and the prove is when I remove it it deploys
OK.)
---6.9.2007 11:37:21 org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext filterStart
SEVERE: Exception starting filter
I thought we were trimming textfield strings, but now i see it's no
longer the case. Is it a regression or a feature?
Also the missing message doesn't make much sense, can you please
report a JIRA issue and attach a quick start project?
-Matej
On 9/6/07, Alex Objelean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday, September 6, 2007, 9:52:46 AM, Robo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So after I put wicket-velocity jar in my build path, I`m getting
following errors. (I`m using nothing from it and the prove is
when I remove it it deploys OK.)
...
So please explain me why Tomcat is complaining at
Thank you very much Matej! To be honest, I didn't expected to have such a
prompt response. :)
Btw, when beta-4 is out?
Alex.
Matej Knopp-2 wrote:
Yes, I know what's causing it. And as I said, this should be already
taken care of. I've added a special precondition evaluated right
before
Dunno, there's still work to do, but there are snapshot somewhere
available, you can grab those if you don't want to build wicket.
-Matej
On 9/6/07, Alex Objelean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thank you very much Matej! To be honest, I didn't expected to have such a
prompt response. :)
Btw, when
http://www.wicketstuff.org/maven/repository/org/apache/wicket/
On 9/6/07, Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dunno, there's still work to do, but there are snapshot somewhere
available, you can grab those if you don't want to build wicket.
-Matej
On 9/6/07, Alex Objelean [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Done, see here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-934 WICKET-934
Matej Knopp-2 wrote:
I thought we were trimming textfield strings, but now i see it's no
longer the case. Is it a regression or a feature?
Also the missing message doesn't make much sense, can you please
Here is an article on the subject:
http://day-to-day-stuff.blogspot.com/2007/01/backward-compatible-ajax-development.html
Regards,
Erik.
Taking that approach would mean pages that were ajax would
work if the the user disabled javascript or not. Not to mention
a whole wealth of other
I've grabbed the latest SNAPSHOT from the repository and have noticed that
AbstractRepeater#onBeforeRender is final. I wonder what is the reason for
this? (I need to do something in it's subclass)
/**
* @see org.apache.wicket.Component#onBeforeRender()
*/
Thanks :)
Erik van Oosten wrote:
Here is an article on the subject:
http://day-to-day-stuff.blogspot.com/2007/01/backward-compatible-ajax-development.html
Regards,
Erik.
Taking that approach would mean pages that were ajax would
work if the the user disabled javascript or
I would prefer to use onBeforeRender, instead of onPopulate, since it is the
I do in other components. Why would I use different life-cycle methods,
depending on the component I'm using?
Alex
Matej Knopp-2 wrote:
IMHO that's a bit wrong.
You can subclass onPopulate instead, but i think we
Thank you again, Matej! :)
Will it be fixed, or should I create a task in JIRA?
Alex
Matej Knopp-2 wrote:
Some time ago onBeforeRender was called always, even if the component
was not visible. This had caused problems with repeaters, therefore
this restriction - to make sure onPopulate
Please do, so that we don't forget.
-Matej
On 9/6/07, Alex Objelean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thank you again, Matej! :)
Will it be fixed, or should I create a task in JIRA?
Alex
Matej Knopp-2 wrote:
Some time ago onBeforeRender was called always, even if the component
was not
Hi
Im trying to create a test that renders a page and then compares it to
the expected result. Currently I keep getting diff errors although I
just copied the contents of the html file from the tester.dumpPage() and
placed it in the expected result file. I guess its just a matter of
spaces
I should also mentioned that Im testing by doing this:
WicketTester.assertResultPage(this.getClass(), filename);
Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael wrote:
Hi
Im trying to create a test that renders a page and then compares it to
the expected result. Currently I keep getting diff errors
Done. Here is the issue link:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-935 WICKET-935
Matej Knopp-2 wrote:
Please do, so that we don't forget.
-Matej
On 9/6/07, Alex Objelean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thank you again, Matej! :)
Will it be fixed, or should I create a task in
With the latest SNAPSHOT, the application throws Exception almost always
:(... I thing, it has not been tested too much. Here is the stacktrace:
.apache.wicket.WicketRuntimeException: component
body:panel:actionListContainer:actionList:form:actionList:65 not found on
page
Hi *,
i use wicket-1.2.6. I try to change the background-color of an gridtable item.
But i dont get it to work. Is there a howto or doc for it? javadoc is not that
detailed.
My goal is to display a table with link as cell-content. If i click on the link
the cell should be marked selected by
On 9/5/07, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
can you make an jira issue for this?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-936
Any ideas on encapsulating the session as a propertymodel for components in 1.2?
Gabor
new PropertyModel(Page.this, session.foo.sushi.bar);
?
On 9/6/07, Gabor Szokoli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/5/07, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
can you make an jira issue for this?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-936
Any ideas on encapsulating the session as a
that's weird. could be a bug in precodition check. Can you please
create a jira entry and add a quickstart project? This might be a
corner case, I'd like to fix this asap.
-Matej
On 9/6/07, Alex Objelean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With the latest SNAPSHOT, the application throws Exception almost
It's quite hard to create a quickstart project, since the project I'm working
on is very large. But if you think that it is enough to create a JIRA task
with the stacktrace and short description, than I'll do it.
Alex
Matej Knopp-2 wrote:
that's weird. could be a bug in precodition check.
Unfortunately just a jira issue will not od that. Can't you try to
isolate the problem?
-Matej
On 9/6/07, Alex Objelean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's quite hard to create a quickstart project, since the project I'm working
on is very large. But if you think that it is enough to create a JIRA
Also, can you post code of the serverside event handler?
-Matej
On 9/6/07, Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unfortunately just a jira issue will not od that. Can't you try to
isolate the problem?
-Matej
On 9/6/07, Alex Objelean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's quite hard to create a
Fidling around with the spaces, I've now boiled it down to this error only:
ERROR - DiffUtil - ===
It's not that descriptive though:( Cant really see whats wrong..
regards Nino
Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael wrote:
I should also mentioned that Im
looking at the sourcefile I saw this option:
-Dwicket.replace.expected.results=true
could this be what I was looking for to genereate the expected results?
I think so:)
regards Nino
Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael wrote:
Fidling around with the spaces, I've now boiled it down to this
I will do that as soon as I can (hope tomorrow. Anyway, the quickstart is
easy to create). Till then, a short description:
I use a RefreshingView table with actions (some business entity). Each row
has attached an AjaxEventBehavior to onclick event. When a row is clicked,
another component
THE HEADER IS NOT WORKING
DIV id=header
UL
LIA href=# wicket:id=homeLinkHome/A/LI
LI id=current wicket:id=trendArchiveA href=#Trend
Archive/A/LI
LIA href=# wicket:id=latestLookLink The Latest
Looks/A/LI
LI class=advanced wicket:id=pepsiStyleLinkA
hmm should'nt it be in or '' like this:
div id=header?
regards Nino
bhupat parmar wrote:
THE HEADER IS NOT WORKING
DIV id=header
UL
LIA href=# wicket:id=homeLinkHome/A/LI
LI id=current wicket:id=trendArchiveA href=#Trend
Archive/A/LI
LIA href=#
It's only a false alarm. Sorry. My fault. Probably I didn't perform a 'clean'
before the application has been deployed. The issue is CLOSED!
PS: Big 'THANK YOU' to Matej :).
Alex Objelean wrote:
Last post was completely wrong.
Here is another handler which works ok:
var
You're welcome :)
On 9/6/07, Alex Objelean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's only a false alarm. Sorry. My fault. Probably I didn't perform a 'clean'
before the application has been deployed. The issue is CLOSED!
PS: Big 'THANK YOU' to Matej :).
Alex Objelean wrote:
Last post was
the reason for it being final is that the super.onbeforerender() call HAS to
be done last, otherwise new items do not get onbeforerender called on them.
so if we remove final will you remember to always call it last? i think the
chances are that are pretty small, thus its final.
-igor
On
sushi
-igor
On 9/6/07, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
new PropertyModel(Page.this, session.foo.sushi.bar);
?
On 9/6/07, Gabor Szokoli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/5/07, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
can you make an jira issue for this?
Yes, you are right. All integration is just about adding something :-) .
The benefit of integration projects is that they care about the
integration. You don't have to manually download and install all those
resources.
But of couse you don't have to use it. Just add the CSS resources
The source code is available:
https://svn.cedarsoft.eu/open/eu.cedarsoft.wicket/trunk/yaml-integration/
Jan Mikkelsen wrote:
Hi Johannes
I think YAML looks extremely interesting. I did not know about it. But
commenting on your framework is difficult without sourcecode.
Best regards,
Jan
This might be of interest to the Wicket community:
http://www.javalobby.org/java/forums/t101110.html
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/And-The-Fastest-Growing-Web-Framework-Is...-tf4392768.html#a12524620
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
try using session.setLocale()
thats how i do it.
Regards
Dipu
On 9/6/07, Korbinian Bachl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
can anyone tell me how to change the default date pattern wicket should
use in the whole app?
I mean i can do:
add(new DatePicker() {
protected
a javadoc warning wont stop emails coming to this list :)
onbeforerendercalled() is also an ugly way, uglier then onpopulate() which
is at least more semantically named.
the root problem is that java does not contain a compiler directive that
would check for this, there is some support for this
I take the discussion is about removing onPopulate now?
why not keep onPopulate and remove the final?
On 9/6/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the reason for it being final is that the super.onbeforerender() call HAS
to
be done last, otherwise new items do not get onbeforerender
TSEE IS THAT AS LOUD AS YOU CAN GET?
On 9/6/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
WHAT IS WRONG WITH IT?
-IGOR
On 9/6/07, bhupat parmar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
THE HEADER IS NOT WORKING
DIV id=header
UL
LIA href=# wicket:id=homeLinkHome/A/LI
On 9/6/07, cowwoc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This might be of interest to the Wicket community:
If you really think about this.. It just means that it takes more
developers (jobs) in order to accomplish the same thing it takes with
just a handful of wicket developers :P So I guess if
http://www.indeed.com/jobtrends?q=java%2C+jsfl=
java is all you need to know for wicket
so jsf seems pretty low to me in that picture..
On 9/6/07, cowwoc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This might be of interest to the Wicket community:
http://www.javalobby.org/java/forums/t101110.html
--
View
UR RIGHT. THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN XHTML AND HTML IS THAT ATTRIBUTES MUST BE
QUOTED:
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/#diffs
Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael wrote:
hmm should'nt it be in or '' like this:
div id=header?
regards Nino
bhupat parmar wrote:
THE HEADER IS NOT WORKING
Robo wrote:
Ok, seems removing \wicket-velocity-1.3.0-beta3.jar\ from build
path solved problem with velocity problem. But please explain me why
removing package from build path solves the problem if nowhere in my
Hello World code i call for any of the velocity packages. Is there
some
Would it make sense to have a behavior that was implemented as a Chain
of Responsibility
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chain-of-responsibility_pattern
Then it would just be a matter of adding that behavior to your component.
On 9/6/07, Alex Objelean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am curious, what
Well, such charts do not make me fear to placed the bet on the wrong horse.
I've taken a look at a large number of frameworks and found Wicket to be the
best one for our purposes. This cannot be changed by such charts, but only
by JSF being better than Wicket.
In Germany, the best sold car is
In Germany, the best sold car is the VW Golf. But does this mean I should
buy one? No, there are a lot of better alternatives (in the meaning of
quality and design, for example).
really? i thought it was German Build Quality! The best there is!
Are there even better? (don't mention now
On 06 Sep 2007 11:44:56 +0200 (CEST), Robo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok Thnaks for explanation.
And do not look for truth in jokes. Jokes are just jokes ;-)
But you are not using Velocity panel right? Why do you include that
jar in the first place? You can just include the core wicket jar.
And why not? Besides that Wicket is doing some initialization of not used
libraries is there any restriction of not including not neccesary libraries in
classpath? Most time I develop someting I have many libraries in my classpath
even if I do not use them ...
Robo
- Originálna Správa
really? i thought it was German Build Quality! The best there is!
Are there even better? (don't mention now ofcourse other german brands ;) )
Trabant is German :)
Eelco
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
On 06 Sep 2007 17:23:13 +0200 (CEST), Robo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And why not? Besides that Wicket is doing some initialization of not used
libraries is there any restriction of not including not neccesary libraries
in classpath? Most time I develop someting I have many libraries in my
T-37 minutes until sushi time!
On 9/6/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sushi
-igor
On 9/6/07, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
new PropertyModel(Page.this, session.foo.sushi.bar);
?
On 9/6/07, Gabor Szokoli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/5/07,
Tauren Mills tauren at tauren.com writes:
Thanks everyone for the help. I got it working with the following jars:
log4j-1.2.15.jar
slf4j-api-1.4.2.jar
slf4j-log4j12-1.4.2.jar
Is that what others are using?
I had troubles while using logback, but I may not have used the right
jars
Java jars are nto at all complex beast. They become tricky in situation where
you just put some of them inclasspath and they do what you normally do not
expect. Lib should be lib and when not called by developer they should do
nothing. Deliberatly breaking this rule makes the jars, beast
After small troubles I had with it I know it. But from my point of view it is
not correct to initiatie not used libraries just by including it in App Server
classpath. From my point of view lib is lib, and when nto called by developer
it sould not be initiated by App server. I runned into
On 06 Sep 2007 18:11:09 +0200 (CEST), Robo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After small troubles I had with it I know it. But from my point of view it is
not correct to initiatie not used libraries just by including it in App
Server classpath. From my point of view lib is lib, and when nto called by
Alex:
We implemented a subclass of Form that has some sophisticated
validation and customized feedback panels built-in. This form
automatically instruments its fields with an ajax validating
behavior. But sometimes -not that often- a field needs to ajax-do a
bit more than just being validated, so
Sorry Eelco but me and also quite a lot of other developers(I know, contrary to
others developers) consider same b.s. libraries which are \alive\ just
because they are in classpath. It is like talking when nobody asks you ... Look
at Java SDK do you need all packages to build console \Hello
because the final is there for a very important reason?
-igor
On 9/6/07, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I take the discussion is about removing onPopulate now?
why not keep onPopulate and remove the final?
On 9/6/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the reason for it
I JUST LOVED HIS POST BECAUSE HE DOESNT SAY WHAT IS BROKEN. ID HATE TO SEE
HIS BUG REPORTS.
-IGOR
On 9/6/07, cwilkes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
UR RIGHT. THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN XHTML AND HTML IS THAT ATTRIBUTES MUST
BE
QUOTED:
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/#diffs
Nino Saturnino
you suck!
-igor
On 9/6/07, Evan Chooly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
T-37 minutes until sushi time!
On 9/6/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sushi
-igor
On 9/6/07, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
new PropertyModel(Page.this,
Yes I know Eelco. That is why there are so much troubles in Java programming
land. Misusing of basic concepts ... That is why one needs some sort of COC,
because there is lot`s of b.s. around ... J2EE 1.4 countained so much of it
that lots of developers refused to use it And it had to be
please tell me, tell me!
johan
On 9/6/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
because the final is there for a very important reason?
-igor
On 9/6/07, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I take the discussion is about removing onPopulate now?
why not keep onPopulate and
can you send some over?
On 9/6/07, Evan Chooly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
T-37 minutes until sushi time!
On 9/6/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sushi
-igor
On 9/6/07, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
new PropertyModel(Page.this,
Per,
use a AbstractReadOnlyModel or a DetachableLoadableModel for the
attribute value.
Regards,
Carlos
On 9/6/07, Per Newgro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok. I tried the Attribute Modifier(String, String, boolean, Model)
Constructor but it didn't worked. There have been exactly the same results.
Or a PropertyModel.
On 9/6/07, Carlos Pita [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Per,
use a AbstractReadOnlyModel or a DetachableLoadableModel for the
attribute value.
Regards,
Carlos
On 9/6/07, Per Newgro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok. I tried the Attribute Modifier(String, String, boolean, Model)
the problem with this stuff is that there is no single pattern that will
work
sometimes you want a chain where if a link fails the chain shortcircuits
other times you dont want the shortcircuit
sometimes you care about the order, other times you do not
there are many variations of this and they
You can use Ivy to resolve wicket dependencies and produce a report, if you
have trouble to generate a report with maven ATM. The report details may be
slightly different from what you get with m2, since Ivy is not 100%
compatible with m2, but it's better than nothing. If you're interested, I
can
On 06 Sep 2007 17:35:26 +0200 (CEST), Robo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stop it now please Al. You take oo personal aproach. Nobody forced you in
responding.
heh, what you have to understand is that wicket is oss - so it IS personal.
it is something we work on in our spare time so it is kind of a
Worked like a charm, thanks Kent.
You the same Kent Tong that wrote a online Tapestry book?
Kent Tong wrote:
pokkie wrote:
My question is, how do I use this information to get the selected entity
which represents a row in my listView?
Try:
public class Test extends
On 06 Sep 2007 18:24:44 +0200 (CEST), Robo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry Eelco but me and also quite a lot of other developers(I know, contrary
to others developers) consider same b.s. libraries which are \alive\ just
because they are in classpath. It is like talking when nobody asks you ...
On 06 Sep 2007 18:32:44 +0200 (CEST), Robo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes I know Eelco. That is why there are so much troubles in Java programming
land. Misusing of basic concepts ... That is why one needs some sort of COC,
because there is lot`s of b.s. around ... J2EE 1.4 countained so much
On 9/6/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the problem with this stuff is that there is no single pattern that will
work
sometimes you want a chain where if a link fails the chain shortcircuits
other times you dont want the shortcircuit
sometimes you care about the order, other times
and?
why can't AbstractRepeater.onBeforeRender() be not final?
If i overwrite to do what ever i want (but i do need to call onBeforeRender
at some point else we generate an error)
then it comes in AbstractRepeater.onBeforeRender()
that first does the onPopulate so the items are created and then
the custom serialization is already off by default for quite some time
the
org.apache.wicket.util.io.SerializableChecker$WicketNotSerializableException:
only kicks in (so also for the default) when an IOException happens with
writeObject
So that you get a nice trace which field it exactly is of
that worked - thank you
Best Regards,
Korbinian
Francis De Brabandere schrieb:
You can override newConverterLocator in your Application
@Override
protected IConverterLocator newConverterLocator() {
ConverterLocator locator = new ConverterLocator();
no not for the onces that make a Repeater.
Because then we aren't being able to tell that the populate should really be
done before the call to super.onBeforeRender
So having an onPopulate is fine. Repeaters should use that method to
populate them selfs and we then also take care of the order
but
Sorry Eelco but I did not start this small personal war. In my previus of topic
marked post I said lot of good about wicket and made lot of PLEASE do this ...
I know you have lot of work ... IMHO ... and so on ... Also thanked to Gwyn?
... :-))) Al getted touched about my troubles with Maven,
if it was not final then there would be little point for keeping onpopulate,
it would just be confusing
-igor
On 9/6/07, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and?
why can't AbstractRepeater.onBeforeRender() be not final?
If i overwrite to do what ever i want (but i do need to call
If you care about the product of your own work, it 's personal. O.S.S. is
based on self motivated developers who, by definition, care about their
work.
On 06 Sep 2007 19:36:36 +0200 (CEST), Robo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No Igor. Software is never personal. war is personal, dying of my mother,
Ok when the user press the submit button on a wicket form, how do you make
it go to another page? onSubmit has a void return
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
thats why i said the concreet repeaters that implement onPopulate should
make them final
also what do you mean with funny errors,
you only get funny errors when you override both or 1 and start calling the
other.
calling super on different times in your onBeforeRender doesn't create
anything funny
Is there something like listview that I configure for displaying text and
images? I do not need any sorting ..
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I'm trying to create a disableable AjaxSubmitLink. When a user clicks on the
link further clicks must not result in anything until the 'submission' is
complete. This call be achieved by adding return false; in a call decorator.
However I'm stuggling with the re-enabling. I need to strip
ok,
i don't like to have onBeforeRender final because we have the whole i called
the super check for that.
But i do like the onPopulate because that makes much more clear that the
repeaters do there there work
because why should that happen in onBeforeRender? The api does speak for
them self then
I am using Wicket 1.2.6. I have 3 DropDownChoices (and some other fields) on
a form.
The first DropDownChoice resets the selections in the other DropDownChoices
using AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior(onchange). All the DropDownChoices
use PropertyModels.
This all works fine until the form is
you can build your own component very easily. listview can contain
labels and/or images in any way you desire.
Aaron Hutchings wrote:
Is there something like listview that I configure for displaying text and
images? I do not need any sorting ..
who? that overrides onBeforeRender?
why should those call super last?
that depends on what they want.
On 9/6/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
because we are going in circles here
even with onpopulate you still have to make sure you call super last!
-igor
On 9/6/07, Johan
sure no problem, just point them out :)
On 9/6/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
well, whenever those emails comein...why doesnt onbeforerender is getting
called...you can answer them :)
-igor
On 9/6/07, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
who? that overrides
Hello,
In the repeteater samples, the one with ajax capability you have
DetachableContactModel.
My question is why
protected Object load()
{
// loads contact from the database
return getContactsDB().get(id);
}
does not just return the Contact object?
It is already determined by the
pokkie wrote:
Worked like a charm, thanks Kent.
You the same Kent Tong that wrote a online Tapestry book?
Yep.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/AjaxFallbackLink-inside-ListView-tf4389622.html#a12534270
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
