On Nov 2, 2007 3:26 AM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
if we rename it then we should also rename Component.RENDER action to
Component.VISIBLE
Perhaps something for after 1.3 is released?
Maurice
-
To unsubscribe,
i think that's what i called imbricated :))
On 11/1/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
wait until you discover we support embedded forms, that will really
screw with your mind...
-igor
On 11/1/07, Cristi Manole [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i am so sorry for your time. looked for
On 11/1/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
if we rename it then we should also rename Component.RENDER action to
Component.VISIBLE
Do you really think it is worth it renaming this late in the game?
Eelco
-
To
Hello...
I want to support a URL like this:
http://host/webapp/home/?userid=foopassword=barsubmit=true
The page is meant to perform login.
When both userid and password are correct, I want to pass to the following
page directly.
This works well.
When the password is wrong, I want an
I solved the problem by creating custom add and remove buttons. It turned out
that the original buttons that are used by Palette are not subclasses of
Button but subclasses of WebMarkupContainer and hence they don't properly
support disabled state and generating of markup id. I wonder why plain
By the way, Component.RENDER doesn't have to be renamed for me either.
Maybe add one extra method to component:
isVisibleAllowed() that checks both properties: isRenderedAllowed and
isVisible()
and that method is again called for every component in the hierachy in
isVisibleInHiearchy()
i think
Great.
On 11/2/07, Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks, I've assigned the issue to me, will look at it as soon as I have
time.
-Matej
On 11/1/07, Francisco Diaz Trepat - gmail
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Done, I reported the issue. Attached the Ziped QuickStart and added the
FIX
Thanks, I've assigned the issue to me, will look at it as soon as I have time.
-Matej
On 11/1/07, Francisco Diaz Trepat - gmail
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Done, I reported the issue. Attached the Ziped QuickStart and added the FIX
or a Fix in the form of a Comment.
Please let me know as I
Just some thoughts I have on the issue...
Johan Compagner wrote:
they are not really 2 concepts, if something is not visible then it
wont be rendered or if something is not rendered then it is not
visible, so isRenderedAllowed() is just isVisibleAllowed(), So rename
it??
Note that your
I think this should wait after 1.3. And I'm not the one who's usually
hesitating what it comes to breaking stuff :)
-Matej
On 11/2/07, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/1/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
if we rename it then we should also rename Component.RENDER action
what servlet container are you using? i think this problem popped up
on weblogic before and was due to a combination of a weblogic bug and
the particular servlet mapping that was used.
does the behavior happen to all form components or just some
particular one? try it without that funky onerror()
this is how enabled works:
the actual outcome of whether something will end up being enabled or
not is the combination of isEnabled()isEnabledAllowed()
for visibility it is currently: isVisible()isRenderAllowed() which
makes little sense to me because i have to deal with two concepts:
visibility
webmarkupcontainers were used because the buttons do not need to
submit anything to serverside, they are just there to add an onclick
javascript. i agree they dont handle disabling properly and that is a
bug, please open a jira issue.
-igor
On 11/2/07, wheleph [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I
this will make it hugely inconsistent with how isenabled()
isenabledallowed() works.
-igor
On 11/2/07, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
By the way, Component.RENDER doesn't have to be renamed for me either.
Maybe add one extra method to component:
isVisibleAllowed() that checks both
make sure you are opening your popup in a different pagemap
-igor
On 11/2/07, pixotec [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm developing a CMS in wicket and have a selfmade wysiwyg textarea in the
page.
when clicking on insert image an image dialog is opened in a new window.
the dialog is a wicket
Hey all,
Sorry to be the wicket newbie, but I was wondering if you guys could help me
to understand how Links work.
I understand that when you do Link(SomePage.class), it calls the zero param
constructor of SomePage, and when you do Link(new SomePage(someParams)) you
can call other
I have a problem while doing this...
I am using Wicket 1.2.6 and when I attempt to leave the page after modifying
the form, the alert pops up, but if I select Cancel, in order to remain in
the page, everything that had Ajax stops working, without any visible
errors.
Any ideas? Did anyone had the
I have a question about the TabbedPanel. I've got a page that has a header,
body, and footer. I've got a tabbedpanel with 3 tabs (each with a list of
BookmarkablePageLinkssort of a submenu) in the header. When you click
on a BookmarkablePageLink it loads the correct panel into the body of
Nino.Martinez wrote:
have you mounted the page?
I want to support a URL like this:
http://host/webapp/home/?userid=foopassword=barsubmit=true
Well, no. I haven't.
Even without mounting, in the absence of *submit* the *userid* and
*password* parameters show up nicely in the page after
On 11/1/07, mfs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks igor, that really clarifies a lot of things..a couple of followup
question though..
So as you said versioning is implemented to handle the back button (and
subsequently forward properly, but i wonder if wicket enforces a hit to
the server on a
for visibility it is currently: isVisible()isRenderAllowed() which
makes little sense to me because i have to deal with two concepts:
visibility and rendering. from my point of view as a user i dont care
to know about rendering, i just want to plop my components down and
tweak their
Yeah, I was using a dedicated vm as well. It was interesting to see what some
of our sites looked like under older versions of IE (3-5.5), but beyond that I
can't see any practical reasons to do so. However, it is useful to have IE6
IE7 running under the same machine. Glad it could be of use
Johan Compagner wrote:
true that if something is not rendered then it is not visible. The
problem is that the you're confusing the name of the visible property
with what it means, namely:
isVisible() means is visible IF the component is allowed to render
But the problem is that that line
Has anyone successfully setup JBoss jBPM with Wicket?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is it correct that the jira entry says it is fixed in beta4? Because we use
beta4 and the title still needs a Model instead of an IModel.
Cheers
Per
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi folks,
I just stumbled on a situation where it would be useful to have two or more
wicket:child / tags in a base page. Just consider a layout that consists
of the usual footer, header, navigation, and content parts. But now, the
content should be arranged in two columns, e.g. two different
security is bypassed anyways because most component writers will
forget to do the double check. so neither solution is good.
-igor
On 11/2/07, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
for visibility it is currently: isVisible()isRenderAllowed() which
makes little sense to me because i
have you mounted the page?
Hubert Kauker wrote:
Hello...
I want to support a URL like this:
http://host/webapp/home/?userid=foopassword=barsubmit=true
The page is meant to perform login.
When both userid and password are correct, I want to pass to the following
page directly.
This works
can you make sure your servlet mapping is of form /foo/*
-igor
Yes it's of that form.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
this has been discussed multiple times on this list, search the
archives. the conclusion has always been that what you want can be
accomplished by factory methods on the basepage that generate panels.
-igor
On 11/2/07, Stefan Fußenegger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi folks,
I just stumbled on
true that if something is not rendered then it is not visible. The
problem is that the you're confusing the name of the visible property
with what it means, namely:
isVisible() means is visible IF the component is allowed to render
But the problem is that that line above is not true...
Anyone comming to the øredev developer congress...?
regards Nino
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 11/2/07, William Hoover [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone successfully setup JBoss jBPM with Wicket?
Several people who I know. You can use jBPM like any regular Java API.
Eelco
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks for that awesomely fast reply!
I found an excellent thread in the archives that explains this topic very
well - I swear I searched before, but obviously with the wrong keywords ;)
http://www.nabble.com/Multiple-wicket%3Achild-tags-in-the-same-page-tf3775143.html
To sum it up for those
igor.vaynberg wrote:
On 11/1/07, mfs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks igor, that really clarifies a lot of things..a couple of followup
question though..
So as you said versioning is implemented to handle the back button (and
subsequently forward properly, but i wonder if wicket enforces
I guess what I'm really asking is if anyone actually composed the UI
integration piece that supports the API (similar to the JBoss jBPM webapp) so
that all of the controller variables could be seamlessly linked to models.
-Original Message-
From: Eelco Hillenius [mailto:[EMAIL
I do that..i mean this scenario is still sort of comprehensible where i say i
want to view the previous page via a go-back link (and we can certainly
achieve that with the way u mentioned)..but i what i would really want to
know are some real life examples/scenarios/use-cases where i would come
Hi,
You mostly get NoSuchMethodErrors if one of the slf4j jars on your
classpath is too old. But I guess you already knew that. You may find
more help on the sl4j site.
Regards,
Erik.
PS. on the dev list there was a vote with the result that Wicket 1.3 RC1
will be build (not
you have to use slf4j version 1.4.2 (instead of 1.0.x) in your pom file
Gerolf
On Nov 2, 2007 8:11 PM, landry soules [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello
Please Al, what is the fix for this problem with slf4j ?
I spent half a day trying every possible combination between log4j and
slf4j, and got
for scenarios like those simply pass the page instance to another page
class secondsteppage extends webpage {
public secondsteppage(page first) {
add(new link(go-back) { onclick() { setresponsepage(first); }});
}
}
-igor
On 11/2/07, mfs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
igor.vaynberg wrote:
It appears that the issue http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-606
that was fixed in beta2 is broken again in beta4. Basically TextFields for
Strings (configured with the defaults) are always converting to empty
strings. They should convert to null by default based on the
Sorry, that is just a typo. Will be fixed in a second.
-Matej
On 11/2/07, Per Newgro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it correct that the jira entry says it is fixed in beta4? Because we use
beta4 and the title still needs a Model instead of an IModel.
Cheers
Per
Thanks for your answers, but still no success :
I tried (once again) to use maven to generate a brand new project, but
eclipse freezes when i import the project generated with mvn
eclipse:eclipse -DdownloadSources=true...
Is there something i'm missing ? In my classpath, i have
If you see that it is broken, then please open the issue again. If it
is, before fixing we really need to create a test case for this so
that when we fix it, it stays fixed.
Eelco
On 11/2/07, Dan Syrstad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It appears that the issue
Hi landry,
Did you modify the SLF version specified in the created pom.xml before
trying to import it?
/Gwyn
Friday, November 2, 2007, 8:36:37 PM, landry soules [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ls Thanks for your answers, but still no success :
ls I tried (once again) to use maven to generate a brand
Actually, i didn't go on with maven, since my project is already quite
advanced now, i don't want to reconfigure it to use maven. I just tried to
create a sample project to figure out what is the correct combination of
slf4j/log4j to use (bad idea, since it appears to be broken in the original
I found an excellent thread in the archives that explains this topic
very
well - I swear I searched before, but obviously with the wrong
keywords ;)
http://www.nabble.com/Multiple-wicket%3Achild-tags-in-the-same-page-tf37
75143.html
Multiple child/extends pairs (where you have to see such a
Hi Doug,
It is hard to say without knowing more about your app. As a rule, I
never keep references to data in my components. Components have only
refs to services (injectable) and all the data are encapsulated by
IModels of one sort or another. The IModels always implement
IDetachable and keep
I've been trying to figure out why when I hit my wicket page, it loads
three times. I discovered this while debugging...my constructor was
called three times for my derived WebPage.
I've captured the call stack produced by the three calls. (See below)
In my web browser I'm merely pasting the
Hey Igor -
Thanks for the reply. Unfortunately I am still having some trouble finding
the solution for this. I've been using nabble to search the forums and so
far I cannot find anything of use (perhaps my search terms aren't
effective).
it seems that main problem is that when invalidating a
Hi,
setObject() is not supported on LoadableDetachableModel because it extends
AbstractReadOnlyModel.
What is the reason for this?
This way LoadableDetachableModel cannot be used with form controls.
In my case I have a DropDownChoice with a list of non-serializable objects.
What kind of model
what servlet container are you using? i think this problem popped up
on weblogic before and was due to a combination of a weblogic bug and
the particular servlet mapping that was used.
Tomcat 5.5.20
does the behavior happen to all form components or just some
particular one?
All
empty src attributes in img tags seem to cause this kind of problems.
Not sure if that is your case though.
Martijn
On 11/2/07, Devin Venable [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been trying to figure out why when I hit my wicket page, it loads
three times. I discovered this while debugging...my
It would be quite feasible to add support for multiple overridden
sections using the above tag names while remaining backwards compatible
with existing markup by continuing to support the old child/extends
tags working the way they always have.
It's kind of a predictable answer, but the best
setObject() is not supported on LoadableDetachableModel because it extends
AbstractReadOnlyModel.
What is the reason for this?
Because load is an algorithm to get the value; if you set the value
you have two different ways of getting that value which gets
inconsistent easily.
This way
It would be quite feasible to add support for multiple overridden
sections using the above tag names while remaining backwards
compatible
with existing markup by continuing to support the old
child/extends
tags working the way they always have.
It's kind of a predictable answer, but the
There's nothing I would love more right now than to have to time to
implement a patch to support multiple overridden sections in a wicket
page but unfortunately time is one thing I don't seem to have much of
these days. I can't believe 2007 is almost over - heck, where did this
year go?
Tell
There's nothing I would love more right now than to have to time to
implement a patch to support multiple overridden sections in a
wicket
page but unfortunately time is one thing I don't seem to have much
of
these days. I can't believe 2007 is almost over - heck, where did
this
year go?
boolean loggedIn = session.get().isSignedIn();
MySignInForm.setVisible(!loggedIn);
then you can set your expired page settings to point to the page with your
SignInForm
hope this assists your design decision
why should you invalidate a session by passing parameter to another page
why not just
Could it be because the form page is bookmarkable?
thats odd, all the values should be preserved, thats our rawinput that
all formcomponents have. Do you have a repeater/listview around your
formcomponents.
On 11/1/07, Chris Colman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've created a form and set up
why dont you submit a quickstart and then we can figure out why its happening
-igor
On 11/2/07, Chris Colman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could it be because the form page is bookmarkable?
thats odd, all the values should be preserved, thats our rawinput that
all formcomponents have. Do you
62 matches
Mail list logo
