http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/dropdownchoice.html
Hoover, William wrote:
Can you add this to the wiki
(http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/dropdownchoice-examples.html)? It seems like
a commonly asked question :o)
-
To
This thread is the accompanying discussion thread for the ongoing vote
on the same subject. Please use this discussion thread for voicing
your opinion or asking questions. This makes counting the votes much
easier.
The discussion on our development list makes it clear that a lot of
folks are
+1
Regards,
Edward Yakop
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ouch - this is a tough one, as I personally only write projects in Java 5+
but I often
work in Java 1.4 when I do consulting as most companies in telco and
finance still
use Java 1.4. But whatever you chose to do, you will cut off some so I say:
+1
--
Lars Borup Jensen
+1
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[X] +1, Wicket 1.4 is 1.3 + generics, drop support for 1.3
[ ] -1, I need a supported version running on Java 1.4
Thijs
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 9:22 AM, Jan Vissers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Azzeddine Daddah
www.hbiloo.com
Hi,
I was wondering to what extent it is possible to have generics added to
1.3 but have it compile to 1.4 if necessary? Isn't that a just a
question of not using other Java 1.5 constructs such as enums and new
JDK classes? Wouldn't that solve most people's problems that need to
stick to
+1
--
Wouter Huijnink
Func. Internet Integration
W http://www.func.nl
T +31 20 423
F +31 20 4223500
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1
Ari S.
- Original Message -
From: Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Wicket Development [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wicket Users
users@wicket.apache.org
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2008 10:13 AM
Subject: [vote] Release 1.4 with only generics and stop support for 1.3
This thread is
+1
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1
On 3/17/08, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This thread is for voting only. Use the [discuss] thread for voicing
your opinion or asking questions. This makes counting the votes much
easier.
The discussion on our development list makes it clear that a lot of
folks are anxious
I am not sure what do you mean by component generated by columns. I make the
treeTable like following:
PropertyRenderableColumn col2 = new PropertyRenderableColumn(m,
description, userObject.description);
PropertyTreeColumn col1 = new PropertyTreeColumn(l, title,
userObject.title);
columns = new
Response inline
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 9:13 AM, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Why should we keep supporting 1.3 and JDK 1.4?
Would 1.3 + Java 5 still be supported, or will support for 1.3 be dropped
totally? If so, it would then be nice that an upgrade from 1.3 with Java5
will
+1
Regards,
Bernard
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
This thread is for voting only. Use the [discuss] thread for voicing
your opinion or asking questions. This makes counting the votes much
easier.
The discussion on our development list makes it clear that a lot of
folks are anxious for generified
[x] +1, Wicket 1.4 is 1.3 + generics, drop support for 1.3
[ ] -1, I need a supported version running on Java 1.4
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[x] +1, Wicket 1.4 is 1.3 + generics, drop support for 1.3
- Juha
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
This thread is for voting only. Use the [discuss] thread for voicing
your opinion or asking questions. This makes counting the votes much
easier.
The discussion on our development list makes it clear
Hi everyone,
Does anyone try to do any scalability tests with wicket? How is it
suitable for real world enterprise level applications? And the most
important question: What are the design principals I should follow in
order to turn my homemade application into a real, highly responsive
and
+1
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Johan,
Many thanks for your answer.
A real world enterprise level app is usually about complex user
interface and many many concurrent users at one time.
When I told about real world applications I meant mostly a
comparison with some other popular frameworks like JSF. It wasn't
To have more control over the options, you have to use
org.apache.wicket.extensions.markup.html.form.select.Select
There's a usage example in the javadoc.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
afaik, it's not (easily) possible with DropDownChoice.
Take a look at the Select, SelectOption, SelectOptions classes in
wicket-extensions,
as they give you more power over the single options.
Gerolf
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 10:43 AM, Kaspar Fischer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Is there an easy
[X] +1, Wicket 1.4 is 1.3 + generics, drop support for 1.3
[ ] -1, I need a supported version running on Java 1.4
-Stephan
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
This thread is for voting only. Use the [discuss] thread for voicing
your opinion or asking questions. This makes counting the votes much
easier.
On Tue, 11 Mar 2008, tsuresh wrote:
When I click on the next name the output is User selected: Bob. i.e. The
first output comes in second click and second ouput comes in third click
and so on. My code is as shown below: Where am I missing ? Please help.
String username =;
Link
+1
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
This thread is for voting only. Use the [discuss] thread for voicing
your opinion or asking questions. This makes counting the votes much
easier.
The discussion on our development list makes it clear that a lot of
folks are anxious for generified models. Most users
Hi all,
I'm using the MultiFileUploadField on a page derived from the example
one http://wicketstuff.org/wicket13/upload/multi. Now I'd like to
show the progress, but not of the upload itself, as the files are not
that big. Instead, the time consuming part is some processing that is
done for
Hmm... bummer. :-)
How hard can it be to throw out all references to generics and insert
the casts where necessary? :-) But you're right... at least in eclipse
it complains if you put the source compliance level higher than the
class file compliance level...
Regards,
Sebastiaan
Johan
we have our own threadtest (see svn) to test scaling
What is a real world enterprise level app?
Is that about the complexitiy of the user inteface and the application
itself?
or is it that it is used by many many concurrent users at one time but the
app is pretty simple?
About design
dont think you can compile java 5 source (with generics) to 1.4
you have to use something like retroweaver then
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 9:27 AM, Sebastiaan van Erk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering to what extent it is possible to have generics added to
1.3 but have it compile to
+1
--
// Et quid amabo nisi quod rerum enigma est?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1
Regards
Dipu
+1
On Thu, 13 Mar 2008, Edvin Syse wrote:
try {
// work
} catch (Exception e) {
error(e.getMessage());
}
But this way you lose the stack trace, right?
Maybe error(e) would be better?
Best wishes,
Timo
--
Timo Rantalaiho
Reaktor Innovations OyURL:
+1
Regards,
Kaspar
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
where is the complex JSF app that has many many concurrent users?
Most of the time the more complex the app gets the less concurrent users it
will have.
Because those kind of complex apps are mostly targetted at a specific group
of people.
Where are for example Enterprise level apps just open on
Is there an easy way to disable items in a DropDownChoice?
I'd like to output something like this:
option value=12 disabled=disabledItem/option
Kaspar
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
I am just looking at the number of job offers for JSF :) It's a
lot! That demand means that there are a lot of development in JSF.
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 11:38 AM, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
where is the complex JSF app that has many many concurrent users?
Most of the time
or it means that JSF development is a slow process and you need a lot of
devs to meet a deadline ;)
Vitaly Tsaplin wrote:
I am just looking at the number of job offers for JSF :) It's a
lot! That demand means that there are a lot of development in JSF.
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 11:38 AM,
Wicket is just so much more efficient to code you do not need so many
developers...
2008/3/17, Vitaly Tsaplin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I am just looking at the number of job offers for JSF :) It's a
lot! That demand means that there are a lot of development in JSF.
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at
+1 Wicket 1.4 is 1.3 + generics, drop support for 1.3
Vatroslav
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/-vote--Release-1.4-with-only-generics-and-stop-support-for-1.3-tp16090054p16091936.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
+1
On 3/17/08, Jay Hogan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For that you just need strict project managers with experience in JSF... ;)
2008/3/17, Thies Edeling [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
or it means that JSF development is a slow process and you need a lot of
devs to meet a deadline ;)
Vitaly Tsaplin wrote:
I am just looking at the number of job
For all I know, wicket is free.
2008/3/17, Vitaly Tsaplin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
No, I am not advocating JSF at all :) I agree with all you gays.
Wicket is just like a fresh air in a web development. I am just trying
to realize what is the price to pay for such a pleasure :)
On Mon, Mar
Thank you Igor, that resolved the problem with the exception.
Jim
igor.vaynberg wrote:
public void setUp()
{
tester = new WicketTester(new MyApplication());
}
-igor
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 11:27 AM, jnorris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi everyone,
The
Why does a quick release imply dropping 1.3?
IMO if we do a 1.4m1 release and then slowly add additional stuff to
1.4 we could continue to support 1.3.
Not that i need 1.3 but it just seems odd to throw away 1.3 so quickly
after we released it.
AFAIK we have the following branches:
1.2.x :
If you read the planning thread, you see that a lot of folks want to
move to the generified Wicket version and don't want to wait 6-8
months to deploy on their production boxes.
Martijn
On 3/17/08, Maurice Marrink [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why does a quick release imply dropping 1.3?
IMO if we
i had read that thread, but i guess i did not realize they do not want
a milestone release on production.
personally i have no problem with that.
Thanks for clearing that up.
Maurice
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 12:38 PM, Martijn Dashorst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you read the planning thread, you
+1
-Original Message-
From: Martijn Dashorst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2008 4:13 AM
To: Wicket Development; Wicket Users
Subject: [vote] Release 1.4 with only generics and stop support for 1.3
This thread is for voting only. Use the [discuss] thread for voicing
yes, generics! It would make the model business so much more clear.
ryan
Enrique Rodriguez wrote:
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 9:32 PM, Ned Collyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FWIW +1 to java5 and 1.3.
Generics == joy, especially with the model stuff wicket uses :)
Same here; would like to see
+1
ryan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1
Maurice
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 1:34 PM, Ryan McKinley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
ryan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1
Maarten
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 1:42 PM, Maurice Marrink [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
Maurice
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 1:34 PM, Ryan McKinley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
ryan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[X] +1, Wicket 1.4 is 1.3 + generics, drop support for 1.3
Regards,
Sebastiaan
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
+1 Wicket 1.4 is 1.3 + generics, drop support for 1.3
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 7:08 AM, James Carman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
On 3/17/08, Jay Hogan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
[ ] +1, Wicket 1.4 is 1.3 + generics, drop support for 1.3
[ ] -1, I need a supported version running on Java 1.4
+1
regards, --- jan.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
Hi,
On a DataTable I want to have a sortable column whose cell's are links. How
do how do that?
Best regards,
Johnnie
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Links-on-a-sortable-column-tp16092890p16092890.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
create a panel that contains your links, and add that to the column.
Martijn
On 3/17/08, Johnnie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On a DataTable I want to have a sortable column whose cell's are links. How
do how do that?
Best regards,
Johnnie
--
View this message in context:
+1
/Per
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/-vote--Release-1.4-with-only-generics-and-stop-support-for-1.3-tp16090054p16092891.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To
Hello,
In my web applicaction I have a form with a panel into that generates fields
and buttons dynamically. for these button i would like to make form
validation but I don't want to submit.
In order to do this I set DefaultFormProcessing to false which is quite good
beacause it does not use the
+1
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
This thread is for voting only. Use the [discuss] thread for voicing
your opinion or asking questions. This makes counting the votes much
easier.
The discussion on our development list makes it clear that a lot of
folks are anxious for generified models. Most
If you subclass form you can use validate.
Maurice
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 3:33 PM, BertrandDatas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
In my web applicaction I have a form with a panel into that generates fields
and buttons dynamically. for these button i would like to make form
validation
there are a couple of options to deal with stuff like this, most
commonly your onsubmit would submit the form to a hidden iframe and
start an ajax poller on the main page to show progress
-igor
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 2:20 AM, Thomas Kappler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I'm using
or even better, it should really be something like this
class deleteuserlink extends link {
protected void oncomponenttag(tag) {
string uname=((user)getmodelobject()).getusername();
tag.put(onclick, return alert('are you sure you want to
delete +uname.
}
}
and in your code
I made the changes you suggested and the updateTree() call didn't refresh the
tree. I had to add the call target.addComponent(tree) back in. Here is the
latest:
TreeNodeFactory factory = TreeNodeFactory.getObject();
BaseTreeNode newNode = factory.buildReplaceNode(treePanel,
Anyone know what repository that the wicket-suckerfish menus are available in
(non-svn)?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/-vote--Release-1.4-with-only-generics-and-stop-support-for-1.3-tp16090054p16095578.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To
+1
Am Montag, 17. März 2008 09:13:29 schrieb Martijn Dashorst:
This thread is for voting only. Use the [discuss] thread for voicing
your opinion or asking questions. This makes counting the votes much
easier.
The discussion on our development list makes it clear that a lot of
folks are
+1
[ ] +1, Wicket 1.4 is 1.3 + generics, drop support for 1.3
[ ] -1, I need a supported version running on Java 1.4
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1, Wicket 1.4 is 1.3 + generics, drop support for 1.3
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 3:13 AM, Martijn Dashorst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This thread is for voting only. Use the [discuss] thread for voicing
your opinion or asking questions. This makes counting the votes much
easier.
The discussion
Hi,
I am using the filter toolbar with filter form within a DefaultDataTable
very similar to the phonebook example. I also use the GoAndClearFilter.
The problem is the clear function: If I press the clear button the
filter form modal seems to be updated/cleared because all (non filtered)
Hoover, William schrieb:
Anyone know what repository that the wicket-suckerfish menus are available in
(non-svn)?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi, I'm affriad I won't be able to help you more until you provide a
quickstart. This might be a bug in wicket and quickstart would help me
reproduce the problem so that i could fix it.
-Matej
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 5:09 PM, jeredm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I made the changes you suggested
[X] +1, Wicket 1.4 is 1.3 + generics, drop support for 1.3
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/-vote--Release-1.4-with-only-generics-and-stop-support-for-1.3-tp16090054p16096362.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Thanks, but I was looking for a way I could include it in a maven project with
a dependency tag. I need to know what maven repository that this project is
housed?
-Original Message-
From: Kai Mütz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2008 12:42 PM
To:
Hoover, William schrieb:
Thanks, but I was looking for a way I could include it in a maven project with
a dependency tag. I need to know what maven repository that this project is
housed?
I have installed it in a local maven repository.
-1
lonely, Juan
I just found that the browser appears to be part of the problem. I am
running IE6 with Windows 2000...so SP1. I ran the same test with IE7 and
the same test took about 10 seconds. I used a Windows Vista Ultimate box
for the IE7 test, but the hardware should be pretty close between the two
You might check out this control.
http://www.inmethod.com/
I have not used it outside of the demo on the website, but somebody
suggested it to me when I was asking about sorting. I was looking for a
drag and drop sort, so I didn't use the control. This control does have
sortable and resizable
+1
--
Fabrizio Giudici, Ph.D. - Java Architect, Project Manager
Tidalwave s.a.s. - We make Java work. Everywhere.
weblogs.java.net/blog/fabriziogiudici - www.tidalwave.it/blog
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - mobile: +39 348.150.6941
-
[ ] +1, Wicket 1.4 is 1.3 + generics, drop support for 1.3
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/-vote--Release-1.4-with-only-generics-and-stop-support-for-1.3-tp16090054p16097038.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
+1
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 1:15 PM, djo.mos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ ] +1, Wicket 1.4 is 1.3 + generics, drop support for 1.3
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/-vote--Release-1.4-with-only-generics-and-stop-support-for-1.3-tp16090054p16097038.html
Sent from the
I used the Data Table Example on this page for sorting/pagination:
http://www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples/repeater/
Here's code I did to make the cells in one of the columns into links:
columns.add(new PropertyColumn(new Model(Title), title, title)
{
// Build
naah, man. jsf is not an enterprise ready framework. just look for
struts jobs, there are like 30x more then jsf jobs. struts is the real
enterprise-ready web framework.
-igor
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 3:58 AM, Vitaly Tsaplin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am just looking at the number of job
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 1:13 AM, Martijn Dashorst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Everybody is invited to vote! Please use
[ X ] +1, Wicket 1.4 is 1.3 + generics, drop support for 1.3
[ ] -1, I need a supported version running on Java 1.4
Enrique
One more note. The updateTree() call did work in Firefox, but not in IE6 or
IE7.
Matej Knopp-2 wrote:
Hi,
you shouldn't do target.addComponent(tree). You shouldo only call
tree.upateTree() (or tree.updateTree(target), should do the same
thing). Also you could consider using
+1
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You might want to look at sharethis.com I'm not affiliated with them and
it's not wicket related but it may be just what you're looking for.
-Original Message-
From: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 15, 2008 12:05 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org; [EMAIL
+1
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 1:13 AM, Martijn Dashorst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This thread is for voting only. Use the [discuss] thread for voicing
your opinion or asking questions. This makes counting the votes much
easier.
The discussion on our development list makes it clear that a lot
[X] +1, Wicket 1.4 is 1.3 + generics, drop support for 1.3
Martin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jonas, Gerolf, thanks a lot for your answers! I've just set up my build
environment to use the latest wicket-extensions -- great!
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I am using a ListView to render the dynamic number of select boxes and
their options.
I have added all select boxes into a ListView object and listView into a
form and trying to calculate a final price using all selected values from
select boxes.
However, when I submit the
Martijn Dashorst schrieb:
Everybody is invited to vote! Please use
[ ] +1, Wicket 1.4 is 1.3 + generics, drop support for 1.3
[ ] -1, I need a supported version running on Java 1.4
Let your voices be heard!
+1
-
To
Hi guys,
It seams that there is a bug in the FormComponent code. I try to
override chechRequired method but it seams to not work at all.
Here is a snippet from the sources. As you can see there is a
second requirement check.
/**
* Checks if the raw input value is not
Hello,
Is it possible to have pretty dataview urls when someone clicks on different
pages of the navigator? Right now it says stuff like ::interface.7.1 or
something. I'd prefer it to say something like /home?page=7
You can mount your page using HybridUrlCodingStrateg. The resulting
url won't carry the currently selected page information, but it will
be much nicer than a interface listener url you are having now.
-Matej
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 7:07 PM, Dan Kaplan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Is it
Can you use the Ajax version?
On 3/17/08, Dan Kaplan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Is it possible to have pretty dataview urls when someone clicks on different
pages of the navigator? Right now it says stuff like ::interface.7.1 or
something. I'd prefer it to say something like
the following works for me:
// in your callback method
PageParameters params = new PageParameters();
params.put(page, getPageNumber());
setResponsePage(MyPage.class, params);
setRedirect(true);
where MyPage.class would typically be the same page the component is on.
to make it more generic, you
+1
Stefan Jozsa
-
Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your homepage.
Creating new page version every time...
-Matej
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 7:17 PM, Gerolf Seitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the following works for me:
// in your callback method
PageParameters params = new PageParameters();
params.put(page, getPageNumber());
setResponsePage(MyPage.class,
Shouldn't it be available through a public repository?
-Original Message-
From: Kai Mütz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2008 12:59 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: wicket-suckerfish
Hoover, William schrieb:
Thanks, but I was looking for a way I could
1 - 100 of 175 matches
Mail list logo
