Many people expect that is the component is not visible also the
models and the data ias not called or touched. Because there state
cant be resolved correctly.
Als security is depending on it, it can never be that some thing where
security says it is not visible/cant render that is still renders
What happens if you add the wicket namespace to the html tag?
html xmlns:wicket=http://wicket.apache.org;
Frank
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 7:33 PM, John Krasnay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've just noticed a specific problem with Wicket tags interfering with
IE6. I have a page that uses the
On Fri, 16 May 2008, nanotech wrote:
I want to know what are the different approaches that I can take in Wicket
to solve this simple problem.
Consider there are two radio buttons and they both have corresponding text
fields in front of them.
I want to enable /disable the other text fields
Isn't this is what I did?
Anyway, here's an example of what I get.
First: the Java code:
public final class TestButtonPage extends WebPage {
public TestButtonPage() {
add(new ExtendingButton(extendingButton));
Button other = new Button(behavioralButton);
other.add(new
On Fri, 16 May 2008, Ritz123 wrote:
I have a submit button on the main form and have a debug statement printed
to indicate the form was submitted. Surprisingly there is no output both on
onsubmit of the button as well as on the form, indicating neither I getting
called. I put debug statements
No the after render of a component is called after the page render to
clean up stuff.
Just as onBeforeRender is called before the page is starting to render
On 5/17/08, Eyal Golan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Isn't this is what I did?
Anyway, here's an example of what I get.
First: the Java code:
Hi!
I have subclassed PagingNavigator to delete the last and first element of
the pager. Now I need some way of setVisible( false ) on prev and next if it
is the first or last page. How can this be done.
Altso. the current page is renderered em. Is it possible to have a
current_page or
Or just copy WicketFilter into your source, and fix it there, it'll override
the default. Its a quick fix until the release comes out.
Iman
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 10:25 AM, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Or get the snapshot build from or wicketstuff maven repo
On 5/16/08, Erik van
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 09:57:13AM +0200, Frank Bille wrote:
What happens if you add the wicket namespace to the html tag?
html xmlns:wicket=http://wicket.apache.org;
Frank
I thought about that, but the page already has the declaration.
jk
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 7:33 PM, John Krasnay
I see a lot of folks recommending this, but nobody confirming this
actually helps.
Martijn
On 5/17/08, Iman Rahmatizadeh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Or just copy WicketFilter into your source, and fix it there, it'll override
the default. Its a quick fix until the release comes out.
Iman
Brill Pappin wrote:
Does that mean that under heavy load, hitting the index page for instance, I
can expect clients to block as each request is processed?
Let me guess... The answer is no? Each session will have its own
instance of the index page. Threads of other sessions (other users)
will
Jonathan Locke wrote:
... the overall design is single-threaded, meaning you should not
need to provide synchronization ... Is there some specific problem
you have run into?
No, nothing specific yet - just a general foreboding of future
problems - having been bitten, before.
Johan Compagner
Hi Blackbird,
You can create a quickstart (http://wicket.apache.org/quickstart.html).
A quickstart is the absolute minimal Wicket application. You'll need
maven 2 installed.
Regards,
Erik.
Blackbird schreef:
Hi, are there zip files of each example available at wicketstuff? Some
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 2:46 AM, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Many people expect that is the component is not visible also the
models and the data ias not called or touched. Because there state
cant be resolved correctly.
Still seems a little odd to me. We're adding a component,
As far as the em, just call
setAfterDisabledLink(final String afterDisabledLink)
and
setBeforeDisabledLink(final String beforeDisabledLink)
to override the markup for a disabled link.
Do it like this inside your overridden PagingNavigator:
new PagingNavigator(null, null) {
Looking at the super.newPagingNavigationLink implementation, you could
actually do this to address the handling first / last pages differently:
new PagingNavigator(null, null) {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
@Override
protected Link
The workaround definitely catches some erroneous situations.
Nevertheless, it is a workaround (does not solve the root problem).
2008/5/17 Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I see a lot of folks recommending this, but nobody confirming this
actually helps.
Martijn
On 5/17/08, Iman
Hi!
I just upgraded from 1.3.1 to 1.4-m1 and I received the strangest of errors.
Has anyone had the same experience below? This occurs only with the
ternary operator, probably because both elements get initialized at
runtime:
public class AnyPage extends WebPage {
public AnyPage() {
// I
Hi!
Again, from ugrading 1.3.1 - 1.4-m1; I agree with another thread that
the mode object contents should be allowed to change (the
implementation survives both situations):
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/wicket-dev/200704.mbox/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
There is a setter anyways:
Hi!
There is a fixed version of the SqlDateConverter in the trunk,
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-735 This fix appars to be
only in 1.3.0-beta4.
Is there a reason why this has not been included in the latest builds?
**
Martin
Ok. Now I know, it still has a bug ;)
2008-05-17 17:33:35,034 93204 [btpool0-8] ERROR RequestCycle -
java.util.Date cannot be cast to java.sql.Date
java.lang.ClassCastException: java.util.Date cannot be cast to java.sql.Date
at
It is not a workaround!
The wicketfilter fix is a real fix for that situation. There is no
root cause or real cause that i need to fix, at least not that i know
of
On 5/17/08, Martin Makundi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The workaround definitely catches some erroneous situations.
Nevertheless, it
Let me see if i understand you correct.
If a user logs in to your site and then navigates away to a site/page
not handled by your domain without logging off and thus keeping the
session on the server.
And then after a little while comes back to your domain (maybe he
types the url again in the
Ok. I meant the WicketServlet fix. Haven't seen the wicketFilter fix.
**
Martin
2008/5/17 Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
It is not a workaround!
The wicketfilter fix is a real fix for that situation. There is no
root cause or real cause that i need to fix, at least not that i know
of
I think everybody is missing the point that listview was intended to
refresh itself entirely (all the items) on each render not just after
a hide/show cycle.
The reason for this is that you always want an up-to-date list. If you
don't want this this behavior you can use setReuseItems(true);
Or am
thanks timo.
Timo Rantalaiho wrote:
On Fri, 16 May 2008, nanotech wrote:
I want to know what are the different approaches that I can take in
Wicket
to solve this simple problem.
Consider there are two radio buttons and they both have corresponding
text
fields in front of them.
I
I didn't understand this post either... maybe he's talking about automatic
sign in with cookies?
Mr Mean wrote:
Let me see if i understand you correct.
If a user logs in to your site and then navigates away to a site/page
not handled by your domain without logging off and thus keeping
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 5:28 AM, Kirk Israel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 2:46 AM, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Many people expect that is the component is not visible also the
models and the data ias not called or touched. Because there state
cant be resolved
Hello,
you are right, Application.getHomePage() is not the user home.
every user has a user home page. When user types the URL
e.g. simpleurl.com, then he will see getHomePage(). If he logs in
to his account, then he gets redirected to his user home.
I only want that, if a user session is still
why is this such a huge discussion? wicket works on markup level - it
is a markup generator, so of course visible means whether or not
something is visible in the markup.
you are free to add whatever it is you want for css/javascript/etc,
but it will not be part of core. we give you enough
Then I don't really know. Perhaps file a bug report with Microsoft ;-)
Frank
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 12:47 PM, John Krasnay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 09:57:13AM +0200, Frank Bille wrote:
What happens if you add the wicket namespace to the html tag?
html
I do have component filtered feedback panel and it does display the errors.
But I guess I will put no filter feedback panel and see if that is the case.
Timo Rantalaiho wrote:
On Fri, 16 May 2008, Ritz123 wrote:
I have a submit button on the main form and have a debug statement
printed
But that is simple,just check in your real/default home page if the
user is logged in. So yes throw a redirect exception to his homepage
On 5/17/08, greeklinux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
you are right, Application.getHomePage() is not the user home.
every user has a user home page. When
You don't need to convince me :)
It even saves time between the designers and the programmers...
My only complaint so far is that it hides a bit to much of the basic http
stack which makes a bit harder to understand (for an old fart like me
anyway) but I'm not experienced enough with it yet to
I didn't know people were even following it :)
I can tell you now that I only *wish* we had used something like Wicket for
LobbyThem... Ruby on Rails was the biggest mistake we made as I can attest
to 8 months after the event. In fact I think we'd be a lot further along now
if we had used Wicket
I was trying to think of a use-case for that problem... Do you have a
specific use-case or is that just a potential issue you can think of?
-Original Message-
From: Michael Allan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 9:00 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re:
I don't see what the problem is... If getHomePage detects that the user is
already authenticated, why can't you simply issue a redirect to user_home?
- Brill
-Original Message-
From: greeklinux [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, May 17, 2008 2:02 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
37 matches
Mail list logo
