Hi,
I have problems with deploying wicket (wicket-1.4m1) application on WebLogic
9.2 server cluster (2 nodes).
Application use spring 2.5.5 for service layer and is configured:
web.xml:
distributable/
filter
filter-namewicket.call-centre/filter-name
Ok, I'll use the onBeforeRender() method. I just found the corresponding
section in Wicket in Action. Thank you.
Jonas
- Original Message -
From: Jeremy Thomerson
[mailto:jer...@wickettraining.com]
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Sent: Wed, 14
Jan 2009 20:36:22 +0100
Subject: Re: Where to
Thanks, I'll go for the suggested JS.Is there any documentation of the Wicket
JavaScript library available somewhere?
However, wouldn't be replacing borders (i.e. keeping parts of the hierarchy)
be a nice feature? I'd add a ticket if you agree.
Regards, Stefan
igor.vaynberg wrote:
the way
wasn't this someone martijn?
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 8:55 PM, Martijn Dashorst
martijn.dasho...@gmail.com wrote:
For perusing the maven repository, one should contact the guys from
nexus. They have an api for reading/indexing the repository. Don't
crawl the repository-that will surely get you
Jeremy,
I used to do some business logic in the overriden isVisible() method too but
changed that and used setVisible in onBeforeRender. Erik summed that issue
up in his presentation on
http://www.grons.nl/~erik/pub/20081112%20Effective%20Wicket.pdf (4MB) -
slide 100 is the one containing the
I don't agree with Erik that one shouldn't override isVisible. I
haven't seen problems with it in my 4 years of Wicket development. The
problem with these types of rules is that they tend to be taken at
face value without even thinking about it. Having to maintain the
state of the visible flag
Yepp, I also didn't have problems with it as - you're right - I took it at
face value without thinking about it too much. I thought to avoid problems
when the traffic of our apps grows and/or explodes I'll do it the save way
:-) wasn't much effort to change the stuff anyway.
But now I'd be
thanks, UPBrandon
I tried your code, for csv,
public class CsvRequestTarget extends ByteDataRequestTarget {
public CsvRequestTarget(byte[] data, String fileName) {
super(text/plain, data, fileName+.csv);
}
}
but it can not work with IE ａｎｄ ｆｆ．
In the thread Where to process PageParameters I was requested to
explain why I think you should not override isVisible, but rather should
call setVisible in onBeforeRender (slide 100 in my presentation
http://www.grons.nl/~erik/pub/20081112%20Effective%20Wicket.pdf).
There are 2 reasons, but
-1- isVisible is called a lot. It is easily called ten times within 1
request
If you need to optimize, you can use lazy initialization of a boolean
variable here and reset it in onBeforeRender?
-2- isVisible can make your model be reloaded multiple times within 1
request
If you need to
There are three objects on the page which have injected properties.
The first is an abstract superclass of all pages in the project, I have
checked on other pages and there is no issue with the back button here so I
don't think its the issue but here's the code.
public class AbstractMain
I have a problem in inserting/adding nodes dynamically to tree.
When i inserted/added a node on click, the plus icon appears but it is not
expanded, that is it is not showing the child node i have tried tree.update
but not worked.
My Code
protected void
I overwrote as well isVisible() and find this approach logical. I would have
liked to overwrite setVisible() as well and throw a
NotSupportedException to show clearly that setVisible might not work any
longer as exspected for my component.
But setVisible() is final, so I could not overwrite it.
Michael,
I answered on another thread.
Regards,
Erik.
Michael Sparer wrote:
Yepp, I also didn't have problems with it as - you're right - I took it at
face value without thinking about it too much. I thought to avoid problems
when the traffic of our apps grows and/or explodes I'll
what about call target.addComponent(this);
?
you have updated tree but you didn't tell wicket to update this component
visually...
V.
2009/1/15 PSkarthic kart...@touchpointindia.com
I have a problem in inserting/adding nodes dynamically to tree.
When i inserted/added a node on click, the
Thanks for your reply
i have been waiting for long time
target.addComponent(this); also does not solved my problem.
if i click a node the child is created under the node but doesn't expanded
but when i click it second time then it expands but with two child.
--
View this message in context:
We had a last minute booking on this weekend's jWeekend 2 day Apache Wicket
training course (17-18 Jan, London). If you or someone you know would like
to attend at such short notice use voucher JW7062009JAN1725% (remove
quotes) to book with 25% discount. There are several places available.
It's
Is there anybody to solve this.
I got Stuck here
:working:
I have a problem in inserting/adding nodes dynamically to tree.
When i inserted/added a node on click, the plus icon appears but it is not
expanded, that is it is not showing the child node i have tried tree.update
but not worked.
My
Hello,
I wrote a simple plugin to use wicket with javarebel and spring
http://code.google.com/p/javarebel-wicket-plugin/
[]'s
Falcão
Theres also Wicketopia, http://wicketopia.sourceforge.net/
But I think it's a little more incomplete than WWB, but theres couple of
archetypes. And its easy to work with..
2009/1/14 Tauren Mills tau...@tauren.com
Thanks for the responses to my OT message,
Daniel -- Thanks for your comments
Yes, you should use the nexus index for the repository
http://nexus.sonatype.org/
The indexer api is pretty straight forward:
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/M2ECLIPSE/Nexus+Indexer#NexusIndexer-NexusIndexerAPIExample
you could search for artifacts with the appropriate metadata, or search
Looks like this is causing problems in SerializedPagesCache
static final Page NO_PAGE = new Page()
{
};
I wonder why the class is not loaded when the other node is initialized.
Please create a JIRA issue.
in the meanwhile, you can try load Class.forName(..) the
Brix
Jackrabbit
Our application will need some heavy duty CMS features, and
this project looks powerful enough to do the job. Jackrabbit
is used by Brix to store content.
Alternatively, you could try Hippo CMS7. It's also built with Wicket on
top of a JCR repository, but with some
Hi Guys
Have any of you worked with wicket and outputting voice markup?
Im just wanting to hear experiences and ideas etc..
Ps, it's no secret that I've switched from Jayway to Netdesign (nortel
unit)..
regards Nino
-
To
While experimenting with MarkupFilters, I noticed that IBehaviors
added to ComponentTag using ComponentTag#addBehavior(IBehavior behavior)
are never detached. Is that a bug, or just not possible to do?
As far as I can see you don't have ComponentTags available anymore
when Components are
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 12:53 AM, Stefan Fußenegger
stefan_fusseneg...@gmx.at wrote:
Thanks, I'll go for the suggested JS.Is there any documentation of the Wicket
JavaScript library available somewhere?
there is no wicket js library, what i gave you was pseudocode.
However, wouldn't be
behaviors added to componenttag are in turn added to components, so
they are detached and managed by components no the componenttag they
are added to.
-igor
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 8:16 AM, Jonas barney...@gmail.com wrote:
While experimenting with MarkupFilters, I noticed that IBehaviors
added
cool. this definitely looks like the right approach to me (assuming it
indexes most of the big repos)
jon
Rodolfo Hansen wrote:
Yes, you should use the nexus index for the repository
http://nexus.sonatype.org/
The indexer api is pretty straight forward:
btw, maybe this maven artifact searching thing should be integrated somehow
with an existing wicket search engine?
http://www.google.com/coop/cse?cx=00079654818618231%3Aenjwek-gxxg
is that possible with google custom searches alastair?
Jonathan Locke wrote:
cool. this definitely
Good {morning|day|evening}!
I have a Model with String field code and list of objects ListT
where t.getCode() must be returned to Model.
Several hours I try to make it strict typed with Wicket 1.4. No success :(
Please, help me!
if you have listt you must have imodelt that is how the ddc works.
you can either create a model that translates string-t or one that
translates listt - liststring
-igor
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 8:52 AM, Anton Veretennikov
anton.veretenni...@gmail.com wrote:
Good {morning|day|evening}!
I have
Hi,
I'm a beginner about Wicket and the main issue which I have is JavaScript
and Wicket integration. My question is is it possible to pass JavaScript
variable value to Wicket as Wicket link parameter?
Here are some part of code which I have:
// Set link on data cell
Link callUpdateWindow =
I knew it was pseudo code. With JS library I meant the stuff contained in
wicket-ajax.js, wicket-event.js, wicket-ajax-debug.js.
with replacing border, you meant the server-side concept of a Border, right?
I was talking more of a html related concept (bad description, sorry), where
a border is
The main difficulty in implementing DropDownChoiceT,V is translation
of values?
On 1/15/09, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com wrote:
if you have listt you must have imodelt that is how the ddc works.
you can either create a model that translates string-t or one that
translates listt -
Hi all,
I have a situation whereby certain conditions mean I need to skip an
item that is being rendered in a ListView.
ie inside the populateItem() method I do some processing and if that
item fails, it shouldn't be rendered so I'd like to skip to the next
item.
I know I *could* process
yep
-igor
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 9:12 AM, Anton Veretennikov
anton.veretenni...@gmail.com wrote:
The main difficulty in implementing DropDownChoiceT,V is translation
of values?
On 1/15/09, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com wrote:
if you have listt you must have imodelt that is how the
Sounds like bad design that's going to give you headaches later...
nevertheless, did you try setting the listItem.setVisible(false)?
**
Martin
2009/1/15 Steve Swinsburg s.swinsb...@lancaster.ac.uk:
Hi all,
I have a situation whereby certain conditions mean I need to skip an item
that is
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 9:11 AM, Stefan Fußenegger
stefan_fusseneg...@gmx.at wrote:
I knew it was pseudo code. With JS library I meant the stuff contained in
wicket-ajax.js, wicket-event.js, wicket-ajax-debug.js.
those are for wicket's internal use. dont touch :)
with replacing border, you
We have done exact that -- a lot. Driving isVisible() from the state
of the model is very clean, but the performance is potentially awful.
I have wondered whether this should be the default implementation for
Component.isVisible().
Is IVisitor.beforeRender() an appropriate place in the rendering
Even if they are for wicket's internal use, documentation might be
valuable, especially for (wicketstuff) developers who go deeper then regular
users. Furthermore, having some basic JS utilities (with documented public
API) coming with Wicket would make using Wicket even more fun. I'd bet that
a
thats exactly the point. we do not maintain api compatibility of the
js code, not even between minor versions, so you should not use them
or depend on them.
-igor
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 10:05 AM, Stefan Fußenegger
stefan_fusseneg...@gmx.at wrote:
Even if they are for wicket's internal use,
I would be careful not to throw the baby out with the bath water here. The
design decision you're making is push versus pull and implementing isVisible
is often going to be a better design decision because it may be more clear
that visibility state stays consistent for a given problem. If the
Is there a reason why the default behavior is not to cache the result
of isVisible()? Are there cases where the result of isVisible() is
expected to change over the course of rendering?
Would a JIRA w/ code be welcome, or is the current behavior required?
Scott
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 10:23
My suggestions was to actually maintain a minimal JS api in the future. I
don't believe that the very basic utility functions are going to change
between minor versions. So it might be worth thinking about making this API
official. The users would definitely benefit from it - and nobody would
not sure. it /ought/ to make sense to cache during the render cycle. but i
have the eerie sense that this came up before, so maybe there's some reason
why it can't be cached? (although even if there are some odd cases where it
can't be, it seems like you could make a workaround for those cases
Hi everybody,
I'm new on wicket and ajax, and now I'm having problems mixing
both. In my page I have some simple DropDownChoice and not related to them
but to a button I have a Modal Window.
The problem is, testing my page on IE6, when I scroll the page
down the dropdown
Hi all,
Sorry to ask such newbie question, but how could I submit a
request and while the server process it, which will be send a response to
the same page, the application friendly locks/freezes the whole page (with
a load/processing animated gif) so the user could not change anything
I haven't tried that (yet) but once I do the checks I need it to stop
rendering that item. So the rest of the stuff tahts meant to be
rendered never gets processed.
Nevermind I will do the checks before the data even reaches the
LoadableDetachableModel feeding it.
cheers.
On
See:
*
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/wicket-users/200901.mbox/%3c303141550901100017w3480b326vd1cf21e3efa18...@mail.gmail.com%3e
*
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/generic-busy-indicator-for-both-ajax-and-non-ajax-submits.html
**
Martin
2009/1/15 alex.bo...@souzacruz.com.br:
Hi all,
Well... I would not build in the cache because different components
could interact in a way that if someone prematurely calls the
isVisible method, it freezes in the wrong state. It is known, that the
isVisible is called multiple times for various reasons.
**
Martin
2009/1/15 Jonathan Locke
well yes, it might break existing behavior, that's why i suggested having a
workaround for that. although i would think that well-designed isVisible
methods shouldn't generally have this problem.
you could always work it the other way and have no caching by default but
allow people who know
you could always work it the other way and have no caching by default but
allow people who know what they're doing to enable it for an application
with something like
IRequestCycleSettings#setCacheComponentVisibility(boolean).
This sounds more robust, so long as it can be controlled on a
yeah, for full flexibility, you might just link a method in Component to a
default in IRequestCycleSettings:
boolean getCacheComponentVisibility() { return
getApplication().getRequestCycleSettings().getCacheComponentVisibility(); }
then you can set a default and override for any individual
i think the next step is to see what the core team thinks about this. filing
a ticket couldn't hurt.
Jonathan Locke wrote:
yeah, for full flexibility, you might just link a method in Component to a
default in IRequestCycleSettings:
boolean getCacheComponentVisibility() { return
Do you mean that you want to call back to Wicket from client-side JS? If
so, see any of the AbstractAjaxBehavior implementations - you'll see how
they generate a callback to server-side.
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 11:04 AM, Sniffer cajic_aleksan...@yahoo.comwrote:
Hi,
I'm a beginner about
ListItem.item.setVisibilityAllowed(false) - should work for you.
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 1:16 PM, Stephen Swinsburg
s.swinsb...@lancaster.ac.uk wrote:
I haven't tried that (yet) but once I do the checks I need it to stop
rendering that item. So the rest of the stuff tahts meant to be
Hi Pierre,
I actually thought they were in English, but I now see that the first
few are in Dutch. Not sure why I did that. They are not that important,
so just read on...
Regards,
Erik.
Pierre Goupil wrote:
Good evening,
I'm sorry to bug you, but I'be read the presentation you're
What is strange is that isvisible is being checked during detach (I
seriously doubt that). That shouldn't be happening: *all* components
should be detached regardless of their visibility.
Martijn
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 9:29 PM, Jonathan Locke
jonathan.lo...@gmail.com wrote:
i think the next
Indeed. If this would no longer be the case, overriding isVisible would
be no problem (though caching would be nice).
Regards,
Erik.
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
What is strange is that isvisible is being checked during detach (I
seriously doubt that). That shouldn't be happening: *all*
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 9:38 PM, Erik van Oosten e.vanoos...@grons.nl wrote:
I actually thought they were in English, but I now see that the first few
are in Dutch. Not sure why I did that. They are not that important, so just
read on...
You can probably have a good laugh at google translate
if we do this then as a reusable component developer you have to
always be aware of this default and code with it in mind because it is
outside your control yet impacts the behaviors of components. -1 from
me.
-igor
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 12:25 PM, Jonathan Locke
jonathan.lo...@gmail.com wrote:
Perhaps it would be more natural to use RepeatingView (or
RefreshingView) in such cases.
Regards,
Erik.
Steve Swinsburg wrote:
Hi all,
I have a situation whereby certain conditions mean I need to skip an
item that is being rendered in a ListView.
ie inside the populateItem() method I do
this is a really good point. i think i'm -1 on the idea too unless there's a
good proposal for how to avoid that problem.
igor.vaynberg wrote:
if we do this then as a reusable component developer you have to
always be aware of this default and code with it in mind because it is
outside
Hi,
I am trying to display a lucene document as a row in the datatable.
Here is how I am defining my column:
PropertyColumn col = new PropertyColumn(new Model(Name), get('NAME'),
get('NAME'));
The get('NAME') is a call to the document.get(String fieldName) method on the
lucene document.
I
Hi there!
There are some things in Wicket I am missing and I think they could improve the
framework a lot.
But just some small background first:
In my opinion the most important things in a web application are:
- as few lines of code as possible, as many as really necessary
- separation
Hi,
I'm learning Jasper to create/display a PDF when a link is clicked and the
template code I have looks like:
ServletOutputStream servletOutputStream = response.getOutputStream();
InputStream reportStream =
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 1:44 PM, Tobias Marx superoverdr...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi there!
There are some things in Wicket I am missing and I think they could improve
the framework a lot.
But just some small background first:
In my opinion the most important things in a web application are:
Hi,
1) and 2) are already implemented, or something very close exists. 3)
may be a good improvement, maybe with a new wicket tag
(wicket:component type=com.me.MyCustomComp /). let's see what think
core developpers
1) you have various way of altering tags and attributes:
attributemodifiers,
requestcycle.get().getresponse().getoutputstream()
-igor
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 1:54 PM, novotny novo...@gridsphere.org wrote:
Hi,
I'm learning Jasper to create/display a PDF when a link is clicked and the
template code I have looks like:
ServletOutputStream servletOutputStream =
Hi,
look at RequestCycle#setRequestTarget and ResourceStreamRequestTarget
novotny wrote:
Hi,
I'm learning Jasper to create/display a PDF when a link is clicked and the
template code I have looks like:
ServletOutputStream servletOutputStream = response.getOutputStream();
InputStream
I am still having troubles adding the wicketstuff-scriptaculous dependency,
even though I had no trouble adding wicketstuff-minis. After looking at
http://wicketstuff.org/maven/repository/org/wicketstuff/wicketstuff-scriptaculous/1.4-SNAPSHOT/,
I noticed that filenames contain a timestamp.
A short test didn't uncover any calls to isVisible during detach phase
(1.4). Might need more extensive tests though...
Martijn
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 10:12 PM, Jonathan Locke
jonathan.lo...@gmail.com wrote:
this is a really good point. i think i'm -1 on the idea too unless there's a
good
Sorry I mentioned the AJAX but o didn't tell exactly what is the relation
with the problem The same page with no AJAX function the problem do
not occur.
thank you
01/15/2009 04:59 PM
alex.bo...@souzacruz.com.br
Please respond to
users@wicket.apache.org
To
well, one simple design that would avoid the reuse problem is:
Boolean Component#isCachedVisible() { return null; }
then override to use visibility caching and return true or false.
if you don't override you get the current functionality.
of course you need two more bits in Component to
My idea what an inversion of that one:
Add a method to Component, such as isVisibleInternal() [no I don't
love the name] that would cache the results of isVisible(). Then all
code that currently calls isVisible() would be changed to call
isVisibleInternal() instead. Someone who really wanted
I'm building an app that will have *lots* of panels that all follow a very
similar pattern:
They have a form and a static view whose visibility gets toggled when when
you click edit/cancel|save|delete
They display a warning if their model is empty
They pop up a warning when you delete them
They
wicket-spring also requires the wicket-ioc binaries on your classpath -
sounds like you're missing that?
rjilani wrote:
Hi: I am using the following code from wicket wiki to add a
Springcomponent injector to addComponentInstantiationListener to hook
spring application context, but the
As I understand it, you have a generic container component, which may
contain different subpanels. You do know that Panels can actually have their
own markup and also markup inheritance (?), so you'd end up with three
classes: the main panel (container) and you add an instance of (sub)classes
2
Are there any wicket/eclipse/maven/m2eclipse users out there? I'm
trying to get my development environment working properly and need
your help.
Up until now, I've been developing WIcket applications in Eclipse and
have not been using maven. As long as my web.xml is set to
development rather
Theres also Wicketopia, http://wicketopia.sourceforge.net/
Nino -- Good to know, I will check it out.
Alternatively, you could try Hippo CMS7. It's also built with Wicket on
top of a JCR repository, but with some extensions that you might like.
(workflow, authorization, virtual trees based
No that is pretty much what I meant. The composition solution would involve
and abstract superclass and then for each kind of widget a fairly trivial
implementation of the superclass, a static panel, and a dynamic panel. It's
just that all that class proliferation gives me a nasty feeling and
by class proliferation you mean having to extend a base class?
-igor
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 3:40 PM, Loren Cole loren.c...@gmail.com wrote:
No that is pretty much what I meant. The composition solution would involve
and abstract superclass and then for each kind of widget a fairly trivial
Francisco,
Thanks for your 2c.
i personally think hibernate is... the least worse we've got for orms.
otherwise pretty standard stack that should work fine and has a huge
userbase. you may also want to check out google guice
I'm pretty sure I'll go with hibernate because of my experience
iirc you have to turn off eclipse's filtering of html files (which is
turned off default because of javadoc html which usually doesn't want
to be packaged inside your war/jar)
Martijn
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 12:31 AM, Tauren Mills tau...@tauren.com wrote:
Are there any
Some time ago, I wrote the following code to generate a javascript resource
with values that are unique to each user. I would have sworn that it
worked, and that it would return a different value depending on which user
was logged in. However, I've just found that it is now always returning the
Martijn,
Thanks. But any clue how or where I do that? I've been poking around
the preferences in eclipse and haven't found it.
Tauren
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 3:51 PM, Martijn Dashorst
martijn.dasho...@gmail.com wrote:
iirc you have to turn off eclipse's filtering of html files (which is
open the preferences window
in the search box type filter
this will show you java/compiler/building panel with
FilteredREsources: textbox, remove *.html
-igor
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 4:03 PM, Tauren Mills tau...@tauren.com wrote:
Martijn,
Thanks. But any clue how or where I do that? I've
Thanks Igor, but I already looked there and the only thing listed in
filtered resources is *.launch.
Any other ideas?
Tauren
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 4:05 PM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com wrote:
open the preferences window
in the search box type filter
this will show you
sounds like your browser is caching it.
try this:
hit the page
check the value
empty browser cache
refresh the page
see if the value changed...
other then that i hope you know that storing a password in cleartext
inside a js file might not be the best idea :)
-igor
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at
I have been searching, but all the examples that I come across use a
standalone page for editing an object.
For example, clicking this link will take the user to a PersonEdit page.
add(new Link(editPerson) {
public void onClick() {
if you dont call setresponsepage() the same page is redrawn.
-igor
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 4:22 PM, Phillip Rhodes
spamsu...@rhoderunner.com wrote:
I have been searching, but all the examples that I come across use a
standalone page for editing an object.
For example, clicking this link will
no, no, you're on the right track with composition. more simpler classes is
the ideal because it breaks the problem down. if you start to feel like you
have too many classes, you probably need to grow (or maybe refactor) your
package hierarchy.
Loren Cole wrote:
No that is pretty much what
sure, that's the clean way to do it, but it comes at the expense of possibly
breaking user code by surprise.
i'm not sure how big of a deal this is. i've heard people talk about it, but
i'd be interested in some examples of how performance of this method has
been a problem for people. i've
oh i suppose you also need to reset the value in onBeforeRender(). it's a
small pain, but how often does this really become a quantifiable problem and
not just a worry?
Jonathan Locke wrote:
sure, that's the clean way to do it, but it comes at the expense of
possibly breaking user code
We have implemented this, perhaps a dozen times or more across our
application. For example, there are several payment options whose
relevance is determined by whether the customer owes any money on
their purchase (e.g. as opposed to using a gift card). These total
the order and determine
If you have properly coded all of your models and subcomponents on the page,
you should be able to do something like:
add(new Link(editPerson, theModelOfThePersonThisLinkWouldEdit) {
public void onClick() {
// replace the page's model with the model given to this link
What I would probably do is write a LucenePropertyColumn that extends
AbstractColumn.
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 4:14 PM, Phillip Rhodes
spamsu...@rhoderunner.com wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to display a lucene document as a row in the datatable.
Here is how I am defining my column:
PropertyColumn
Hi,
Ok I found in wicketstuff, a JRPdfResource class that does the jasper to
pdf conversion for me
and I added code to do this:
InputStream is = getClass().getResourceAsStream(/test.jasper);
JRResource pdfResource = new JRPdfResource(is);
pdfResource.setReportParameters(new
Hello all wicket users!
Does anybody know why id is added to component, not to list of children, like:
add(someId, childComponent);
Thank you very much.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For
Because it is imperative in many ways that the component knows it's own ID.
Look through the code to see how many times it uses it's ID.
Hope this helps.
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 9:40 PM, Anton Veretennikov
anton.veretenni...@gmail.com wrote:
1 - 100 of 111 matches
Mail list logo
