Hi Jeremy,
Nice post! I'll think I'll start using that approach myself more
frequently.
Best,
Ernesto
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 9:19 PM, Jeremy Thomerson
jer...@wickettraining.comwrote:
Ernesto's got you on the right track. I'd recommend taking it a step
further like described here:
I suggest setting up an ESB with a UppercaseService that is available
through EJB/SOAP/JAX-RS and JSON. UppercaseModel could then access
that UppercaseService to make the value uppercase.
Martijn
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 12:50 AM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com wrote:
you can create a
Dear all,
I am using AjaxEditableLabel, with the following codes,
it is ok to show the description, but when i clicked it, error happened.
onEdit ... is on the console , so it already call onEdit() method,
how to implement the method? how to solve the question?
thanks a lot.
LOL! That sounds scalable!
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
I suggest setting up an ESB with a UppercaseService that is available
through EJB/SOAP/JAX-RS and JSON. UppercaseModel could then access
that UppercaseService to make the value uppercase.
Martijn
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 12:50 AM, Igor
This is of huge interest for the Wicket community: HippoCMS is a large
supporter and user of Apache open source software in general, and
Wicket in particular.
HippoCMS uses Wicket in large parts of their infrastructure and I am
excited to hear that Wicket will be at the basis for the Dutch
Martijn,
Is there not already an EasyUpperCaseRUs.com web service you can subscribe
to for unlimited conversions at an annual fee of under 30,000USD (or
100USD/conversion) who also have a 5 free conversions trial subscription?
Ether way, I would suggest this be done at conversion time so
I have a form component to select items and would like to add lower
and upper constraints on the number of items that need to be set by
the user. I added setMin() and setMax() methods and would like to
override setRequired() to call setMin(1). However,
FormComponent.setRequired is final.
sorry
the reason for the error is AjaxEditableLabel descriptionEditableLabel = new
AjaxEditableChoiceLabel(description, new PropertyModel(fileObj,
description))
it should be
AjaxEditableLabel descriptionEditableLabel = new
AjaxEditableLabel(description, new PropertyModel(fileObj, description))
it has nothing to do with threading or concurent modification
Its really a simple test just run this:
import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.Collection;
import java.util.Comparator;
import java.util.HashSet;
import java.util.Iterator;
import java.util.TreeSet;
public class Test
{
goed nieuws!
this is a great step forward for wicket, a fact that reveals its
quality and maturity (without having to pass through a JSR, btw).
congratulations to the hippo team!
francisco
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 11:08 AM, jWeekend jweekend_for...@cabouge.com wrote:
Martijn,
This really is
Johan,
I can't have a thorough look at this until later, but the first thing I
noticed is that MyObject does not have equals and hashCode defined, yet you
are putting instances of it into hashed collections.
Even if that isn't causing the main issue you are demonstrating, you may
witness
Yes i know that that COULD help but not really for all the situations.
The thing is that i give the TreeSet a Comparator that defines the order and
equal of the objects
And i expect that that will be used when i do:
treeset.removeAll(Collection)
So then it is the same thing as i do:
Iterator
-1 from me. I prefer the wildcards. It let's the client code be more
flexible
On Mar 5, 2009 1:20 AM, Martijn Reuvers martijn.reuv...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 for me too.
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 9:39 PM, Martijn Dashorst martijn.dasho...@gmail.com
wrote: Though I hav...
Hi. Im having a problem with the modalwindow again. It's probably my code so
I'll try to explain what I doing.
I have a Panel that I want to reuse. It's a panel with a form where you can
update som data. Because it will be used by different pages with Ajax
Behavior I want a to add
a callback
Hello Thomas,
org.apache.wicket.markup.MarkupException: Expected close tag for
wicket:link
[markup = file:/C:/Programme/Apache Software
Foundation/geronimo-2.1.2/repository/default/test/app.war/WEB-INF/classes/com/path/app/web/pages/base/HomePage.html
then the html for the page HomePage.html is
I've checked through the html and couldn't find anything unusual.
I'm making calls to wicket links in the html:
html # Customer /html
{how do we add html to a post?}
in the java:
add(new BookmarkablePageLink(PageLink, CustomerPage.class));
The html for HomePage.html exists between
I've tried search the forum and googled but no answer so I'll give it a try.
A while ago we needed to implement a new language to our wicket site. We
changed from .properties to .xml to get this to work.
The problem is that some things has stopped working. Consider the following
We have a
Thanks, Igor; this worked perfectly.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/How-can-I-injecting-a-Springbean-into-a-custom-session.-tp22340379p22350445.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
If I change every MyObject in a String, everything is fine. Perhaps the
MyObject is not obeying the necessary contracts?
See adjusted code below:
import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.Collection;
import java.util.Comparator;
import java.util.HashSet;
import java.util.Iterator;
import
You are missing the point. With a string it will work, because the
elements will actually be the same string objects, so the String.equals
and the overridden compare method will give the same results in the
example. Johan's point is that while set1.removeAll() is called, it is
not the compare
Sorry, I have to correct myself. According to the API-docs, the compare
method in a TreeSet must be consistent with equals. In Johan's example
it is not.
On Thu, 05 Mar 2009 13:36 +0100, Pointbreak
pointbreak+wicketst...@ml1.net wrote:
You are missing the point. With a string it will work,
yes thats my point
The TreeSet doesnt use hash or equals
you define that with the comparator what it should do
If you look at my last reply where i do define hash and equals then it also
doesnt work.
Problem is that i did encounter this in an eclipse plugin we use
Sometimes it worked
Have a page that extends another page that in turn extends
org.apache.wicket.markup.html.WebPage. Have added a form that extends
org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.Form to this page. In this form, I have
a org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.Button
Button searchButton = new Button(searchButton){
that is then the wrong spec that i talk about
That is completely stupid
With a comparator you just OVERRIDE the equals, thats the whole point!
johan
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 13:44, Pointbreak
pointbreak+wicketst...@ml1.netpointbreak%2bwicketst...@ml1.net
wrote:
Sorry, I have to correct
For example.
You want a tree set with a case insensitive comparator.. Because you want to
order case insensitive..
That breaks the equals contract.
So that note in the doc just makes the TreeSet completely worthless
johan
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 13:46, Johan Compagner jcompag...@gmail.com
It might have something to do with which Page the AjaxRequestTarget belongs
to. The AjaxRequestTarget from the Ajaxbutton in the CallBackPanel belong to
ModalContentPage. Not the Page that Uses the ModalWindow. AnyOne have a
explanation?
Jens
--
View this message in context:
Yes it's stupid. If it was the only stupid thing sun did in the java
specs, i might have understood why it is one of the most populair
languages around...
On Thu, 05 Mar 2009 13:46 +0100, Johan Compagner
jcompag...@gmail.com wrote:
that is then the wrong spec that i talk about
That is
It is in the javadoc for Comparator
Caution should be exercised when using a comparator capable of imposing an
ordering inconsistent with equals to order a sorted set (or sorted map).
Suppose a sorted set (or sorted map) with an explicit comparator c is used
with elements (or keys) drawn from a
the page reloading itself is expected behaviour as the form gets submitted,
the onSubmit() method should however be called. if you provided us some more
code (and the wicket version you're using)?
regards,
Michael
Edwin Ansicodd wrote:
Have a page that extends another page that in turn
yes i know but the TreeSet does also say that in the javadoc that it is an
exception because of the Comparator
And they could really just make it a black box. The only things they just
need to fix then is the removeAll and retainAll methods
Why the removeAll iterates by default over itself and
I'm using Wicket 1.3.0
Michael Sparer wrote:
the page reloading itself is expected behaviour as the form gets
submitted, the onSubmit() method should however be called. if you provided
us some more code (and the wicket version you're using)?
regards,
Michael
--
View this message
Is there an easy way to do it? Output would be:
select
optionEnabled item/option
option disabled=disabledDisabled item/option
...
/select
Adriano
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For
hmm, that is weird indeed
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 2:05 PM, Johan Compagner jcompag...@gmail.comwrote:
yes i know but the TreeSet does also say that in the javadoc that it is an
exception because of the Comparator
And they could really just make it a black box. The only things they just
need
alright, then show us more code :-) ... and I'd recommend upgrading to 1.3.5
anyway ...
Edwin Ansicodd wrote:
I'm using Wicket 1.3.0
Michael Sparer wrote:
the page reloading itself is expected behaviour as the form gets
submitted, the onSubmit() method should however be called. if
Would you have time to implement this?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1785
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/wicket-commits/200808.mbox/%3c784112037.1218385184286.javamail.j...@brutus%3e
I was planning to do it but it hasn't been an issue for me lately.
**
Martin
2009/3/5
Some more code:
public class SearchPage extends BasePage {
private String name = ;
public SearchPage(PageParameters parameters) {
super(parameters);
// TODO Auto-generated constructor stub
init();
}
I actually think the specs in the api doc are just worded very badly.
They just mean to say that if the comparator is not consistent with
equals, the Set-contract is broken, just because that contract is based
on (and worded in terms of) equals. This may lead to odd behavior for
other code that
Edwin,
Put a feedback panel on your page - you may have validation errors.
Regards - Cemal
http://jWeekend.com jWeekend
Edwin Ansicodd wrote:
Have a page that extends another page that in turn extends
org.apache.wicket.markup.html.WebPage. Have added a form that extends
http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/search.do?process=1category=bugStatus=1%2C2%2C3%2C4%2C5%2C6%2C7%2C8%2C9%2C10%2C11subcategory=type=keyword=TreeSet+removeAll
first 1 is from 2001; not a bug thats the spec (i think that is still
wrong and if i read the javadoc a bit different for removeAll then i
Added a feedback panel to the page, but no additional information appears.
jWeekend wrote:
Edwin,
Put a feedback panel on your page - you may have validation errors.
Regards - Cemal
http://jWeekend.com jWeekend
--
View this message in context:
Adriano,
Take a look at a mini-presentation I gave at one of our London Wicket Events
sometime in last couple of years on Select and SelectOption at
http://jweekend.com/dev/ArticlesPage/ .
Regards - Cemal
http://jWeekend.com jWeekend
Adriano dos Santos Fernandes-3 wrote:
Is there an
On 05.03.2009, at 10:49, Kaspar Fischer wrote:
I have a form component to select items and would like to add lower
and upper constraints on the number of items that need to be set by
the user. I added setMin() and setMax() methods and would like to
override setRequired() to call setMin(1).
Kaspar,
+1
Regards - Cemal
http://jWeekend.com jWeekend
hbf wrote:
On 05.03.2009, at 10:49, Kaspar Fischer wrote:
I have a form component to select items and would like to add lower
and upper constraints on the number of items that need to be set by
the user. I added setMin() and
more code continued. . .
import org.apache.wicket.markup.html.WebPage;
public abstract class BasePage extends WebPage {
private CustomFeedbackPanel feedback;
public BasePage() {
super();
init();
}
private void init() {
more code continued. . .
import org.apache.wicket.markup.html.WebPage;
public abstract class BasePage extends WebPage {
private CustomFeedbackPanel feedback;
public BasePage() {
super();
init();
}
private void init() {
Yes, I love that mailing list :-)
Am 05.03.2009 um 10:26 schrieb jWeekend:
Martijn,
Is there not already an EasyUpperCaseRUs.com web service you can
subscribe
to for unlimited conversions at an annual fee of under 30,000USD (or
100USD/conversion) who also have a 5 free conversions trial
Hi all
This is my situation:
i've a ResourceLink based on a JasperReport Resource(DynamicWebResource )
and all is ok until i use http.
But if the web server uses https IE can't download the file.
i searched in the web but i 've found only an e-mail with similar problem (
Does it work if you set your Resource setCacheable(true)?
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 3:21 PM, Luca Provenzani eufor...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all
This is my situation:
i've a ResourceLink based on a JasperReport Resource(DynamicWebResource )
and all is ok until i use http.
But if the web server
When you ask the hashset if it contains that object (checking whether or not
to remove) it will say that it doesn't contain it because it's not the same
object (you didn't override equals and hashCode). That's the whole issue
here.
On Mar 5, 2009 8:06 AM, Johan Compagner jcompag...@gmail.com
On 05.03.2009, at 15:11, jWeekend wrote:
Kaspar,
+1
:-) Thanks for the feedback. Good to know I'm on the right track.
Kaspar
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
No that isnt the issue here
Because i dont ask in my point of view anything of the hashset!
Why would this result in something asking the hashset (asking like that it
has to use the hash or equals things on things that are in the TreeSet)?
TreeSet.removeAll(HashSet)
why?
It should just iterate
in this way it works, but how can i refresh the report when parameter is
changed?
Until now i change parameter into the onclick of the ResourceLink, but now
the resource is cached...and then the result report is ever the same..
thanks
Luca
2009/3/5 Jonas barney...@gmail.com
Does it work if
If it is the browser that caches the report, you can work around this
by adding something random to the url generated
by ResourceLink#getUrl, similar to what's done in NonCachingImage.
urlFor(IResourceListener.INTERFACE) + wicket:antiCache= +
System.currentTimeMillis()
Unfortunatly,
create a quickstart and attach it to a jira issue
-igor
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 3:52 AM, Mathias P.W Nilsson
math...@snyltarna.se wrote:
I've tried search the forum and googled but no answer so I'll give it a try.
A while ago we needed to implement a new language to our wicket site. We
i just tested your code and it worked for me. maybe there's something wrong
in the basepage? or in the markup?
Edwin Ansicodd wrote:
Some more code:
public class SearchPage extends BasePage {
private String name = ;
public SearchPage(PageParameters parameters) {
sorry i wrote a wrong thing...
the result is NOT ever the same, but is the report with the previous
parameters.
I try to explain better:
i've a form that determines the report's prameters. On ResourceLink, i added
a onmousedown AjaxFormSubmitBehavior to submit the parameter and calculate
other.
I think it is a bug in the Eclipse plugin. Thankfully, it's Eclipse and
not Sun, so this bug can be solved very fast ;)
Dave Schoorl wrote:
I do understand your point. However you are dealing with multiple
contracts and not all of them are satisfied. And sometimes contracts
are conflicting
OK it's all ok
i just move the code from the onclick to onmousedown
AjaxFormSubmitBehavior.
and now all work fine!
a big thank Jonas!
Luca
2009/3/5 Luca Provenzani eufor...@gmail.com
sorry i wrote a wrong thing...
the result is NOT ever the same, but is the report with the previous
Looking at ResourceLink#onResourceRequested, I see the resource is
delivered before
#onClick is called, so whatever you're doing in onClick is too late to
have any influence
on the report generation.
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 4:52 PM, Luca Provenzani eufor...@gmail.com wrote:
sorry i wrote a wrong
using conversion and validation for this is wrong.
converters in wicket are meant to convert from type-string because
the web is type-agnostic. a string-string conversion is not a
conversion from wicket's point of view. yes, the code is somewhat
unclear, we are going to address this in 1.5 where
Dave, you are missing the point completely. The issue raised by Johan is
that if you call TreeSet.removeAll(otherSet), then in some cases the
comperator/equals contract of otherSet is used, in other cases the
comperator/equals contract of the treeset. Which is a bit strange, and
even by Sun
Igor,
If there was a Java type called UpperCaseString that's what the developer
would use as the underlying object and you would not have this objection.
What's the difference between a converter translating 2009-04-04 to a
java.util.Date or even to a LunchDate which always sets the time part to
I agree that it's weird that the behavior of the removeAll depends on
the size of the other collection.
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 11:11 AM, Pointbreak
pointbreak+wicketst...@ml1.net wrote:
Dave, you are missing the point completely. The issue raised by Johan is
that if you call
I've solved this same requirement on the backend (architecture was
two-layered). Wicket on the front layer had no relation to the
uppercasing.
On java.util.String there are two methods: toUpperCase() and
toUpperCase(Locale locale). I've used the parametrized one with the
user's locale. I am not
Igor,
anyways, just letting you know the intention behind the converters in
wicket.
OK - that's exactly the thing that needs to be crystal clear.
So the bottom line is that the if in your scenario the user entering lower
case strings is acceptable then, in Wicket, the conversion to upper-case
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 8:12 AM, jWeekend jweekend_for...@cabouge.com wrote:
Igor,
If there was a Java type called UpperCaseString that's what the developer
would use as the underlying object and you would not have this objection.
What's the difference between a converter translating
Hi: Gurus, I am trying to render a form and looks like wicket is not
rendering the form elements in right sequence, here is my markup that is
having the issues
tr
tdSearch feed by name:/td
tdinput type=text
Hallo,
how can i place components (buttons, links etc) in a ModalWindow which is
displayed by div class w_content_3??? Is there an possibility to structure
the modalwindow analog the css-classes.
Thanks for help...
--
View this message in context:
Don't put the input type=radio / in a td.
Should be:
tr
tdSearch feed by name:/td
tdinput type=text wicket:id=feedName//td
/tr
tr
td
Sorry Pointbreak, I did not change the Comparators. They are identical
to Johan's example. All I did was to add the equals() and hascode()
methods, aligning the equals with the Comparator, as described by the specs.
Indeed, maybe I am missing Johan's point. But early in this thread Johan
So what's the result o this?
My dear customer, actually it is not possible to upper-case your
input because type conversion doesn't fit, validation is the wrong
place,too, and javascript uppercasing is not reliable if javascript is
disabled. However we can compute the 100.000.000 digit of
Mattler thanks for the tip, It did work like a charm, but I am bit confuse
about this behavior.
Regards,
RJ.
rmattler wrote:
Don't put the input type=radio / in a td.
Should be:
tr
tdSearch feed by name:/td
Thank you for checking it out!! I'm going through the html now.
Michael Sparer wrote:
i just tested your code and it worked for me. maybe there's something
wrong in the basepage? or in the markup?
--
View this message in context:
Dear Software House,
We realise that our requirement is very demanding and challenging but we are
not used to such honestly; we usually have to pay for several man years of a
team of top software experts before they discover that they cannot deliver a
solution to our problem.
As a sign of our
Here's the culprit:
wicket:link # Home
{above is an html link}
Don't know why I used wicket:link
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Button-onSubmit-not-called%2C-instead-page-reloads-tp22350921p22357126.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list
if you want the users to have to enter the uppercase then use a
validator, if you want to uppercase for them then override getinput()
on the textfield and perform the uppercasing there.
-igor
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 9:46 AM, Peter Ertl pe...@gmx.org wrote:
So what's the result o this?
My dear
Due to the mind-boggling complexity of this issue I wrote an open
source library 'upstring.jar' which provides plenty of useful stuff...
example classes and methods...
- class UpperCaseString
- class LowerCaseString
- class InitialUpperCaseWithRemainingLowerCaseString
- class CamelCaseString
But now you are completely breaking My contact
My object is an database object
MyObject
{
id
name
}
MyObject is only equals if the id is the same
But now i want a TreeSet that orders by name (sometimes case is
important,sometimes not)
Those things are not the same!
I cant make my object
Could there be any unexpected consequences when just up-casing the
string in the model's setter (setObject(...)) ?
like this...
void setObject(String input)
{
this.value = (input != null) ? input.toUpperCase() : null;
}
Am 05.03.2009 um 19:39 schrieb jWeekend:
Leszek,
Thank
Yes, I understand your point. It is also eloquently formulated in
http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=4730113.
Maybe try to submit a patch via http://openjdk.java.net/ ?
Regards,
Dave
Johan Compagner wrote:
But now you are completely breaking My contact
My object is an
I know this has been a while, but was this ever resolved? We're seeing the
same problem. And, because of this problem, Wicket is never cleaning up old
session pagemap files which leads to oodles of files in our tomcat work
directory.
Thanks,
Meetesh
On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 5:55 AM, Carlos Pita
Unfortunately I wasn't able to reproduce this so I don't think this
got resolved.
-Matej
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 8:47 PM, Meetesh Karia meetesh.ka...@gmail.com wrote:
I know this has been a while, but was this ever resolved? We're seeing the
same problem. And, because of this problem, Wicket
I'm not sure I can provide any additional information as we just started
looking into it (though we've been seeing it for a while). For the time
being, I'm just going to set up a cron job to remove old pagemap files.
Perhaps we could make the restore block allow a null lastPage? Btw - what
I understand what Mr. Mattler said but is it correct from the HTML
point of view? Anybody knows what the HTML specification says about
it?
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 2:49 PM, rjilani jil...@lifebiosystems.com wrote:
Mattler thanks for the tip, It did work like a charm, but I am bit confuse
about
you have two tds in your first tr, but 3 in your next one.
also wicket just generates the html, how the browser renders it is not
dependent on wicket.
-igor
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 9:15 AM, rjilani jil...@lifebiosystems.com wrote:
Hi: Gurus, I am trying to render a form and looks like wicket
You will also get this error when you accidentally use a WebComponent
instead of a WebMarkupContainer. The first does not allow embedded
content and will therefor issue this error.
Regards,
Erik.
Edwin Ansicodd wrote:
I find this error in my log file when a wicket page loads. Would
Igor,
You made it very clear why a converter isn't appropriate.
And also why you shouldn't use a Validator when you don't want to force the
user to enter uppercase.
But what's your opinion about using an UpperCasingModel ?
Downside of overriding getInput is that you'd have to do it on
Hi,
I would like to create a table/grid in wicket for presenting multiple time
series in one table. I have three time series to present in one table. Each
time series is stored as a map with date as key and value as double
(MapDate, Double). The table/grid would consist of four columns; the
Jurek,
http://wicketstuff.org/grid-examples/data-grid/editable.1 This is quite
nice.
Regads - Cemal
http://jWeekend.com jWeekend
Jurek Piasek wrote:
Hi,
I would like to create a table/grid in wicket for presenting multiple time
series in one table. I have three time series to
Where is the 'conditionChoice' in the markup?
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 2:15 PM, rjilani jil...@lifebiosystems.com wrote:
Hi: Gurus, I am trying to render a form and looks like wicket is not
rendering the form elements in right sequence, here is my markup that is
having the issues
Dear all,
How can you solve the problem?
I used wicket1.3.5, also have the problem: can not save with the error:
java.lang.IllegalAccessError: tried to access method
org.apache.wicket.Component.onModelChanging()V from class
org.apache.wicket.extensions.ajax.markup.html.AjaxEditableLabel$1
any
Hello!
I have a question: in my application there are several locales and the user
can choose locale on the fly. Locale is stored in the session and all is ok
while the session exists. But! When the session is expired the application
must say user about this and it does - using default locale.
Hi,
How to use Equal InputValidator in wicket can any one give small
example on it.
Regards,
Srinviasa Raju CH.
Get your world in your inbox!
Mail, widgets, documents, spreadsheets, organizer and much more with your
Sifymail WIYI id!
Log on to http://www.sify.com
** DISCLAIMER
Martijn,
I see your point about users clicking fast and causing an exception if
I keep a User in the session (transient or otherwise). I too would be
curious to see some example code of how you handle the situation.
Thanks,
Tauren
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 11:47 PM, Alexander Lohse
Hello,
I have a main application and in a page i put an iframe. the source of that
iframe is another wicket application. now when navigate to the application
in the iframe and then click other menus in main application the page
expired. what could go wrong? there is no stacktrace displayed.
May be cookie?
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 12:20 PM, ElSe els...@mail.ru wrote:
Hello!
I have a question: in my application there are several locales and the user
can choose locale on the fly. Locale is stored in the session and all is ok
while the session exists. But! When the session is
I already told that in this thread: move your entity storage to your
custom request cycle, and just keep the entity identifier in your
custom session. then always access the entity either directly from the
request cycle, or through delegates from your session. There's no
rocket science here.
97 matches
Mail list logo
