Both articles avoid the DiskPageStore problem by using the HttpSessionStore,
however if you do a search through the mailing list archives for
HttpSessionStore you'll find numerous references to problems in using it in
the long term and especially in a real, production application, so I don't
Maarten Bosteels wrote:
But AFAIK GAE doesn't use/guarantee sticky sessions, so I am afraid
you can't rely on local memory.
App Engine uses multiple web servers to run your application, and
automatically adjusts the number of servers it is using to handle
requests reliably. A given request may
Slightly o/t ...
Is there a way, in Gmane to limit the view to a bookmarkable tree of
responses to a single thread?
The frameset doesn't work for me since the articles I'm looking at don't
appear in the URL. The article specific url doesn't work for me since it
doesn't provide any context or
I've always seen it done as public. Anyways I checked the javadoc and the
access modifier does not matter.
On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 1:56 AM, Eelco Hillenius
eelco.hillen...@gmail.comwrote:
The purpose of the *public* static final long serialVersionUID is for
long
Why do you stress *public*?
Good news:
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java/msg/f50bbb131dc524c1
quote
HttpSessions will work out of the box if you enable them in your
appengine-web.xml.
We do not guarantee that all requests for the same session go to the same
JVM, but persistence of sessions is managed
I'm not sure if I understand this right, are you talking about
javax.swing.JOptionPane? While wicket shares some concepts with swing
and maybe the TreeModel classes, it has nothing to do with swing
except both are loosely based on the same principles, event driven
etc. So no, you cannot use swing
I have a web page with a simple design where a NavigationPanel
contains a few links which replace the main panel with other panels.
My problem is that when I initialize this web page, it creates all of
the panels which will eventually replace a main panel (according to
the link in the
Thank you for your mail. I am presently on vacation and will return April 14th.
If you need urgent assistance, please email supp...@bookingbooster.com. You can
also reach our Support via Skype callto://premiersupport
Thank you
Best regards,
Nick Wheeler
Booking Booster.com
t: +44 (0)1273
Nice.
I think thats actually more important than we've been giving it credit
for in this thread!
- Brill Pappin
On 12-Apr-09, at 12:51 AM, Luther Baker wrote:
I don't know much about it ... but would something like Terracotta
use/require/leverage the serialVersionUID for something not
It wouldn't because its not really meant as an accessible member of
the class.
It's used at a lower level and would be accessible regardless of the
scope.
- Brill Pappin
On 12-Apr-09, at 1:46 PM, Ben Tilford wrote:
I've always seen it done as public. Anyways I checked the javadoc
and
you should only create the panels when the user clicks on the link
add(new link(..) {
onclick() {
panel=new somepanel(...);
((mypage)getpage()).setcontentpanel(panel);
}
}
-igor
On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 5:56 PM, Henrique Boregio hbore...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a web page with a simple
How can I be sure that there is only 1 instance of somepanel? If the user
clicks 10 times the link, 10 different panels would be created in memory.
igor.vaynberg wrote:
you should only create the panels when the user clicks on the link
add(new link(..) {
onclick() {
panel=new
not exactly
everytime you click you would do:
{contentpanel.replace(newpanel); contentpanel=newpanel; }
the last line: contentpanel=newpanel; frees up the reference to the
old panel which will be garbage collected
-igor
On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 8:55 PM, quiqueq hbore...@gmail.com wrote:
How
13 matches
Mail list logo
