prepend/append javascript should work.
-Matej
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 11:15 PM, Scott Swank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is apparently an IE6 bug, in that inserting an image in the dom
above the select screws up the tabindex/focus in some way. If I have
the span/image already in the dom and
that the component does not get the
value from the model on rendering.
Please see the doubts section at the end of the original e-mail.
Thanks again,
German
2008/9/9 Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The link that shows the modal window must be AjaxButton/SubmitLink.
-Matej
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 11
.
Thanks,
German
2008/9/10 Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I would need a quick start to see where it is going wrong.
-Matej
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 7:26 PM, German Morales
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Investigating a little more, my problem seems to be caused by
AjaxFormSubmitBehavior#onEvent
, not
with the root form.
Am i right?
German
PS: meanwhile i'm trying to produce a quickstart... but i guess it will take
me some time.
2008/9/10 Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
But that is exactly what should happen. Wicket javascript should find
root form element and serialize that. Can you
up to that second
form.
I'm looking at the live Modal window example
http://www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples/ajax/modal-window.1
and i see that this behavior of adding a separated div at body level is
normal, not something strange in my structure.
German
2008/9/10 Matej Knopp [EMAIL
that the reason of my problem?
That is intentional. I don't think that should cause you the problems.
-Matej
German
2008/9/10 Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Check if your DOM hierarchy is valid, e.g. if you don't have any div
tag inside span tags.
-Matej
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 10:08 PM, German
It has to be done different way. you can do it with onsuccess
callback. This might be a bit tricky with current ajax implementation,
it will be much easier in Wicket 1.5
-Matej
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 12:16 AM, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
Im doing a mootip
The link that shows the modal window must be AjaxButton/SubmitLink.
-Matej
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 11:20 PM, German Morales
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I've a problem with Forms and ModalWindows.
I have this stuff:
-a page with a main Form (the only one that is rendered as an HTML form
Hi,
the problem is that you are doing this:
new PropertyModel(getModelObject(),latestVersion.title)));
This is not really model chaining, you bind PropertyModel with your
Document diretly (not with the DocumentModel).
You can try new PropertyModel(getModel(),latestVersion.title)));
or just new
Yes, if
a) the session hasn't expired yet (there's inactivity period after
which session expires, usually set to 30 minutes)
b) user hasn't closed the browser - the session cookie is still valid
or c) session id is encoded in URL.
-Matej
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 9:47 AM, Liz Huber [EMAIL
if you use renderOnDomReadyJavascript method of IHeaderResponse it
will be invoked after ajax request.
-Matej
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 3:41 PM, Pointbreak
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a couple of behaviors that add javascript to the header of a
document, to change attributes or add event
This should be fixed in latest trunk and latest of 1.3 branch. You can
either use snapshots or disable javascript stripping until you'll be
able to upgrade.
-Matej
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 3:56 PM, FakeBoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all,
I have some problem with using my app in DEPLOYMENT
Safari supports DOMParser since 2.0.1, thus both WebKit and Chrome
(which uses WebKit) support that as well.
-Matej
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 5:26 PM, lesterburlap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is the related section of wicket-ajax.js (~line 985 in 1.3.4) right
before that error message is
: Invoking pre-call handler(s)...
INFO: Received ajax response (0 characters)
INFO:
ERROR: Error while parsing response: Could not find root ajax-response
element
INFO: Invoking post-call handler(s)...
INFO: Invoking failure handler(s)...
HTH
-Chris
Matej Knopp-2 wrote:
Modal window seems
There is yet another thing to consider. Iphone doesn't cache resources
bigger than 25kb (after unzipping). So instead of grouping files
together sometimes it even might be appropriate to split them...
-Matej
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 4:11 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's not the pages that have
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 10:13 PM, Shaun Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm currently running into an issue with the wicket modal window.
My situation is this.
Wicket App A contains an IFrame sourcing Wicket App B.
B has an Wicket IFrame modal window on one of it's pages.
When
Modal window seems to work fine for me, except that events are not
propagated when mouse is over iframe.
Tabbed panel works fine, so does editable label and clock example.
(tested with latest 1.4 examples)
-Matej
On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 11:53 PM, cstein1206 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have
What good it is to tell us which version you are using? The latest is
IIRC updated 16 so your JDK/JRE is really outdated. Please update your
JDK first before complaining. And when it still doesn't work let us
know.
-Matej
On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 3:34 PM, wicket user [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i am
Was it bookmarkable URL or hybrid?
-Matej
On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 11:05 PM, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This should work find if you version your pages.
Can you make an jira issue with a sample?
On 8/29/08, Ritesh Trivedi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have tried opening 2
this makes the URL to have ?wicket:interface.. Shouldnt mounted bookmarkable
pages - even though they are created using constructor have the mounted url
format?
I will try to create a sample app to reproduce the issue.
Matej Knopp-2 wrote:
Was it bookmarkable URL or hybrid?
-Matej
On Sun, Aug 31
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 9:41 AM, Peter Ertl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I totally agree that having the version in the filename and not in the query
string will be a-lot-better.
Just wanted to point you to that option so you can include it in your
excellent analysis on caching *thanks* :-)
You might want to try putting the link to a panel and returning panel
from newContentComponent();
-Matej
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 3:38 PM, leroudav [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi everyone!
First of all, thanks for helping 2 french wicket padawan developers :-)
We tried to make a Tree for our
Hi,
You can create a jira issue for it, unfortunately I don't think I'll
be able to try to reproduce it as I don't have any machine with W98 +
IE6 around. Who does use that anyway? Last time I checked it was
2008...
(Anyway, even for Windows 98 there are bunch of browsers available
that are way
:) Lightbox, not livebox
2008/8/28 Tomasz Prus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wicket 1.3.4
When i add livebox JS script and google maps then livebox doesn't
work
properly because wicket-event is added twice.
2008/8/27 Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What wicket version? This should be filtered
Probably not for 1.3/1.4. We could have something like that for 1.5
(where the ajax pipeline is completely new).
-Matej
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 6:23 PM, John Krasnay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm testing some Ajax-y Wicket pages with Selenium. One challenge I'm
having is finding a good
Hi,
the long running process should be executed in separate thread. You
can make wicket periodically poll for result (via ajax). It is
generally not a good idea to run action that potentially can take long
time to complete from a request thread.
-Matej
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 8:42 PM, Jan
:
I agree, that's a better long-term fix. Even so, isn't it wrong that the
request from a new window is locked waiting on the other window's page map -
I would have thought the new window should have ended up with its own page
map?
Regards,
Jan
2008/8/29 Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi
Don't specify the id. Just put there null, the javascript will be
always rendered.
-Matej
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 3:20 AM, 张伟 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I use the renderJavascript(java.lang.CharSequence javascript,
java.lang.String id) method in HeaderResponse class to output the
What wicket version? This should be filtered by wicket.
-Matej
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 4:13 PM, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
show us some code..:)
Tomasz Prus wrote:
Hi
I have problem because wicket-event.js is added twice and couse error.
(each
Hi,
I haven't announced yet publicly but for some time I was working on
Ajax implementation for 1.5.
The work is available in /repos/asf/wicket/sandbox/knopp/experimental/wicket
I will put together a wiki page when I have some free time.
I have of course considered jquery. I gave it a proper
Generally it's not a good idea to use frames for things like this.
Especially with a stateful framework like wicket. Are you absolutely
necessary you need frames? Why?
-Matej
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 3:45 PM, fish3934 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have a web application that required to use
framework is to get rid of most of the low level browser specific code
we have currently so that I wouldn't have to maintain it :)
-Matej
Matej Knopp-2 wrote:
Hi,
I haven't announced yet publicly but for some time I was working on
Ajax implementation for 1.5.
The work is available in
/repos
Right now there really isn't any practical reason for having
IClusterable at all.
Even terracotta uses regular serialization to get pages over cluster.
-Matej
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 10:26 PM, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
if you have objects that would be kept in the session, you
in web development :)
my 2 pct
Am 26.08.2008 um 22:19 schrieb Matej Knopp:
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 9:24 PM, jWeekend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Matej,
What are the implications of the decision to base Wicket Ajax Next
Generation on YUI in terms of choosing a Javascript library
The Apache word needs some kerning adjustments :)
-Matej
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 2:19 PM, Daan van Etten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the inspiration... black looks really nice!
Imagine a black t-shirt or a black mug with this:
http://stuq.nl/media/image/apache-wicket-tshirt-black.png
Hi,
the source code is available in the Wicket Stuff SVN
https://wicket-stuff.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/wicket-stuff/trunk/inmethod-grid/
-Matej
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 5:09 PM, Fkleinko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thank you but where can i download the jar or even beter the osgi bundle.
-wicket-tshirt.png
http://stuq.nl/media/image/apache-wicket-tshirt-black.png
Regards,
Daan
On 21 aug 2008, at 14:46, Matej Knopp wrote:
The Apache word needs some kerning adjustments :)
-Matej
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 2:19 PM, Daan van Etten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks
Go ahead, feel free to post the job ads, as long as they are wicket related.
-Matej
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 4:07 PM, Wayne Pope
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi everyone,
whats the policy here about advertising jobs or project/dev oppertunities?
I'm creating something new and I'm looking for
Just mount the page with HybridUrlCodingStrategy.
-Matej
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 3:50 PM, miro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Assume I passed my instance in setResponse() method , in this case wicket
generates its own url basically from the session , so this means i cannot
expect to have the
That is right.
-Matej
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 6:46 PM, James Carman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ahh, so the information is serialized in the same thread, but the
actual saving to disk goes on in another thread. Is that right?
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 12:38 PM, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Of course they do need to be saved.
What if after the ajax request there is regular request that shows new
page. User goes back and expects to see the previous page as it was
after the *last* ajax request, so we need to save and serialize it.
-Matej
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 7:29 PM, John
I was thinking about implementing it like this.
But, it would make code that is already complicated even more
complicated. What's worst, it wouldn't work in clustered environment
where you need to send the page across cluster on every request.
So the possible performance benefit of this would
I think think it is. Go ahead if you feel like it.
-Matej
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 5:02 PM, James Carman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I need to write that down. I think I keep forgetting that. Is this
stuff outlined/discussed on one of the wiki pages?
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 10:17 AM, Matej
I hoped for full back button support for ajax...
I bet you did...
-Matej
-Matej
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 7:14 PM, John Patterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But all access to the session is serialised? I don't see where a version
could be lost
Normal request for page A: store in
probably yui version clashes...
-Matej
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 5:58 PM, miata [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you have the solution, I have the same problem...
madx wrote:
Error: lang.later is not a function
Source File:
perhaps the metadate generification could stand another look.
-Matej
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 5:22 PM, John Patterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi fellow wicketeers, I was wondering why Application.setMetaData() is
defined to take an Object and not a T or ? extends T. I'm sure there's
Just making feedback panel write markup id doesn't mean your
application has to be all ajaxy...
-Matej
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 8:25 AM, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I still for one try to get ajax away for public(unauthorized) parts, for
seo and caching
Hi,
This is caused by the fact that component border is rendered
after/before behaviors. We can't really change this for 1.3 because it
could break existing applications. I have changed the rendering order
in trunk (1.4) though.
-Matej
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 3:36 PM, Kaspar Fischer [EMAIL
Can't you just override isEnabled() on the inner form and return
true/false depending on whether the inner form should be processed?
-Matej
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 10:42 PM, John Krasnay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi folks,
I find myself occasionally using nested forms in my Wicket apps. With
Hi,
if you add those components in getDependentFormComponents() it
probably won't work, because the validate method will only be called
if all of those components are valid. Which kinda renders your
validator useless :) So your approach with returning empty list is
probably right.
-Matej
On
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 5:01 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 12:38 AM, pixologe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but still I would be even happier with wicket if there was a hybrid solution
which enabled a page to hold state beyond its pretty URL params
There will be
Hi,
with current layout it is not possible for the TreeTable to have
variable row height.
-Matej
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 2:13 PM, kag1526 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am using a tree table to display data from a database, however some of the
rows in the tree table needs to have multiple values
If you want to show messages on another page you need to use session
feedback messages (getSession().info)
-Matej
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 9:47 PM, insom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a submit button that adds a message to my FeedbackPanel, like so:
if (isTestPassed()) {
...
} else
If you want to show messages on another page you need to use session
feedback messages (getSession().info)
-Matej
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 9:47 PM, insom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a submit button that adds a message to my FeedbackPanel, like so:
if (isTestPassed()) {
...
} else
I think for 1.5 we should escape the tag attributes automatically.
-Matej
On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 4:49 PM, Stefan Fußenegger
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
no comments here?
Stefan Fußenegger wrote:
While validating some of my pages, I found out that some pages do not
validate due to in
The method signature has changed. The TreeNode argument has been
changed to Object. This you are probably not overriding the method.
-Matej
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 10:09 PM, Goldstein, Jonathan A
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My tree behavior was working fine using Wicket 1.3.3, but after migrating
585.422.4161
Internal 8*702-4161
Ease of Use Common Room 585.422.0731
Internal 8*702.0731
Fax 585.422.8116
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PSG.Workflow Business Unit.Workflow Business Team.FFPS Ease of Use Team
www.xerox.com
-Original Message-
From: Matej Knopp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
you have to encode the necessary state yourself into the page
parameters. There is no way for Wicket to be able how to serialize the
state in the URL in some magic way.
Martijn
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 9:41 AM, Uwe Schäfer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matej Knopp schrieb
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 2:23 PM, Paul Logasa Bogen II [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I develop in Eclipse with SVN for source control. I user FFX3 with
WebDeveloper Toolbar to debug
CSS and Venkman to debug js (although if someone knows of a better js
debugger please tell me).
My project uses MySQL
if it is possible to add different node components if I
want to use the CheckBoxIconPanel or id what you suggested the only way to
get this working...
Thanks in advance,
vishy
Matej Knopp-2 wrote:
You have to use different panel for each Tree item (depending on the
tree node for that item
Hi,
mount the page using HybridUrlCodingStrategy.
The url for page instance (you can use PageLink for that) will than look
like /foo/document/21.5 (where .5 denotes page instance). Note that
such url *is* bookmarkable, the page instance number doesn't matter.
Unfortunately wicket has to store
You have to use different panel for each Tree item (depending on the
tree node for that item). If you use BaseTree, implement the
#newNodeComponent method accordingly. You can look at LinkTree or
LabelTree for an example of how the implementation can look like.
Or you can use LinkTree, override
You need to show some code.
-Matej
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 1:33 AM, vishy_sb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there anyone who has any clue about how this has to be done???
vishy_sb wrote:
Hi all,
I have Modal Window which contains a panel. Inside the panel I am trying
to perform a
Firefox) under Debian i686 and Debian x86_64
I am using Wicket 1.3.4 and the inMethod DataGrid is the current SVN code
under the 1.3.x branch.
plb
Matej Knopp wrote:
We use grid in modal window all the time. Can you be more specific
about the setup (browser, grid version, wicket version
Too many constrains? Really?
Just write a model that pull the image from whatever you want (even as
static object property for that matter). Just because the model is
serializable doesn't mean that the model object has to be
serializable. That's a big differece.
I've done a lot of JCR related
We use grid in modal window all the time. Can you be more specific
about the setup (browser, grid version, wicket version)?
-Matej
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 10:56 PM, Paul Logasa Bogen II [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Howdy,
First of I'd like to say that I think Wicket is fantastic and after trying
The postponing message should only be visible in ajax log. It only
says that another request is in progress so the current one is
postponed until the previous one finishes.
-Matej
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 8:16 PM, Arun Wagle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I have a Modal dialog box which has
the modified data
again.
It does nothing.
How should I handle this if I have to do multiple submit one after another
immediately ?
Can you suggest some solution ?
Regards,
Arun Wagle
Matej Knopp-2 wrote:
The postponing message should only be visible in ajax log. It only
says that another
Wicket does not support back button for ajax requests. The problem is
that ajax request can not modify the URL without reloading the page
(apart from changing the hash part (after #), bu that never makes to
the server. There are solutions for enabling back button for ajax
applications, but they
I'm sorry about this. It should be fixed in trunk.
Did the broken revision made it to 1.4m3?
-Matej
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 7:31 PM, Matthew Hanlon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just updated my 1.4 SNAPSHOT to revision 676639 and I've started noticing
an error in ModalWindow when using
Looks like M3 should be fine.
-Matej
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 7:51 PM, Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm sorry about this. It should be fixed in trunk.
Did the broken revision made it to 1.4m3?
-Matej
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 7:31 PM, Matthew Hanlon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just
It is necessary as wicket uses serialization to make snapshot of page
state to be able to revert it back on back button.
-Matej
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 10:37 AM, Daniele Dellafiore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am wondering if page serialization in wicket is always necessary. I
have read this:
Holding a JDBC connection in session is hardly a good idea. Anyway,
take a look at HttpSessionListener.
-Matej
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 5:39 PM, Stefan Lindner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How can I handle the end of a Session? I have a Session thet holds a
JDBC-Connection. Now I want to close this
This is a bit tricky thing to do. You'd have to redirect from ajax request.
so you could get URL for the request listener and then use
RedirectRequestTarget.
-Matej
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 10:23 PM, jwray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have the situation in which an action applied to a
functionality.
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 5:32 AM, Timo Rantalaiho [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 02 Jul 2008, Matej Knopp wrote:
I still don't see what's wrong with GenericPanel. It's certainly much
easier to type than ModelContainingPanel.
Nothing wrong with that either, it's just very generic
Ligther? Does it meen with no Compund and ComponentAssignedModel?
Wouldn't that feel more like crippled?
The default model slot doesn't take any runtime space when you don't
use it, property would. And removing four methods from component will
hardly make it much lighter.
-Matej
On Thu, Jul 3,
And there is some functionality in there that Wicket might
be better without. For example, onModelChanged / Changing
things become tricky when you share the same model between
different instances. And when using setModelObject() with an
object that is equal to the current model object, but a
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 9:51 AM, Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And there is some functionality in there that Wicket might
be better without. For example, onModelChanged / Changing
things become tricky when you share the same model between
different instances. And when using
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 10:02 AM, Eelco Hillenius
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 12:47 AM, Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ligther? Does it meen with no Compund and ComponentAssignedModel?
Wouldn't that feel more like crippled?
The default model slot doesn't take any
at 10:08 AM, Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 10:02 AM, Eelco Hillenius
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 12:47 AM, Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ligther? Does it meen with no Compund and ComponentAssignedModel?
Wouldn't that feel more like crippled
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 10:02 AM, Eelco Hillenius
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 12:47 AM, Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ligther? Does it meen with no Compund and ComponentAssignedModel?
Wouldn't that feel more like crippled?
The default model slot doesn't take any
Yeah, we don't shrink the files. We can't, that's not how
DiskPageStore works. Anyway, what's the usecase? Are you trying to
suggest that you're running out of disk space? :)
-Matej
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 10:18 AM, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
that wont work.
Because pages are
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 4:28 AM, Timo Rantalaiho [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 01 Jul 2008, Matej Knopp wrote:
There is one thing that helped me quite a lot when migration the
project I'm working out. I've created GenericPanel,
GenericWebMarkupContainer and GenericFragment classes. In most
Committed fix to trunk and 1.3.
-Matej
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 7:10 PM, mfs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can someone take a look into thisits a blocking issue for me
Thanks in advance
mfs wrote:
Guys,
I am facing this issue (with Safari/IE) with the usage of AjaxLink when
used on a
I'm not very eager about this. The interface listeners URLs are quite
long, why making them even longer while bringing no additional
benefit? Also are you sure thath your patch won't break under any
circumstances relative urls? It took us a while to get relative URLs
working reliably, I wouldn't
There is one thing that helped me quite a lot when migration the
project I'm working out. I've created GenericPanel,
GenericWebMarkupContainer and GenericFragment classes. In most cases
the only change was renaming PanelMyClass to GenericPanelMyClass.
I was wondering, even though those classes
Firefox caches the wrong version of DOM with the page. Unfortunately
the only workaround I know about is to force firefox reloading page on
backbutton by sending the no-store header. Look at WebPage#setHeaders.
-Matej
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 11:06 PM, Kaspar Fischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I
Any chance you can try it with latest trunk?
-Matej
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 3:18 PM, Artem D. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I've got wicket 1.4-m2 based application running on two different network
hosts configured as Tomcat 6 Simple TCP cluster.
I try to simulate failover with session
DefaultAbstractTree is indeed still deprecated and will be removed in
1.5. Closest to DefaultAbstractTree in the terms of functionality
comes LinkTree, that uses LinkIconPanel as content component.
LinkIconPanel does contain node icons. Look at the LinkTree source
code, it's really short.
-Matej
Mind showing us some code? The pattern you are describing here is very
common and it should work quite well.
-Matej
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 12:55 AM, David Nedrow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm, Google is not being helpful.
Is there a way to contribute CSS when a Panel is added to a page?
I
. If it does it might be problem with Ajax header
contribution.
-Matej
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 1:04 AM, Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mind showing us some code? The pattern you are describing here is very
common and it should work quite well.
-Matej
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 12:55 AM
Apart from the fact that this would be even more verbose than current
generics approach this would probably also radically increase
component memory footprint.
-Matej
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 7:03 AM, cowwoc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have you considered moving from subclassing to composition in
I think that should be already fixed in SVN. We didn't remove the
entries on session expiration.
-Matej
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 2:26 PM, Juha Alatalo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We are now using patched version of 1.3.X in a production environment and
usage of memory seems to be much more stable.
Looks like you are using the old tree...
-Matej
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 8:40 AM, Dimedrol [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jwcarman wrote:
getTreeState().expandAll()?
Hmmm, seems like I dont' have this procedure.
See screenshot - http://i27.tinypic.com/30sg3t4.gif
which is exactly what we are trying to avoid - having generics in Component.
-Matej
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 6:19 PM, Ricky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know if i was clear enough, sorry about that.
I meant if you have something like :
public ComponentMODEL extends IMODELID, ID extends
The decoupling doesn't have to be extremely painful. We could leave
support for the default slot in component, something like this:
class Component {
protected void setDefaultModel(IModel? model);
protected IModel? getDefaultModel();
}
class MyComponentT extends Component {
public void
The dots are there for a reason. Wicket generates relative URLs.
-Matej
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 8:44 AM, Tomasz Prus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have links like this
a class=B href=../../../Logowanie
in page source. My boss wants i remove these dots.
Can anyone help me ?
Hi,
it shouldn't be called twice. I'll take a look into it.
-Matej
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 9:36 AM, RUMikeP [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
Please can someone let me know if it is bug or if there is a reason why when
paging using the inmethod data grid, two calls are made to the datasource,
There are also implementation issues that need to be considered.
Currently the model is stored in a way that it doesn't take any place
when not used.
Having multiple models is rare, however, having one model that can
(but doesn't have to) be used is more common imho. Wicket is kinda
optimized for
I don't really think this is the right discussion we should be having now :)
Maybe 1.5 would be the right release for changes like that (if they
are justified, which i'm not really convinced it is. Anyway, as I said
before, storing (single) model in component has no overhead, so I
don't really see
201 - 300 of 709 matches
Mail list logo
