On 1/29/08, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think a community@ list is preferable for ongoing community issues. But
this will not eliminate the (need for) use of user@ for user group efforts,
as the new community list will not be as populated as the user@ list.
I've proposed this
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
On 1/29/08, James Carman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Remember, these mailing
lists are used by thousands of people all over the world and they're
here for a specific reason, to learn about Wicket (or to help others).
Remember that we are all humans, and
If the user groups are split onto a separate thread I would like to
see meeting announcements cross-posted to this list so that it's as
easy as possible for new users to find the meetings.
- Scott
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On 1/29/08, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/29/08, James Carman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There has been some concern over the proper usage of the Wicket
mailing lists.
Not really, just you :-)
I count as some! :-)
The way most (if not all) Wicket committers keep track of this list (and all
other mailing lists for that matter) is to use gmail as their list reading
platform. The threaded view of gmail is unsurpassed IMO.
I have 0 unread Wicket messages on all lists I'm subscribed to: user, dev,
commits,
you can also use thunderbird[1], it has a similar threaded view.
[1]=http://www.mozilla-europe.org/da/products/thunderbird/
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
The way most (if not all) Wicket committers keep track of this list (and all
other mailing lists for that matter) is to use gmail as their list
There has been some concern over the proper usage of the Wicket
mailing lists. Here's what I propose:
users - used for folks to ask/answer questions concerning the wicket framework
announcements - used for announcing releases, upcoming user group meetings, etc.
developers - used for the actual
Yeah, I had a thought on that aswell...
regards Nino
Scott Swank wrote:
If the user groups are split onto a separate thread I would like to
see meeting announcements cross-posted to this list so that it's as
easy as possible for new users to find the meetings.
- Scott
Scott Swank wrote:
If the user groups are split onto a separate thread I would like to
see meeting announcements cross-posted to this list so that it's as
easy as possible for new users to find the meetings.
That kinds of defeats the purpose. So not splitting would be better IMHO.
On 1/29/08, James Carman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any conversation that becomes personal in nature (well wishes for
other people's loved ones for example) should be taken off-line, since
it's just not relevant to the rest of us.
I agree in partial with this sentiment, however...
Remember,
On 1/29/08, James Carman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There has been some concern over the proper usage of the Wicket
mailing lists.
Not really, just you :-)
Here's what I propose:
users - used for folks to ask/answer questions concerning the wicket
framework
announcements - used for
a big +1 from me, dont know how i would deal with all this traffic
without gmail...
-igor
On Jan 29, 2008 8:26 AM, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The way most (if not all) Wicket committers keep track of this list (and all
other mailing lists for that matter) is to use gmail as
Where do I sign up for wicketstuff-user and wicketstuff-dev?
Is this mentioned on the wicketstuff wiki?
-regards Nino
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
The way most (if not all) Wicket committers keep track of this list (and all
other mailing lists for that matter) is to use gmail as their list reading
Strike that.
Robby O'Connor wrote:
Isn't it just a SF mailing list? I'd say via the sf project page?
Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael wrote:
Where do I sign up for wicketstuff-user and wicketstuff-dev?
Is this mentioned on the wicketstuff wiki?
-regards Nino
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
Isn't it just a SF mailing list? I'd say via the sf project page?
Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael wrote:
Where do I sign up for wicketstuff-user and wicketstuff-dev?
Is this mentioned on the wicketstuff wiki?
-regards Nino
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
The way most (if not all) Wicket
ahh ok, I thought so.. but got in doubt..
Maurice Marrink wrote:
wicket stuff does not have a separate mailinglist anymore, just use
the wicket userlist
Maurice
On Jan 29, 2008 10:37 PM, Robby O'Connor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Strike that.
Robby O'Connor wrote:
Isn't it just a SF
16 matches
Mail list logo
