Hello,
I still didn't find the time to make a blog post about this. So I just
put the code on pastebin:
http://pastebin.org/31242
I'm looking forward to your feedback :)
I tested this filter on Jetty and Tomcat (with Firefox' user agent
switcher) where it worked fine. However, as stated in the
Hello everybody,
I just want to add my 2 cents to this discussion.
At IndyPhone we too wanted to get rid of jesessionid-URLs in google's index.
Yeah, it would be nice if the google bot would be as clever as the one from
yahoo, and just remove them himself. But he doesn't.
So I implemented a
Hi Rüdiger,
AFAIK this could lead to some punishment by google, as he browses the
site multiple times using different agents and origin IPs and in case he
sees different behaviours he thinks about cloaking/ prepared content and
will act accordingly to it;
This is usually noticed after the
Hm, SEO is really a little bit like black science sometimes *g*
This (german) article states, that SID cloaking would be ok for google:
http://www.trafficmaxx.de/blog/google/gutes-cloaking-schlechtes-cloaking
Some more googling, and here someone seems to confirm this:
Yeah, its quite a shame that google doesnt open source their logic ;)
would be nice if you could give us the code however, so we could have a
look at it :)
Rüdiger Schulz schrieb:
Hm, SEO is really a little bit like black science sometimes *g*
This (german) article states, that SID
Hi Rüdiger,
I would be very interested in the code.
If you can not find a suitable repository, could you just do something
simple like linking to a zip from a blog post?
Regards,
Erik.
Rüdiger Schulz wrote:
Hello everybody,
I just want to add my 2 cents to this discussion.
At
I'll wrap something up in the course of this week, and post it on my blog.
(so little time a.t.m.)
greetings,
Rüdiger
2008/4/14, Erik van Oosten [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Rüdiger,
I would be very interested in the code.
If you can not find a suitable repository, could you just do something
. That may be
good for SEO but it'll drive people away.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jeremy Thomerson
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 10:00 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Removing the jsessionid for SEO
I've been building
include query string parameters that look like session ids. From what I
remember Google can and does index pages with session ids BUT to a reduced
degree.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Removing-the-jsessionid-for-SEO-tp16464534p16646137.html
Sent from the Wicket - User
.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jeremy Thomerson
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 10:00 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Removing the jsessionid for SEO
I've been building a community-driven hunting and fishing site in Texas
Hi Jeremy,
Hi Dan,
for a project long ago I had the trail of making a product-browser SEO
friendly; I used a plain PagingNavigator at first, and then extended it
to have it to use the IndexedUrlPageParameters; this allowed me to put
anything into the path to have a nice URL;
the key here is
Subject: Re: Removing the jsessionid for SEO
We have a similar issue, and are trying the following out right now..
http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=enanswer=40367
User-agent: *
Disallow: /*?
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 9:09 PM, Dan Kaplan [EMAIL PROTECTED
.
Take care,
Artur
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Removing-the-jsessionid-for-SEO-tp16464534p16467396.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
;
}
}
return false;
}
}
I didn't test this code but I do similar thing in my old application in
Spring and it works.
Take care,
Artur
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Removing-the-jsessionid
Subject: Re: Removing the jsessionid for SEO
isnt google always saying that you shouldn't alter behavior of your site
depending of it is there bot or not?
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 1:00 PM, Artur W. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
igor.vaynberg wrote:
also by doing what you have done users
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Removing the jsessionid for SEO
isnt google always saying that you shouldn't alter behavior of your site
depending of it is there bot or not?
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 1:00 PM, Artur W. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
igor.vaynberg wrote:
also
: Removing the jsessionid for SEO
isnt google always saying that you shouldn't alter behavior of your site
depending of it is there bot or not?
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 1:00 PM, Artur W. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
igor.vaynberg wrote:
also by doing
AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Removing the jsessionid for SEO
isnt google always saying that you shouldn't alter behavior of your site
depending of it is there bot or not?
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 1:00 PM, Artur W. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
version: If google indexes that and tries to visit it again, won't it
report about an invalid session?
-Original Message-
From: Matej Knopp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 11:10 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Removing the jsessionid for SEO
On the other
?
-Original Message-
From: Matej Knopp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 11:10 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Removing the jsessionid for SEO
On the other hand, crawling non-bookmarkable pages is not very useful
anyway, since ?wicket:interface url
, 2008 3:22 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: RE: Removing the jsessionid for SEO
Regardless, at the very least this makes your site look weird and
unprofessional when google puts a jsessionid on your url. There has got to
be some negative effect when google visits it the second time
How? I asked how to do it before and nobody suggested this as a
possibility.
-Original Message-
From: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 3:26 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Removing the jsessionid for SEO
dataview can work
-
From: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 3:26 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Removing the jsessionid for SEO
dataview can work in a stateless mode, just use bookmarkable links inside it
-igor
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 3:22 PM, Dan
On 4/4/08, Dan Kaplan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Regardless, at the very least this makes your site look weird and
unprofessional when google puts a jsessionid on your url.
0.5% of your users care about the URL that is displayed in a google
search result. It doesn't look weird or unprofessional.
, 2008 3:30 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Removing the jsessionid for SEO
instead of
item.add(new link(foo) { onclick() });
do
item.add(new bookmarkablepagelink(foo, page.class));
-igor
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 3:28 PM, Dan Kaplan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How? I asked how to do
talking about the links that the Navigator generates.
How do I make it so page 2 is bookmarkable?
-Original Message-
From: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 3:30 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Removing the jsessionid for SEO
Awesome, thanks
-Original Message-
From: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 3:40 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Removing the jsessionid for SEO
you subclass the pagenavigator and make it use bookmarkable links
also. it has factory methods
-Original Message-
From: Martijn Dashorst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 3:36 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Removing the jsessionid for SEO
On 4/4/08, Dan Kaplan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Regardless, at the very least this makes your site look
On 4/4/08, Dan Kaplan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My URL ends with ;jsessionid=an7goabg0az (my actual situation). I
personally think that looks weirder than .php or .asp.
Nah, it shows that you are using Java. Much more sophisticated!
Where did you get that 0.5% statistic? Regardless, my
.
This is the crapwork that wicket does for you usually.
-igor
-Original Message-
From: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 3:40 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Removing the jsessionid for SEO
you subclass the pagenavigator
into
BookmarkablePagingNavigationLink? This seems like a lot of work. Am I
missing something critical?
-Original Message-
From: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 3:40 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Removing the jsessionid for SEO
::: and ?wicket:interface=:0:1::: and ...?
-Original Message-
From: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 5:45 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Removing the jsessionid for SEO
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 5:31 PM, Dan Kaplan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote
::: and ...?
-Original Message-
From: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 5:45 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Removing the jsessionid for SEO
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 5:31 PM, Dan Kaplan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Ok I did a little preliminary
PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 5:45 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Removing the jsessionid for SEO
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 5:31 PM, Dan Kaplan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Ok I did a little preliminary research on this. Right now
PagingNavigator
uses
, April 03, 2008 5:45 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Removing the jsessionid for SEO
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 5:31 PM, Dan Kaplan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Ok I did a little preliminary research on this. Right now
PagingNavigator
uses PagingNavigationLink's
: Removing the jsessionid for SEO
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 5:31 PM, Dan Kaplan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Ok I did a little preliminary research on this. Right now
PagingNavigator
uses PagingNavigationLink's to represent its page. This extends
Link.
I'm
supposed to override
victori_ provided this information on IRC and I just wanted to share it with
everyone else. Googlebot and others dont use cookies. This means when
they visit your site it adds ;jsessionid=code to the end of all your urls
they visit. When they re-visit it, they get a different code, consider
you would think that the crawl bots are smart enough to ignore
jsessionid tokens...
-igor
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 5:20 PM, Dan Kaplan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
victori_ provided this information on IRC and I just wanted to share it with
everyone else. Googlebot and others don't use cookies.
also by doing what you have done users with cookies disabled wont be
able to use your site...
-igor
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 7:44 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
you would think that the crawl bots are smart enough to ignore
jsessionid tokens...
-igor
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at
I have noticed something like this with http_check on nagios. Is
there a proper way to get rid of these temporary sessions?
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 10:45 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
also by doing what you have done users with cookies disabled wont be
able to use your site...
40 matches
Mail list logo
