...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Should-Duration-be-deprecated--tp27323675p27339042.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
While we're on the subject of 1's and 0's:
Did you know this? There are only 10 types of people in the world: Those
who understand binary, and those who don't.
Back in my day we didn't need Tapestry, or Wicket or WebObjects, or even
Servlets, or for that matter Java! We just coded in plain
My keyboard on has 2 keys: 0 and 1.
Thats all i need when i code :)
NM
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 10:32 AM, Chris Colman chr...@stepaheadsoftware.com
wrote:
While we're on the subject of 1's and 0's:
Did you know this? There are only 10 types of people in the world: Those
who understand
I was wondering why would wicket need Duration class as long as java
provides a similar TimeUnit. Maybe it would be a good idea to deprecate this
class encourage usage of TimeUnit?
Alex Objelean
java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit only covers units from nanos to seconds
(in java 1.5, that is)
So before wicket moves to java 1.6 we probably have a 'no go' here...
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 3:42 PM, Objelean Alex alex.objel...@gmail.com wrote:
I was wondering why would wicket need Duration class as
Hej,
2010/1/26 Objelean Alex alex.objel...@gmail.com:
I was wondering why would wicket need Duration class as long as java
provides a similar TimeUnit. Maybe it would be a good idea to deprecate this
class encourage usage of TimeUnit?
If I am correct TimeUnit doesn't store a duration, it is
?
Alex Objelean
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Should-Duration-be-deprecated--tp27323675p27328738.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users
Duration class as long as java
provides a similar TimeUnit. Maybe it would be a good idea to deprecate
this
class encourage usage of TimeUnit?
Alex Objelean
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Should-Duration-be-deprecated--tp27323675p27328738.html
Sent from
Objelean
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Should-Duration-be-deprecated--tp27323675p27328738.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr
a similar TimeUnit. Maybe it would be a good idea to deprecate
this
class encourage usage of TimeUnit?
Alex Objelean
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Should-Duration-be-deprecated--tp27323675p27328738.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive
:
http://old.nabble.com/Should-Duration-be-deprecated--tp27323675p27328738.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional
Duration class as long as java
provides a similar TimeUnit. Maybe it would be a good idea to deprecate
this
class encourage usage of TimeUnit?
Alex Objelean
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Should-Duration-be-deprecated--tp27323675p27328738.html
Sent from
provides a similar TimeUnit. Maybe it would be a good idea to deprecate
this
class encourage usage of TimeUnit?
Alex Objelean
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Should-Duration-be-deprecated--tp27323675p27328738.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 10:00 PM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com wrote:
i thought they were all stored as electrons
My vote goes to Umpalumpa's shifting miniature pumpkins on scales
Martijn
--
Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
Apache Wicket 1.4
14 matches
Mail list logo
