RE: Single inheritence in parts

2010-07-08 Thread Chris Colman
[mailto:dhar...@yahoo.com] Sent: Monday, 5 July 2010 3:40 PM To: users@wicket.apache.org Subject: Single inheritence in parts Hi, all the examples etc suggest that Single inheritence is possible but I cant break it up. The break up is essential when you want to merge common parts of your MARKUP

RE: Single inheritence in parts

2010-07-08 Thread Chris Colman
-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Single-inheritence-in-parts- tp2278064p2278064.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e

Re: Single inheritence in parts

2010-07-08 Thread Ben Tilford
this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Single-inheritence-in-parts- tp2278064p2278064.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr

RE: Single inheritence in parts

2010-07-08 Thread Chris Colman
?! -Thanks Arjun -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Single-inheritence-in-parts- tp2278064p2278064.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe

Re: Single inheritence in parts

2010-07-08 Thread James Carman
-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Single-inheritence-in-parts- tp2278064p2278064.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional

Re: Single inheritence in parts

2010-07-08 Thread Igor Vaynberg
the first part renders. I'm wondering if we can add such capability. Conceptually I don't see why not. If already possible do let me know or consider as a feature request?! -Thanks Arjun -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Single-inheritence-in-parts

Re: Single inheritence in parts

2010-07-08 Thread Ben Tilford
this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Single-inheritence-in-parts- tp2278064p2278064.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr

Re: Single inheritence in parts

2010-07-08 Thread James Carman
or consider as a feature request?! -Thanks Arjun -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Single-inheritence-in-parts- tp2278064p2278064.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com

Re: Single inheritence in parts

2010-07-08 Thread James Carman
such capability. Conceptually I don't see why not. If already possible do let me know or consider as a feature request?! -Thanks Arjun -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Single-inheritence-in-parts- tp2278064p2278064.html Sent from the Wicket

Re: Single inheritence in parts

2010-07-07 Thread Erik van Oosten
I must have been listening to the wrong people then. Sorry to continue any false hopes. Too bad; there is only a small sweet spot for markup inheritance, but with this extension it would be very sweet indeed. Thanks for the link Jeremy. Regards, Erik. On 06-07-10 22:08, Jeremy

Re: Single inheritence in parts

2010-07-07 Thread Erik van Oosten
Indeed, multiple inheritance is not the correct term in this case. The point is that the parent class' markup may contain multiple places to place components from sub-classes. Regards, Erik. Op 06-07-10 18:03, Arjun Dhar wrote: On a last note; ..am confusedmultiple inheritance

Re: Single inheritence in parts

2010-07-06 Thread Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
renders. I'm wondering if we can add such capability. Conceptually I don't see why not. If already possible do let me know or consider as a feature request?! -Thanks Arjun -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Single-inheritence-in-parts-tp2278064p2278064

Re: Single inheritence in parts

2010-07-06 Thread Erik van Oosten
Yes, this has been promised many times. And I am looking forward to it :) Regards, Erik. Op 06-07-10 07:53, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro wrote: Hi Jeremy, Wasn't this on the which list for 1.5? [1] and [2]? Cheers, Ernesto

Re: Single inheritence in parts

2010-07-06 Thread Arjun Dhar
parents). Here there is only ONE PARENT MARKUP required and ONE CHILD markup. Maybe my perspective is not right. I'll search more material on this and educate myself. thanks a lot -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Single-inheritence-in-parts

Re: Single inheritence in parts

2010-07-06 Thread Jeremy Thomerson
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 4:38 AM, Erik van Oosten e.vanoos...@grons.nlwrote: Yes, this has been promised many times. And I am looking forward to it :) Regards, Erik. Op 06-07-10 07:53, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro wrote: Hi Jeremy, Wasn't this on the which list for 1.5? [1] and [2]?

Re: Single inheritence in parts

2010-07-05 Thread Jeremy Thomerson
.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Single-inheritence-in-parts-tp2278064p2278064.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail

Re: Single inheritence in parts

2010-07-05 Thread Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
Arjun -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Single-inheritence-in-parts-tp2278064p2278064.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users

Single inheritence in parts

2010-07-04 Thread Arjun Dhar
part renders. I'm wondering if we can add such capability. Conceptually I don't see why not. If already possible do let me know or consider as a feature request?! -Thanks Arjun -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Single-inheritence-in-parts