Martin,
Thank you, I got the basics working with Jetty Wicket Filters.
LocaleFirstMapper was a better starting point instead of
PageInstanceMapper.
Cheers,
Eric Gulatee
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 3:42 AM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.orgwrote:
Hi,
I think the cleanest approach is to
Hi,
I think the cleanest approach is to create your own IRequestMapper and set
it as root mapper.
See
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET/Request+mapping#Requestmapping-CryptoMapper
and
HttpsMapper to understand what root mapper is.
Also see
Hi fellow Wicketeers,
We are in the process of upgrading a 1.4.X application to 1.5.X
We had 2 different URL 'contexts' within the same Wicket 1.4 Application.
/protected/*
All pages annotated with security. [In order to use J2EE security, LTPA,
Kerberos etc]
/*
All unprotected pages
context root and seemingly correctly
determine it should be used to match the urls.
ie: /contextroot/wicket/page?33
Is there any reason I can't replicate the pageinstancemapper by my own?
And if so, why do I get pageexpired problems?
Cheers,
Eric Gulatee
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Eric
Yeah if they somehow can be related to a person.. So if you are to use
such statistics you have to obfuscate data to make certain that it's
not possible who (a named person) did what. I guess it's not directly
target against the web, but a general law.. But enough of our weird
rules :)
[1]
Hi!
We would like to use google analytics to track how users use our site.
This means that the url should contain some information about on which
page the user is on and furthermore google should be taught to ignore
some of the redundant dynamic part like wicket:interface=:1
which does not
why not just omit the analytics js on the pages that you do not want track of?
2010/5/22 Martin Makundi martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com:
Hi!
We would like to use google analytics to track how users use our site.
This means that the url should contain some information about on which
page
Hmm... my problem was how to track not how to omit tracking ... ;]
**
Martin
2010/5/22 nino martinez wael nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com:
why not just omit the analytics js on the pages that you do not want track of?
2010/5/22 Martin Makundi martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com:
Hi!
We would
So on your pages that do not contain stateless content just omit the
ga js..? Should be simple and work, although depending on your
architecture..
2010/5/22 Martin Makundi martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com:
Hmm... my problem was how to track not how to omit tracking ... ;]
**
Martin
No. I do not want to omit. I want to track stateful content.
**
Martin
2010/5/22 nino martinez wael nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com:
So on your pages that do not contain stateless content just omit the
ga js..? Should be simple and work, although depending on your
architecture..
2010/5/22
I've been in the same situation, and decided against GA and in favour
of my own implementation. Main reason is that GA is problematic in the
EU due to privacy concerns. Nevertheless, whether you implement your
own tracker or use GA, you need to come up with semantics of
stateful content.
What our team did was write a behavior for tracking wicket component
rendering ajax behaviour execution which could be used to track wizard
actions...
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 10:33 AM, M. Hammer nab...@hammer-tour.com wrote:
I've been in the same situation, and decided against GA and in favour
Ahh I understand.. Never crossed my mind, as I think we laws against
that in denmark (where I am living)..
2010/5/22 Martin Makundi martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com:
No. I do not want to omit. I want to track stateful content.
**
Martin
2010/5/22 nino martinez wael
You have laws against collecting statistics about website usage?
**
Martin
2010/5/22 nino martinez wael nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com:
Ahh I understand.. Never crossed my mind, as I think we laws against
that in denmark (where I am living)..
2010/5/22 Martin Makundi
We are using google analytics with wicket on our site (the
asynchronous model), and explicitly specify the page URL by passing a
parameter to _trackPageView. See http://www.rixty.com. That way we
can track a logical view of the site hierarchy, and don't have to
worry about the page
Hello S D,
This might interest you:
http://day-to-day-stuff.blogspot.com/2008/10/wicket-extreme-consistent-urls.html
Note there are still some limitations. Your milage may vary.
Regards,
Erik.
S D wrote:
Hi,
I was browsing through examples, it looks very impressive but there's a thing
while this might work for your usecase this will pretty much break
things. the version number is in the url for a reason.
1) it completely kills the backbutton for that page. since the url
remains the same the browser wont record your actions in the history.
based on what you are trying to do
Thanks for clarifying limitation no 2, I had not though of this. Indeed
in my usecase this is not a problem.
'Limitation' no 1 is quite intentional.
If you don't mind, I've also added this comment to the article.
Regards,
Erik.
Igor Vaynberg wrote:
while this might work for your usecase
of course i dont mind.
-igor
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 12:39 AM, Erik van Oosten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for clarifying limitation no 2, I had not though of this. Indeed in
my usecase this is not a problem.
'Limitation' no 1 is quite intentional.
If you don't mind, I've also added
Hi,
I was browsing through examples, it looks very impressive but there's a thing
that bothers me somewhat. The Basic Label example uses the following URL:
One option is to define urls in your application:
mountBookmarkablePage(/Tour, TourBrowsePage.class);
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 4:03 PM, S D [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I was browsing through examples, it looks very impressive but there's a thing
that bothers me somewhat. The Basic Label
But what if the URL is dynamic like, for example, is this google URL that
points to the second page of results:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=enq=wicketstart=10sa=N
Thanks
--- On Tue, 10/28/08, Scott Swank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One option is to define urls in your application:
Those will be available to you in the YourPage(PageParameters
parameters) constructor.
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 5:08 PM, S D [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But what if the URL is dynamic like, for example, is this google URL that
points to the second page of results:
--- On Wed, 10/29/08, Scott Swank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Those will be available to you in the
YourPage(PageParameters
parameters) constructor.
So, if I understand you correctly, I'd have to call mountBookmarkablePage() for
all wicket URLs used in the application. Sounds somewhat tedious
You can also mount all pages in a package with one single call. You will
find this in old emails on the list, blogs, etc..
Google search for wicket mount package:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=enrls=com.microsoft%3A*q=wicket+bookmarkable+urls
The third result:
http://www.javalobby.org/java
all of these are for entry urls. urls that link to page instances or
after a form submit will still be
?wicket:interface=:4:foo.bar:ILinkListener
if you are that concerned with urls wicket might not be for you. you
give up control over urls for the convinience of not having to deal
with them
Yet another option is to alter the way the URL is coded, though an
IRequestCodingStrategy implementation.
Here are some real examples of how coded urls look:
--- On Wed, 10/29/08, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
all of these are for entry urls. urls that link to page
instances or after a form submit will still be
?wicket:interface=:4:foo.bar:ILinkListener
if you are that concerned with urls wicket might not be for
you. you give up
You have not given us one example of something that you need to do that
cannot have nice URLs with Wicket. You can mount an entire package of
classes to a single path and they will all have nice bookmarkable URLs.
There are a variety of different coding strategies that will give you URLs
--- On Wed, 10/29/08, Jeremy Thomerson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You have not given us one example of something that you need
to do that
cannot have nice URLs with Wicket. You can mount an entire
package of
classes to a single path and they will all have nice
bookmarkable URLs.
Here's
=ATVPDKIKX0DERpf_rd_r=0JKDZNDV01P8F1Q5H366
-igor
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 8:46 PM, S D [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- On Wed, 10/29/08, Jeremy Thomerson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You have not given us one example of something that you need
to do that
cannot have nice URLs with Wicket. You can mount
to Wicket (and liking it compared to what I've seen
before!) I cant see how I can add a parameter with a dynamic value into the
actual link html thats generated. Can anyone help?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Dynamic-user-supplied-parameters-on-wicket-Link-urls
(and liking it compared to what I've seen
before!) I cant see how I can add a parameter with a dynamic value into the
actual link html thats generated. Can anyone help?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Dynamic-user-supplied-parameters-on-wicket-Link-urls
:
http://www.nabble.com/Dynamic-user-supplied-parameters-on-wicket-Link-urls-tp17184358p17184358.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
34 matches
Mail list logo
