custom" builds for the community.
>>> Any thought on this idea ?
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 10:30 AM, Partridge, Lucas (GE Aviation) <
>>> lucas.partri...@ge.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I like the 'zeppelin-bin-netinst’ idea
regarding 0.6.0 release package
sure…that is possible. one can also make a build from source and customize as
needed. but not having to do that makes things easier. i do believe that for
the vast majority of cases a minimal build with spark (and possibly other small
items like shell, jdbc, python
sure…that is possible. one can also make a build from source and customize as
needed. but not having to do that makes things easier. i do believe that for
the vast majority of cases a minimal build with spark (and possibly other small
items like shell, jdbc, python) will be quite valuable,
I think making the 'zeppelin-bin-netinst' is greate idea and more make
sense than voting which interpreter should be included to zeppelin-bin-min.
2016-06-18 1:15 GMT+09:00 moon soo Lee :
> In case of no internet access, how about
>
> a. download 'zeppelin-bin-netinst' and run
This plan sounds great of having a script that can install individual
available interpreters. It sounds reasonable to always ship with a spark
version for now for lack of complexity in installing that.
The original list of min interpreters seems good, too. The generic jdbc
interpreter handles a
Many production environments have no internet access. A script like this can
be useful to some but it should not replace the proposed min binary.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 17, 2016, at 9:20 PM, moon soo Lee wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for bringing this discussion.
> it's
Hi,
Thanks for bringing this discussion.
it's great idea minimize binary package size.
Can we set a policy to decide which interpreter goes to 'zeppelin-bin-min',
which is not?
One alternative is, instead of making 'zeppelin-bin-min', we can make
'zeppelin-bin-netinst'.
We can provide a shell
t;
>
>
> *From:* mina lee [mailto:mina...@apache.org]
> *Sent:* Friday, June 17, 2016 1:32 PM
> *To:* users@zeppelin.apache.org
> *Subject:* Ask opinion regarding 0.6.0 release package
>
>
>
> Hi all!
>
>
>
> Zeppelin just started release process. Prior to creat
edin.com/company/resilinc-corporation>
[cid:image005.png@01D0E4E0.2F0DB8A0]
<https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCbo4dHglF3tdc-h7Db8YaGw>
From: mina lee [mailto:mina...@apache.org]
Sent: Friday, June 17, 2016 1:32 PM
To: users@zeppelin.apache.org
Subject: Ask opinion regarding 0.6.0 release packa
Hi,
Our company’s use is spark, phoenix, jdbc/psql. So, if you make different
packages, I would need the full one. In addition, for the minimized one, would
there be a way to pick and choose interpreters to add/plug in?
Thanks,
Ben
> On Jun 17, 2016, at 1:02 AM, mina lee
Hello,
Concerning jdbc, you can load drivers dynamically, and JdbcInterpreter
covers all of function of PostgresqlInterpreter.
Hope this help,
JL
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 5:45 PM, kevin giroux
wrote:
> Postgres sql could be usefull. Many society use it.
>
> Le ven.
Postgres sql could be usefull. Many society use it.
Le ven. 17 juin 2016 à 10:26, Mohit Jaggi a écrit :
> Perfect...with jdbc do you need to package several drivers?
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Jun 17, 2016, at 1:32 PM, mina lee wrote:
>
> Hi all!
>
Perfect...with jdbc do you need to package several drivers?
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 17, 2016, at 1:32 PM, mina lee wrote:
>
> Hi all!
>
> Zeppelin just started release process. Prior to creating release candidate I
> want to ask users' opinion about how you want it
13 matches
Mail list logo