Re: [ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: single node fails to start the ocfs2 resource

On 03/14/2018 08:35 AM, Muhammad Sharfuddin wrote: > Hi Andrei, > >Somehow I miss corosync confiuration in this thread. Do you know > >wait-for-all is set (how?) or you just assume it? > > > solution found, I was not using "wait_for_all"  option, I was assuming > that "two_node: 1" > would be

Re: [ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: single node fails to start the ocfs2 resource

On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 10:35 AM, Muhammad Sharfuddin wrote: > Hi Andrei, >>Somehow I miss corosync confiuration in this thread. Do you know >>wait-for-all is set (how?) or you just assume it? >> > solution found, I was not using "wait_for_all" option, I was assuming

Re: [ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: single node fails to start the ocfs2 resource

Hi Andrei, >Somehow I miss corosync confiuration in this thread. Do you know >wait-for-all is set (how?) or you just assume it? > solution found, I was not using "wait_for_all"  option, I was assuming that "two_node: 1" would be sufficient: nodelist {     node { ring0_addr: 10.8.9.151 

Re: [ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: single node fails to start the ocfs2 resource

On 03/13/2018 03:43 PM, Muhammad Sharfuddin wrote: > Thanks a lot for the explanation. But other then the ocfs2 resource > group, this cluster starts all other resources > > on a single node, without any issue just because the use of > "no-quorum-policy=ignore" option. Yes I know. And what I

Re: [ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: single node fails to start the ocfs2 resource

Thanks a lot for the explanation. But other then the ocfs2 resource group, this cluster starts all other resources on a single node, without any issue just because the use of "no-quorum-policy=ignore" option. -- Regards, Muhammad Sharfuddin On 3/13/2018 7:32 PM, Klaus Wenninger wrote: On

Re: [ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: single node fails to start the ocfs2 resource

On 03/13/2018 02:30 PM, Muhammad Sharfuddin wrote: > Yes, by saying pacemaker,  I meant to say corosync as well. > > Is there any fix ? or a two node cluster can't run ocfs2 resources > when one node is offline ? Actually there can't be a "fix" as 2 nodes are just not enough for a partial-cluster

Re: [ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: single node fails to start the ocfs2 resource

On 03/13/2018 02:03 PM, Muhammad Sharfuddin wrote: > Hi, > > 1 - if I put a node(node2) offline; ocfs2 resources keep running on > online node(node1) > > 2 - while node2 was offline, via cluster I stop/start the ocfs2 > resource group successfully so many times in a row. > > 3 - while node2 was

Re: [ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: single node fails to start the ocfs2 resource

Hi, 1 - if I put a node(node2) offline; ocfs2 resources keep running on online node(node1) 2 - while node2 was offline, via cluster I stop/start the ocfs2 resource group successfully so many times in a row. 3 - while node2 was offline; I restart the pacemaker service on the node1 and then