Re: [v8-users] Building v8 in an lxc container

Added the "o" flag to the extract line here: https://github.com/v8/v8/blob/5749d710bc73ef40f9b9e8b94ec290e0412d3f57/third_party/binutils/download.py#L91 and that worked, but then ran into another snag, similar to this one: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=209871 Bailed on the build

[v8-users] Building v8 in an lxc container

I'm trying to build v8 in an lxc container and am getting the following errors when I try to run gclient sync, I believe because the ownership uid:gid of the files that are being extracted is out outside of the range of uid:gid available to the container. How can I add the --no-same-owner flag

[v8-users] Re: [blink-dev] Re: Passive Error Event

Still not entirely sure what particular scenario you have in mind. I don't think there is a performance penalty on caught exceptions if you have a listener for uncaught ones. Yang On Fri, May 27, 2016, 17:31 PhistucK wrote: > Of course listening to the event is implemented

[v8-users] Re: [blink-dev] Re: Passive Error Event

Of course listening to the event is implemented in Blink, but it uses V8 APIs in order to break at uncaught exceptions, so I wondered if activating this makes the execution less performant. ☆*PhistucK* On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 6:19 PM, Yang Guo wrote: > That doesnt sound

[v8-users] Re: [blink-dev] Re: Passive Error Event

That doesnt sound like something in V8. The onerror listener is implemented by blink. Yang On Tue, May 24, 2016, 12:55 PhistucK wrote: > Not throwing errors, but whether adding an event listener to the "error" > influences performance without even throwing errors. I just do

Re: [v8-users] Invalid Memory Allocation

Thank you Pada tanggal 26 Mei 2016 22:25, "Cesar Valdez" menulis: > Hi All, > > I working in a add-on for Node.js, and i have the following problem: > > class A { > > local CreateObject( callback) { > > if(!p->isEmpty()){ > auto tmp = Object::New(Isolate,