Maaf saya tidak kesengajaan saya. T.ksh
Pada tanggal 27 Jun 2016 18.05, "Yang Guo" menulis:
> Is there any way for an user run code on the node.js instance at all? I'm
> asking since node.js runs on the server, so the source is usually not
> accessible from outside.
>
>
>
It doesn't seem that hard to hack node to do this.
You use something like nasm and include your packaged .js program. Then
hack node to load and optionally decrypt your program and eval() it. Nasm
generates a .o file you link your custom node with.
Seems like a couple of hours' work.
You would
This is actually a fairly common requirement that I've had the "pleasure"
of dealing with for a host of people and firms. Unfortunately, it's also
very easy to mess up without a lot of care. I have a longtime interest in
reverse engineering so I may have a different standard of "trivial
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 3:20 PM, Danny Dorfman wrote:
> Hello Ben,
> Actually, I was expecting the current value to be there. As Jochen mentioned
> below, it's only valid if it's been previously set within the interceptor.
> Is there a way to know the real current value
Hello Ben,
Actually, I was expecting the current value to be there. As Jochen
mentioned below, it's only valid if it's been previously set within the
interceptor.
Is there a way to know the *real* current value before it's overwritten?
D.
On Monday, June 27, 2016 at 12:24:57 PM UTC+3, Ben
You can run V8 with --expose-gc. You can then call gc() to manually trigger
gc. Don't assume this to be officially supported though.
On Monday, June 13, 2016 at 6:16:23 PM UTC+2, WENZHI CUI wrote:
>
> Hi Yang,
> Thanks very much for the reply.
> I have one follow-up question:
> Is there
Is there any way for an user run code on the node.js instance at all? I'm
asking since node.js runs on the server, so the source is usually not
accessible from outside.
On Tuesday, June 14, 2016 at 3:33:35 PM UTC+2, Joe Bloggs wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> My employer is looking to shift major
ReturnValue::Get only tells you what the return value you previously have
set is.
Ideally, you use a non-masking interceptor. In that case, you know that the
current value is not defined.
best
-jochen
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 11:24 AM Ben Noordhuis wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 26,
On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 3:04 PM, Danny Dorfman wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I am writing some interceptor code for my objects, and I was wondering,
> whether it was possible to know,
> what is the current value for the property, before it's overwritten by
>